Abstract
The influence of transition control on shock-induced flow separation was investigated in a highly loaded transonic compressor cascade at an inlet Mach number of 1.21 and a chord-based Reynolds number of \(1.4 \times 10^6\). Transition was influenced by raising the free-stream turbulence from 0.5 to 2.5%. Two further cases employed either air-jet vortex generators (AJVG) or a surface roughness patch as transition control devices. Velocity fields in the vicinity of the unsteady transonic separation were captured by particle image velocimetry (PIV). Blade flexure induced by the unsteady aerodynamic loading was tracked for each image and compensated individually prior to PIV processing. The captured flow fields indicate shape variations of the separation region, while the shock foot moves within a range of up to 20% of chord. The frequency of separation for each investigated case was assessed on the number of vectors with negative velocity in each PIV sample. To further quantify the size of the separation region, the statistically independent PIV samples were conditionally averaged for various passage shock positions at a resolution of 1% chord length. Insight to the dynamics and frequency of the passage shock motion was further provided by high-speed shadowgraphy. Large bubble separation occurs if the turbulence of the incoming flow is low. The size of separation region decreases when AJVGs are applied but still exhibits bubble separation as the passage shock moves downstream. The size of the separation region is significantly reduced either if a roughness patch is applied or if the turbulence level of the incoming flow is high. The flow conditions showing bubble separation in the mean flow also exhibit distinct spectral peaks indicating periodic shock oscillations.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babinsky H, Harvey JK (eds) (2011) Shock wave-boundary-layer interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brion V, Dandois J, Mayer R, Reijasse P, Lutz T, Jacquin L (2019) Laminar buffet and flow control. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410018824516
Délery JM, Bur RS (2000) The physics of shock wave/boundary layer interaction control: last lessons learned. In: European Congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering, ECCOMAS, Barcelona
Délery JM, Marvin J (1986) Shock-wave boundary layer interactions. AGARDograph 280, AGARD
Dolling DS (2001) Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: what next? AIAA J 39(8):1517–1531. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1476
Dussauge JP, Piponniau S (2008) Shock/boundary-layer interactions: possible sources of unsteadiness. J Fluids Struct 24:1166–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.06.003
Fitzgerald EJ, Mueller TJ (1990) Measurements in a separation bubble on an airfoil using laser velocimetry. AIAA J 28(4):584–592. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10433
Flaszynski P, Doerffer P, Szwaba R, Kaczynski P, Piotrowicz M (2015) Shock wave boundary layer interaction on suction side of compressor profile in single passage test section. J Therm Sci 24(6):510–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-015-0816-9
Giannelis NF, Vio GA, Levinski O (2017) A review of recent developments in the understanding of transonic shock buffet. Prog Aerosp Sci 92:39–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.05.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376042117300271
Giepman RHM, Schrijer FFJ, van Oudheusden BW (2015) High-resolution piv measurements of a transitional shock wave-boundary layer interaction. Exp Fluids 56(6):113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1977-8
Hartmann A, Feldhusen A, Schröder W (2013) On the interaction of shock waves and sound waves in transonic buffet flow. Phys Fluids 25(2):026,101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4791603
Hartmann A, Klaas M, Schröder W (2012) Time-resolved stereo PIV measurements of shock-boundary layer interaction on a supercritical airfoil. Exp Fluids 52(3):591–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1074-6
Hergt A, Grund S, Steinert W (2016) Webpage of the transonic cascade wind tunnel. https://www.dlr.de/at/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-1549
Hergt A, Klinner J, Grund S, Willert C, Steinert W, Beversdorff M (2019) On the importance of transition control at transonic compressor blades. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Phoenix, Arizona, GT2019-90440
Hergt A, Klinner J, Wellner J, Willert C, Grund S, Steinert W, Beversdorff M (2018) The present challenge of transonic compressor blade design. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Oslo, Norway, GT2018-75528
Jacquin L, Molton P, Deck S, Maury B, Soulevant D (2009) Experimental study of shock oscillation over a transonic supercritical profile. AIAA J 47(9):1985–1994. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30190
Klinner J, Hergt A, Willert C (2014) Experimental investigation of the transonic flow around the leading edge of an eroded fan airfoil. Exp Fluids 55(9):1800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1800-y
Lee B (2001) Self-sustained shock oscillations on airfoils at transonic speeds. Prog Aerosp Sci 37(2):147–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00003-3
Meyer R, Knobloch K, Linden J (2010) Hot-wire measurement in a high speed counter rotating turbo fan rig. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Glasgow, UK, GT2010-22569
Raffel M, Willert C, Scarano F, Kähler C, Wereley S, Kompenhans J (2017) Particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68852-7
Ragni D, Schrijer F, van Oudheusden B, Scarano F (2011) Particle tracer response across shocks measured by PIV. Exp Fluids 50(1):53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0892-2
Sartor F, Losfeld G, Bur R (2012) PIV study on a shock-induced separation in a transonic flow. Exp Fluids 53(3):815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1330-4
Scarano F (2002) Iterative image deformation methods in PIV. Meas Sci Technol 13(1):R1. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/13/1/201. http://stacks.iop.org/0957-0233/13/i=1/a=201
Szwaba R (2011) Comparison of the influence of different air-jet vortex generators on the separation region. Aerosp Sci Technol 15(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2010.06.001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963810000714
Szwaba R (2013) Influence of air-jet vortex generator diameter on separation region. J Therm Sci 22(4):294–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-013-0627-9
Szwaba R, Kaczynski P, Doerffer P (2019) Roughness effect on shock wave boundary layer interaction area in compressor fan blades passage. Aerosp Sci Technol 85:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.006. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963818310794
Tejero F, Doerffer P, Szulc O (2015) Shock wave induced flow separation control by air-jet and rod vortex generators. TASK Q Sci Bull Acad Comput Centre Gdansk 19(2):167–180. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-389a6977-77e0-4ca2-b6fb-39e13bd26223
Welch P (1967) The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust 15(2):70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901
Willert C, Mitchell D, Soria J (2012) An assessment of high-power light-emitting diodes for high frame rate schlieren imaging. Exp Fluids 53:413–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1297-1
Acknowledgements
Part of the work presented herein is supported by the EU research project TFAST (Transition Location Effect on Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction, project no. 265455) of the 7th Framework Programme whose support is gratefully acknowledged. We thank our reviewers for their constructive remarks and detailed discussion on the content of the earlier version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klinner, J., Hergt, A., Grund, S. et al. Experimental investigation of shock-induced separation and flow control in a transonic compressor cascade. Exp Fluids 60, 96 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2736-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2736-z