Experiments in Fluids

, 60:118 | Cite as

On the physical mechanism of tip vortex cavitation hysteresis

  • Ali AminiEmail author
  • Martino Reclari
  • Takeshi Sano
  • Masamichi Iino
  • Matthieu Dreyer
  • Mohamed Farhat
Research Article


Inception and desinence thresholds of tip vortex cavitation (TVC), generated by an elliptical NACA 16-020 hydrofoil, are measured at different flow conditions for various gas contents. It is observed that TVC often disappears at cavitation indices significantly higher than the inception thresholds introducing large hystereses. Our measurements reveal that TVC desinence pressure increases with gas content and, under specific flow conditions, may reach to atmospheric pressure. When the pressure of the cavitating core is below the initial saturation pressure of the dissolved gases, water flowing adjacent to the interface becomes supersaturated, which leads to the diffusion of air molecules into TVC. To estimate the outgassing rate, a simple diffusion model is proposed and analytically solved. In addition, we demonstrate that the extent of the delay in desinence due to outgassing is also dictated by the bulk flow parameters, i.e., the incidence angle and freestream velocity. Owing to flow visualizations, we assert that formation of a laminar separation bubble of appropriate size and shape at the hydrofoil tip is a necessary condition for a delayed desinence. The separation bubble acts like a shelter and creates a relatively calm area at the vortex core by forcing the incoming flow to wrap around the axis. By roughening the hydrofoil tip, we demonstrate that the hysteresis is completely suppressed once the laminar separation bubble is destroyed. Moreover, our velocity measurements show that at near-wake, the incidence angle associated with delayed desinence is accompanied by a jet-like axial velocity profile while a wake-like profile is observed for the low-hysteresis case.

Graphic abstract



The present research received funding from the MSCA-ITN-ETN of the European Union’s H2020 program under REA Grant agreement No. 642536, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Japan).

Supplementary material

348_2019_2762_MOESM1_ESM.avi (157.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (AVI 161645 kb)
348_2019_2762_MOESM2_ESM.avi (142.1 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (AVI 145519 kb)


  1. Arndt REA (2002) Cavitation in vortical flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 34:143–175. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Arndt R, Keller A (1992) Water-quality effects on cavitation inception in a trailing vortex. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 114:430–438. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arndt REA, Maines BH (2000) Nucleation and bubble dynamics in vortical flows. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 122:488–493. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arndt R, Arakeri V, Higuchi H (1991) Some observations of tip-vortex cavitation. J Fluid Mech 229:269–289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arndt R, Pennings P, Bosschers J, van Terwisga T (2015) The singing vortex. Interf Focus 5:20150025. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bastos F, de Rachid F (2014) Modeling gaseous and vaporous cavitation in liquid flows within the context of the thermodynamics of irreversible processes. Int J Non-linear Mech 65:245–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billet ML, Weir DS (1975) The effect of gas diffusion on the flow coefficient for a ventilated cavity. J Fluids Eng 97:501–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birch D, Lee T, Mokhtarian F, Kafyeke F (2004) Structure and induced drag of a tip vortex. J Aircr 41:1138–1145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulon O, Callenaere M, Franc JP, Michel JM (1999) An experimental insight into the effect of confinement on tip vortex cavitation of an elliptical hydrofoil. J Fluid Mech 390:1–23. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennen CE (2014) Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang N, Ganesh H, Yakushiji R, Ceccio SL (2011) Tip vortex cavitation suppression by active mass injection. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 133:111301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Decaix J, Balarac G, Dreyer M et al (2015) RANS and LES computations of the tip-leakage vortex for different gap widths. J Turbul 16:309–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dreyer M (2015) Mind the gap: tip leakage vortex dynamics and cavitation in axial turbines. PhD Thesis, PhD thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  14. Dreyer M, Decaix J, Muench-Alligne C, Farhat M (2014) Mind the gap: a new insight into the tip leakage vortex using stereo-PIV. Exp Fluids 55:1849. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Escaler X, Egusquiza E, Farhat M et al (2006) Detection of cavitation in hydraulic turbines. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:983–1007. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franc J, Michel J (1985) Attached cavitation and the boundary-layer—experimental investigation and numerical treatment. J Fluid Mech 154:63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fruman D, Cerrutti P, Pichon T, Dupont P (1995) Effect of hydrofoil planform on tip vortex roll-up and cavitation. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 117:162–169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaster M (1969) The structure and behaviour of laminar separation bubbles. HM Stationery Office, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  19. Gopalan S, Katz J (2000) Flow structure and modeling issues in the closure region of attached cavitation. Phys Fluids 12:895–911. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Green S (1991) Correlating single-phase flow measurements with observations of trailing vortex cavitation. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 113:125–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green S, Acosta A (1991) Unsteady-flow in trailing vortices. J Fluid Mech 227:107–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gross TF, Pelz PF (2017) Diffusion-driven nucleation from surface nuclei in hydrodynamic cavitation. J Fluid Mech 830:138–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gross TF, Bauer J, Ludwig G et al (2018) Bubble nucleation from micro-crevices in a shear flow. Exp Fluids 59:12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holl JW, Arndt REA, Billet ML (1972) Limited cavitation and the related scale effects problem. In: Proceedings of 2nd international symposium on fluid mechanics and fluidics, JSME, Tokyo, pp 303–314Google Scholar
  25. Horton HP (1968) Laminar separation bubbles in two and three dimensional incompressible flow (Doctoral dissertation). Queen Mary College, University of London, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Ito Y, Oba R (1985) A limited role of separation bubble in desinent cavitation. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 107:121–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keller AP (2001) Cavitation Scale Effects-empirically found relations and the correlation of cavitation number and hydrodynamic coefficients. Httpresolver Caltech Educ Lect 001Google Scholar
  28. Lee T, Pereira J (2010) Nature of wakelike and jetlike axial tip vortex flows. J Aircr 47:1946–1954. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee I, Maekiharju SA, Ganesh H, Ceccio SL (2016) Scaling of gas diffusion into limited partial cavities. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 138:051301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee C-S, Ahn B-K, Han J-M, Kim J-H (2018) Propeller tip vortex cavitation control and induced noise suppression by water injection. J Mar Sci Technol 23:453–463. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leroux JB, Astolfi JA, Billard JY (2001) An experimental investigation of partial cavitation on a two dimensional hydrofoil. In: CAV2001 fourth international symposium on Cavitation, pp 20–23Google Scholar
  32. Li X, Song Y, Hao Z, Gu C (2012) Cavitation mechanism of oil-film bearing and development of a new gaseous cavitation model based on air solubility. J Tribol 134:031701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ling-xin Z, Na Z, Xiao-xing P et al (2015) A review of studies of mechanism and prediction of tip vortex cavitation inception. J Hydrodyn 27:488–495. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luo X, Ji B, Tsujimoto Y (2016) A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery. J Hydrodyn 28:335–358. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maines BH, Arndt REA (1993) Viscous effects on tip vortex cavitation. ASME Publ FED 177:125Google Scholar
  36. Maines BH, Arndt REA (1997) Tip vortex formation and cavitation. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 119:413–419. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Makiharju SA, Ganesh H, Ceccio SL (2017) The dynamics of partial cavity formation, shedding and the influence of dissolved and injected non-condensable gas. J Fluid Mech 829:420–458. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCormick BW (1962) On cavitation produced by a vortex trailing from a lifting surface. J Basic Eng 84:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parkin B, Ravindra K (1991) Convective gaseous diffusion in steady axisymetric cavity flows. J Fluids Eng 113:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pauchet A, Briangon-Marjollet L (1970) Recent results on tip vortex cavitation scale effects at high reynolds numbers. In: WIT transactions on the built environment, vol 1. WIT Press.
  41. Pennings PC, Westerweel J, van Terwisga TJC (2015) Flow field measurement around vortex cavitation. Exp Fluids 56:206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roussopoulos K, Monkewitz PA (2000) Measurements of tip vortex characteristics and the effect of an anti-cavitation lip on a model Kaplan turbine blade. Flow Turbul Combust 64:119–144. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Shen YT, Gowing S, Jessup S (2009) Tip vortex cavitation inception scaling for high Reynolds number applications. J Fluids Eng-Trans ASME 131:071301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Song M, Xu L, Peng X, Tang D (2017) An acoustic approach to determine tip vortex cavitation inception for an elliptical hydrofoil considering nuclei-seeding. Int J Multiph Flow 90:79–87. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Souders WG, Platzer GP (1981) Tip vortex cavitation characteristics and delay of inception on a three-dimensional hydrofoil. Research and development rept. (No. DTNSRDC-81/007). David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Research and Innovation Center, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI)TakasagoJapan

Personalised recommendations