Experimental investigation of shock-induced separation and flow control in a transonic compressor cascade
The influence of transition control on shock-induced flow separation was investigated in a highly loaded transonic compressor cascade at an inlet Mach number of 1.21 and a chord-based Reynolds number of \(1.4 \times 10^6\). Transition was influenced by raising the free-stream turbulence from 0.5 to 2.5%. Two further cases employed either air-jet vortex generators (AJVG) or a surface roughness patch as transition control devices. Velocity fields in the vicinity of the unsteady transonic separation were captured by particle image velocimetry (PIV). Blade flexure induced by the unsteady aerodynamic loading was tracked for each image and compensated individually prior to PIV processing. The captured flow fields indicate shape variations of the separation region, while the shock foot moves within a range of up to 20% of chord. The frequency of separation for each investigated case was assessed on the number of vectors with negative velocity in each PIV sample. To further quantify the size of the separation region, the statistically independent PIV samples were conditionally averaged for various passage shock positions at a resolution of 1% chord length. Insight to the dynamics and frequency of the passage shock motion was further provided by high-speed shadowgraphy. Large bubble separation occurs if the turbulence of the incoming flow is low. The size of separation region decreases when AJVGs are applied but still exhibits bubble separation as the passage shock moves downstream. The size of the separation region is significantly reduced either if a roughness patch is applied or if the turbulence level of the incoming flow is high. The flow conditions showing bubble separation in the mean flow also exhibit distinct spectral peaks indicating periodic shock oscillations.
Part of the work presented herein is supported by the EU research project TFAST (Transition Location Effect on Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction, project no. 265455) of the 7th Framework Programme whose support is gratefully acknowledged. We thank our reviewers for their constructive remarks and detailed discussion on the content of the earlier version of the manuscript.
- Délery JM, Bur RS (2000) The physics of shock wave/boundary layer interaction control: last lessons learned. In: European Congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering, ECCOMAS, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
- Délery JM, Marvin J (1986) Shock-wave boundary layer interactions. AGARDograph 280, AGARDGoogle Scholar
- Dussauge JP, Piponniau S (2008) Shock/boundary-layer interactions: possible sources of unsteadiness. J Fluids Struct 24:1166–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giannelis NF, Vio GA, Levinski O (2017) A review of recent developments in the understanding of transonic shock buffet. Prog Aerosp Sci 92:39–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.05.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376042117300271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hergt A, Grund S, Steinert W (2016) Webpage of the transonic cascade wind tunnel. https://www.dlr.de/at/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-1549
- Hergt A, Klinner J, Grund S, Willert C, Steinert W, Beversdorff M (2019) On the importance of transition control at transonic compressor blades. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Phoenix, Arizona, GT2019-90440Google Scholar
- Hergt A, Klinner J, Wellner J, Willert C, Grund S, Steinert W, Beversdorff M (2018) The present challenge of transonic compressor blade design. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Oslo, Norway, GT2018-75528Google Scholar
- Meyer R, Knobloch K, Linden J (2010) Hot-wire measurement in a high speed counter rotating turbo fan rig. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo Glasgow, UK, GT2010-22569Google Scholar
- Szwaba R (2011) Comparison of the influence of different air-jet vortex generators on the separation region. Aerosp Sci Technol 15(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2010.06.001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963810000714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Szwaba R, Kaczynski P, Doerffer P (2019) Roughness effect on shock wave boundary layer interaction area in compressor fan blades passage. Aerosp Sci Technol 85:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.006. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963818310794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tejero F, Doerffer P, Szulc O (2015) Shock wave induced flow separation control by air-jet and rod vortex generators. TASK Q Sci Bull Acad Comput Centre Gdansk 19(2):167–180. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-389a6977-77e0-4ca2-b6fb-39e13bd26223