Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 60:161 | Cite as

Liquid jet penetration and breakup in a free supersonic gas jet

  • H. Jones
  • S. MenonEmail author
Research Article
  • 170 Downloads

Abstract

The interaction of a coherent liquid jet with a free supersonic gas jet is of importance in cooling high-temperature exhaust plumes generated by ground rocket tests. Further, the associated phenomena are distinct from the well-studied jet in supersonic crossflow due to the unbounded nature of the gas jet, its shock train structure, and the relative sizes of the two jets. This work utilizes non-intrusive diagnostics including focused color Schlieren, high-speed diffused backlit imaging, and volume-illuminated imaging to study the interaction process of a high Reynolds number water jet with a free supersonic air jet. The effect of the water jet on the shock train structure and its dependence on water injection location and pressure are studied. The ensuing water jet breakup mode is investigated and found to exhibit distinguishing characteristics from known breakup modes observed at high Reynolds and gas Weber numbers. Finally, the water jet penetration height is quantified, and the ability of existing correlations from the literature to predict the penetration height are investigated.

Graphic abstract

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by NASA EPSCoR and the Board of Regents of the state of Louisiana through the Research Award Program as well as the Graduate Student Research Assistance Award. We would like to thank Dr. Daniel Allgood from NASA Stennis Space Center for his support and collaboration as well conducting the numerical simulations whose results have been included in this work. We would also like to thank Dr. Ingmar Schoegl from LSU for use of the focusing color Schlieren apparatus developed by him and his research group.

Funding

This article was funded by Louisiana Board of Regents (Grant no. AWD-000463).

References

  1. Allgood D (2018) Private communicationGoogle Scholar
  2. Allgood D, Saunders G, Langford L (2012) Reduction of altitude diffuser jet noise using water injection. In: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 9–12th January 2012, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  3. Broumand M, Birouk M (2016) Liquid jet in a subsonic gaseous crossflow: recent progress and remaining challenges. Prog Energy Combust Sci 57:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Henderson B (2010) Fifty years of fluidic injection for jet noise reduction. Int J Aeroacoust 9(1–2):91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Herrmann M (2010) Detailed numerical simulations of the primary atomization of a turbulent liquid jet in crossflow. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 132(6):061506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang W (2016) Transverse jet in supersonic crossflows. Aerosp Sci Technol 50:183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Karagozian AR (2014) The jet in crossflow. Phys Fluids 26(10):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krothapalli A, Venkatakrishnan L, Lourenco L, Greska B, Elavarasan R (2003) Turbulence and noise suppression of a high-speed jet by water injection. J Fluid Mech 491:131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Madabhushi RK, Leong MY, Arienti M, Brown CT, McDonell VG (2006) On the breakup regime map of liquid jet in crossflow. In: 19th Annual conference on liquid atomization and spray systems, Toronto, Canada, May, pp 23–26Google Scholar
  10. No SY (2015) A review on empirical correlations for jet/spray trajectory of liquid jet in uniform cross flow. Int J Spray Combust Dyn 7(4):283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ostlund J, Muhammad-Klingmann B (2005) Supersonic flow separation with application to rocket engine nozzles. Appl Mech Rev 58(3):143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Perurena JB, Asma C, Theunissen R, Chazot O (2009) Experimental investigation of liquid jet injection into Mach 6 hypersonic crossflow. Exp Fluids 46(3):403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sallam KA, Aalburg C, Faeth G, Lin KC, Carter C, Jackson TA (2006) Primary breakup of round aerated-liquid jets in supersonic crossflows. Atom Sprays 16(6):657–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schoegl I, Pisano AJ, Sedky G (2016) Development of a compact focusing color schlieren technique. In: 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 4–8 January 2016, San Diego, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  15. Shelar VM, Rao S, Hegde G, Umesh G, Jagadeesh G, Reddy K (2014) Acetone planar laser-induced fluorescence for supersonic flow visualization in air and nitrogen jet. Int J Mech Mater Eng 9(1):28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stenzler JN, Lee JG, Santavicca DA, Lee W (2006) Penetration of liquid jets in a cross-flow. Atom Sprays 16(8):887–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wu PK, Kirkendall KA, Fuller RP, Gruber MR, Nejad AS (1997) Spray trajectories of liquid fuel jets in subsonic crossflows. Int J Fluid Mech Res 24(1–3):128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yates C (1971) Liquid injection into supersonic airstreams. In: 7th Propulsion Joint Specialist Conference, 14 June 1971–18 June 1971, Salt Lake City, UTGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations