Experiments in Fluids

, 60:153 | Cite as

Using deformable particles for single-particle measurements of velocity gradient tensors

  • Bardia Hejazi
  • Michael Krellenstein
  • Greg A. VothEmail author
Research Article


We measure the deformation of particles made of several slender arms in a two-dimensional (2D) linear shear and a three-dimensional (3D) turbulent flow. We show how these measurements of arm deformations along with the rotation rate of the particle allow us to extract the velocity gradient tensor of the flow. The particles used in the experiments have three symmetric arms in a plane (triads) and are fabricated using 3D printing of a flexible polymeric material. Deformation measurements of a particle free to rotate about a fixed axis in a 2D simple shear flow are used to validate our model relating particle deformations to the fluid strain. We then examine deformable particles in a 3D turbulent flow created by a jet array in a vertical water tunnel. Particle orientations and deformations are measured with high precision using four high-speed cameras and have an uncertainty on the order of \(10^{-4}\) radians. Measured deformations in 3D turbulence are small and only slightly larger than our orientation measurement uncertainty. Simulation results for triads in turbulence show deformations similar to the experimental observations. Deformable particles offer a promising method for measuring the full local velocity gradient tensor from measurements of a single particle where traditionally a high concentration of tracer particles would be required.

Graphic abstract



This work was supported by NSF Grant DMR-1508575, and Army Research Office Grants W911NF-15-1-0205 and W911NF-17-1-0176. We benefited from discussions with Stefan Kramel and Lee Walsh on software development and data analysis.


  1. Alben S, Shelley M, Zhang J (2002) Drag reduction through self-similar bending of a flexible body. Nature 420(6915):479–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali A, Plan ELCVM, Ray SS, Vincenzi D (2016) Semiflexible particles in isotropic turbulence. Phys Rev Fluids 1:082402Google Scholar
  3. Allende S, Henry C, Bec J (2018) Stretching and buckling of small elastic fibers in turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 121:154501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batchelor GK (1970) Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in stokes flow. J Fluid Mech 44(3):419–440MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker LE, Shelley MJ (2001) Instability of elastic filaments in shear flow yields first-normal-stress differences. Phys Rev Lett 87:198301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bretherton FP (1962) The motion of rigid particles in a shear flow at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 14(2):284–304MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brouzet C, Verhille G, Le Gal P (2014) Flexible fiber in a turbulent flow: a macroscopic polymer. Phys Rev Lett 112:074501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole BC, Marcus GG, Parsa S, Kramel S, Ni R, Voth GA (2016) Methods for measuring the orientation and rotation rate of 3D-printed particles in turbulence. JoVE 112:e53599Google Scholar
  9. Dotto D, Marchioli C (2019) Orientation, distribution, and deformation of inertial flexible fibers in turbulent channel flow. Acta Mech 230(2):597–621MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ezzeldin HM, de Tullio MD, Vanella M, Solares SD, Balaras E (2015) A strain-based model for mechanical hemolysis based on a coarse-grained red blood cell model. Ann Biomed Eng 43(6):1398–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gay A, Favier B, Verhille G (2018) Characterisation of flexible fibre deformations in turbulence. Europhys Lett 123(2):24001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray J, Hancock GJ (1955) The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa. J Exp Biol 32(4):802–814Google Scholar
  13. Guo HF, Lam NYK, Yang C, Li L (2017) Simulating three-dimensional dynamics of flexible fibers in a ring spinning triangle: chitosan and cotton fibers. Text Res J 87(11):1403–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris J, Pittman J (1975) Equivalent ellipsoidal axis ratios of slender rod-like particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 50(2):280–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kramel S (2018) Non-spherical particle dynamics in turbulence. PhD thesis, Wesleyan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Y, Perlman E, Wan M, Yang Y, Meneveau C, Burns R, Chen S, Szalay A, Eyink G (2008) A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence. J Turbul 9:N31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marchioli C, Vincent S (2019) Special issue on finite-size particles, drops and bubbles in fluid flows: advances in modelling and simulations. Acta Mech 230(2):381–386MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marcus GG, Parsa S, Kramel S, Ni R, Voth GA (2014) Measurements of the solid-body rotation of anisotropic particles in 3D turbulence. New J Phys 16(10):102001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ni R, Ouellette NT, Voth GA (2014) Alignment of vorticity and rods with lagrangian fluid stretching in turbulence. J Fluid Mech 743:R3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Powers TR (2010) Dynamics of filaments and membranes in a viscous fluid. Rev Mod Phys 82:1607–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Qi HJ, Joyce K, Boyce MC (2003) Durometer hardness and the stress-strain behavior of elastomeric materials. Rubber Chem Technol 76(2):419–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Qian B, Powers TR, Breuer KS (2008) Shape transition and propulsive force of an elastic rod rotating in a viscous fluid. Phys Rev Lett 100:078101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosti ME, Banaei AA, Brandt L, Mazzino A (2018) Flexible fiber reveals the two-point statistical properties of turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 121:044501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosti ME, De Vita F, Brandt L (2019) Numerical simulations of emulsions in shear flows. Acta Mech 230(2):667–682MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roy A, Hamati RJ, Lydia T, Koch DL, Voth GA (2019) Inertial torques and a symmetry breaking orientational transition in the sedimentation of slender fibers. J Fluid MechGoogle Scholar
  27. Segur JB, Oberstar HE (1951) Viscosity of glycerol and its aqueous solutions. Ind Eng Chem 43(9):2117–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stockie JM, Green SI (1998) Simulating the motion of flexible pulp fibres using the immersed boundary method. J Comput Phys 147(1):147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Volk A, Kähler CJ (2018) Density model for aqueous glycerol solutions. Exp Fluids 59(5):75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Voth GA, Soldati A (2017) Anisotropic particles in turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 49(1):249–276MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Young YN, Shelley MJ (2007) Stretch-coil transition and transport of fibers in cellular flows. Phys Rev Lett 99:058303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yu H, Kanov K, Perlman E, Graham J, Frederix E, Burns R, Szalay A, Eyink G, Meneveau C (2012) Studying lagrangian dynamics of turbulence using on-demand fluid particle tracking in a public turbulence database. J Turbul 13:N12MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsWesleyan UniversityMiddletownUSA

Personalised recommendations