Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 60:156 | Cite as

Study on bubble visualization of gas-evolving electrolysis in forced convective electrolyte

  • Jae Won Lee
  • Dong Kee Sohn
  • Han Seo KoEmail author
Research Article
  • 170 Downloads

Abstract

Electrolysis has been applied to many industrial fields because of the simple configuration and various usages. The bubble on the surface of electrodes is one of the most important factors that reduce the transport of electrons in the channel. In this study, the nucleation process of bubbles on electrodes against the time and the characteristics of bubble motion right after departure from the electrode were analyzed according to the Reynolds number of convective electrolytes. To verify the influence of the flow convection, the bubble behavior such as size and motion was analyzed by image processing. For an efficient configuration, the length of the electrode could be designed using empirical equations about the thickness of the bubble layer.

Graphic abstract

Contour of bubble layer for Re = 900 with current density of (a) 400 A/m2, (b) 800 A/m2, and (c) 1200 A/m2 at steady state (W = 0.008 m and L = 0.18 m)

List of symbols

\(a\)

Change rate of bubble velocity (m/s2)

\(\Delta c_{\text{b}}\)

Concentration difference at bubble [\({\text{mol}}/{\text{m}}^{3}\)]

D

Diffusion coefficient (m/s2)

\(\tilde{D}\)

Diameter of bubble (m)

\(D_{\text{h}}\)

Hydraulic diameter (m)

H

Bubble height (m)

h

Distance between electrodes (m)

\(j\)

Current density (A/m2)

\(k_{\text{b}}\)

Mass transfer coefficient at gas–liquid interface (m/s)

\(k\)

Empirical constant for time-dependent bubble diameter

\(l\)

Dimensionless length of electrode

\(L\)

Length of electrode (m)

m

Mass of bubble (kg)

M

Molar mass of gas (kg/mol)

\(P\)

Pressure (Pa)

\(P_{\text{E}}\)

Electrical power (W)

\(P_{\text{H}}\)

Hydraulic power (W)

\(P_{\text{R}}\)

Ratio between electric and hydraulic power

\(Q\)

Flow rate of liquid (m3/s)

R

Ideal gas constant (J/K mol)

t

Time (s)

T

Thermodynamic temperature (K)

U

Mean velocity of liquid (m/s)

\(v\)

Velocity of bubble (m/s)

W

Width of electrode (m)

\(Y\)

Distance between electrodes (m)

Z

Velocity ratio

Ja

Jakob number, Eq. (1)

Re

Reynolds number of electrolyte

\(Re_{\text{v}}\)

Reynolds number of bubble, Eq. (4)

\(Sc\)

Schmidt number, Eq. (4)

\(Sh\)

Sherwood number, Eq. (4)

\(\gamma\)

Density ratio

\(\delta_{\text{b}}\)

Thickness of bubble layer

\(\mu\)

Kinematic viscosity

\(\rho\)

Density (kg/m3)

\(\theta\)

Contact angle between bubble and electrode

Subscripts

s

Kind of gas (\({\text{O}}_{2}\) or \({\text{H}}_{2}\))

L

Liquid

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation, Korea (2019R1A2C2003176).

References

  1. Abdelouahed L, Valentin G, Poncin S, Lapicque F (2014) Current density distribution and gas volume fraction in the gap of lantern blade electrodes. Chem Eng Res Des 92:559–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldas K, Pehlivanoglu N, Mat MD (2008) Numerical and experimental investigation of two-phase flow in an electrochemical cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:3668–3675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexiadis A, Dudukovic MP, Ramachandran P, Cornell A, Wanngård J, Bokkers A (2011) Liquid–gas flow patterns in a narrow electrochemical channel. Chem Eng Sci 66:2252–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boissonneau P, Byrne P (2000) An experimental investigation of bubble induced free convection in a small electrochemical cell. J Appl Electrochem 30:767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahlkild AA (2001) Modelling the two-phase flow and current distribution along a vertical gas-evolving electrode. J Fluid Mech 428:249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eigeldinger J, Vogt H (2000) The bubble coverage of gas evolving electrodes in a flowing electrolyte. Electrochim Acta 45:4449–4456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Askary WA, Sakr IM, Ibrahim KA, Balabel A (2015) Hydrodynamics characteristics of hydrogen evolution process through electrolysis: numerical and experimental studies. Energy 90:722–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabrielli C, Huet F, Keddam M, Macias A, Sahar A (1989) Potential drops due to an attached bubble on a gas—evolving electrode. J Appl Electrochem 19:617–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hreiz R, Abdelouahed L, Fünfschilling D, Lapicque F (2015a) Electrogenerated bubbles induced convection in narrow vertical cells: a review. Chem Eng Res Des 100:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hreiz R, Abdelouahed L, Fünfschilling D, Lapicque F (2015b) Electrogenerated bubbles induced convection in narrow vertical cells: pIV measurements and Euler-Lagrange CFD simulation. Chem Eng Sci 134:138–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klasinc R, Hočevar M, Baicar T, Širok B (2007) Visualization method for volume void fraction measurements in gas–liquid two-phase flows of a water turbine outlet channel. WIT Trans Eng SciGoogle Scholar
  12. Landolt D, Acost R, Muller RH, Tobias CW (1970) An optical study of cathodic hydrogen evolution in high rate electrolysis. J Electrochem Soc 117:839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee JW, Shin DH, Ko HS (2017) Analysis of electrolysis using PIV for water purification. The 12nd International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry, Busan, Korea, 19–21 June 2017Google Scholar
  14. Mandin P, Aissa AA, Roustan H, Hamburger J, Picard G (2008) Two-phase electrolysis process: from the bubble to the electrochemical cell properties. Chem Eng Process 47:1926–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Philippe M, Jérôme H, Sebastien B, Gérard P (2005) Modelling and calculation of the current density distribution evolution at vertical gas-evolving electrodes. Electrochim Acta 51:1140–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sakr IM, El-Askary WA, Balabel A, Ibrahim K (2013) Numerical study on natural and forced convection in electrochemical cell. CFD letters 5:81–96Google Scholar
  17. Shukla P, Singh KK, Tewari PK, Gupta PK (2012) Numerical simulation of flow electrolysers: effect of obstacles. Electrochim Acta 79:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vogt H (1981) A hydrodynamic model for the ohmic interelectrode resistance. Electrochim Acta 26:1311–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vogt H (1984) The rate of gas evolution of electrodes—I. An estimate of the efficiency of gas evolution from the supersaturation of electrolyte adjacent to a gas-evolving electrode. Electrochim Acta 29:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wedin R, Dahlkild AA (2001) On the transport of small bubbles under developing channel flow in a buoyant gas-evolving electrochemical cell. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:5228–5233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yunus RF, Zheng YM, Nanayakkara KGN, Chen JP (2009) Electrochemical removal of rhodamine 6G by using RuO2 coated Ti DSA. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:7466–7473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang D, Zeng K (2012) Evaluating the behavior of electrolytic gas bubbles and their effect on the cell voltage in alkaline water electrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:13825–13832CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations