Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 60:41 | Cite as

Planar momentum balance in three-dimensional flows: applications to load estimation

  • Jeffrey McClureEmail author
  • Serhiy Yarusevych
Research Article

Abstract

Load estimation from the momentum balance for a planar control volume is investigated, a configuration which is ubiquitous in experimental fluid mechanics. The classical formulation relies on an assumption of two-dimensional flow which is violated for instantaneous turbulent or transitional flow fields, and to varying degrees in measured mean and second order statistics. A rigorous formulation required for the exact momentum balance over the planar control volume is derived here, involving additional terms related to the three-dimensional momentum fluxes and viscous forces. The formulation is verified using instantaneous and mean control volume load estimations based on synthetic measurements extracted from direct numerical simulations and experimental particle image velocimetry measurements of flow over a cylinder in a turbulent wake regime. The main result is the demonstration of the significance of area integrals involving out-of-plane velocity and velocity gradients, which are shown to be required for accurate estimation of instantaneous sectional loads and cause a sensitivity to experimental conditions for mean sectional load estimates. If volumetric measurements are unavailable to the experimentalist, the divergence-free condition on the velocity field for incompressible flow may be invoked to account for a subset of the three-dimensional terms. This enables higher accuracy, particularly for the mean drag estimates in the statistically three-dimensional flow encountered in experiment. The findings highlight common issues responsible for inconsistent estimates of instantaneous and mean sectional loads for three-dimensional flows using control volume methods, and offer practical recipes for detecting and minimizing errors due to flow three-dimensionality.

Graphical abstract

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) (Grant no. RGPIN-04222) to the funding of this research.

Supplementary material

348_2019_2683_MOESM1_ESM.wmv (1.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (WMV 1.945 MB)
348_2019_2683_MOESM2_ESM.wmv (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (WMV 1.057 MB)

References

  1. Antonia RA, Rajagopalan S (1990) Determination of drag of a circular cylinder. AIAA J 28:1833–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azijli I, Dwight R (2015) Solenoidal filtering of volumetric velocity measurements using Gaussian process regression. Exp Fluids 56:198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baur T, Köngeter J (1999) Piv with high temporal resolution for the determination of local pressure reductions from coherent turbulent phenomena. In: 3rd Int. Workshop on Particle Image Velocimetry, Santa Barbara, pp 101–106Google Scholar
  4. Betz A (1925) A method for the direct determination of wing-section drag., Technical Report 337, NACA Tech. MemGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohl D, Koochesfahani M (2009) MTV measurements of the vortical field in the wake of an airfoil oscillating at high reduced frequency. J Fluid Mech 620:63–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dabiri J (2005) On the estimation of swimming and flying forces from wake measurements. J Exp Biol 208:3519–3532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dabiri J, Bose S, Gemmell B, Colin S, Costello J (2014) An algorithm to estimate unsteady and quasi-steady pressure fields from velocity field measurements. J Exp Biol 217:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwin C (1953) Note on hydrodynamics. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 49:342–354MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. David L, Jardin T, Farcy A (2009) On the non-intrusive evaluation of fluid forces with the momentum equation approach. Meas Sci Technol 9:095401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Kat R, van Oudheusden B (2012) Instantaneous planar pressure determination from PIV in turbulent flow. Exp Fluids 52:1089–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeVoria A, Zakery R, Ringuette M (2013) On calculating forces from the flow field with application to experimental volume data. J Fluid Mech 749:297–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghaemi S, Ragni D, Scarano F (2012) PIV-based pressure fluctuations in the turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 53:1823–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gharali K, Johnson D (2014) PIV-based load investigation in dynamic stall for different reduced frequencies. Exp Fluids 55:1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graham W, Pitt Ford C, Babinsky H (2017) An impulse-based approach to estimating forces in unsteady flow. J Fluid Mech 815:60–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guissart A, Bernal L, Dimitriadis G, Terrapon V (2017) PIV-based estimation of unsteady loads on a flat plate at high angle of attack using momentum equation approaches. Exp Fluids 58:53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gurka R, Liberzon A, Hefetz D, Rubinstein D, Shavit U (1999) Computation of pressure distribution using PIV velocity data. In: 3rd Int. Workshop on Particle Image Velocimetry, Santa Barbara, pp 671–676Google Scholar
  17. Jones BM (1936) The measurement of profile drag by the pitot-traverse method. Technical Report 1688, Air Ministry—Aeronautical Research Committe Reports and MemorandaGoogle Scholar
  18. Kotsonis M, Ghaemi S, Veldhuis L, Scarano F (2011) Measurement of the body force field of plasma actuators. J Phys D Appl Phys 44:045204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kriegseis J, Rival D (2014) Vortex force decomposition in the tip region of impulsively-started flat plates. J Fluid Mech 756:758–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurtulus D, Scarano F, David L (2007) Unsteady aerodynamic forces estimation on a square cylinder by TR-PIV. Exp Fluids 42:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Limacher E, Morton C, Wood D (2018) Generalized derivation of the added-mass and circulatory forces for viscous flows. Phys Rev Fluids 3:014701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin J, Rockwell D (1996) Force identification by vorticity fields: techniques based on flow imaging. J Fluids Stuct 10:663–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McClure J, Yarusevych S (2016) Vortex shedding and structural loading characteristics of finned cylinders. J Fluids Stuct 10:100–101Google Scholar
  24. McClure J, Yarusevych S (2017a) Instantaneous PIV/PTV-based pressure gradient estimation: a framework for error analysis and correction. Exp Fluids 58:92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McClure J, Yarusevych S (2017b) Optimization of planar PIV-based pressure estimates in laminar and turbulent wakes. Exp Fluids 58:62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McPhaden C, Rival D (2018) Unsteady force estimation using a Lagrangian drift-volume approach. Exp Fluids 59:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Méheut M, Bailly D (2008) Drag-breakdown methods from wake measurements. AIAA J 46:847–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohebbian A, Rival D (2012) Assessment of the derivative-moment transformation method for unsteady-load estimation. Exp Fluids 53:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moin P, Mahesh K (1998) Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30:539–578MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neatby H, Yarusevych S (2012) Towards reliable experimental drag measurements of an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. In: 42nd AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit. ASME, New Orleans, LouisianaGoogle Scholar
  31. Noca F, Shiels D, Jeon D (1999) A comparison of methods for evaluating time-dependent fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives. J Fluids Struct 13:551–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Poelma C, Dickson W, Dickinson M (2006) Time-resolved reconstruction of the full velocity field around a dynamically-scaled flapping wing. Exp Fluids 41:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ragni D, Ashok A, van Oudheusden B, Scarano F (2009) Surface pressure and aerodynamic loads determination of a transonic airfoil based on particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 20:074005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ragni D, van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2012) 3D pressure imaging of an aircraft propeller blade-tip flow by phase-locked stereoscopic PIV. Exp Fluids 52:463–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rival DE, van Oudheusden B (2017) Load-estimation techniques for unsteady incompressible flows. Exp Fluids 58:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saffman P (1992) Vortex dynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Schiavazzi D, Nemes A, Schmitter S, Coletti F (2017) The effect of velocity filtering in pressure estimation. Exp Fluids 58:50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sciacchitano A, Neal D, Smith B, Warner S, Vlachos P, Wieneke B, Scarano F (2015) Collaborative framework for PIV uncertainty quantification: comparative assessment of methods. Meas Sci Technol 26:074004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sciacchitano A, Wieneke B (2016) PIV uncertainty propagation. Meas Sci Technol 27:084006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spedding G, Hedenström A (2009) PIV-based investigations of animal flight. Exp Fluids 46:749–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stansby P (1974) The effect of end plates on the base pressure coefficient of a circular cylinder. Aeronaut J 78:36–37Google Scholar
  42. Takahashi T (1997) On the decomposition of drag components from wake flow measurements. In: 35th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  43. Terra W, Sciacchitano A, Scarano F (2017) Aerodynamic drag of a transiting sphere by large-scale tomographic-PIV. Exp Fluids 58:83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tronchin T, David L, Farcy A (2015) Loads and pressure evaluation of the flow around a flapping wing from instantaneous 3D velocity measurements. Exp Fluids 56:1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Unal M, Lin J, Rockwell D (1997) Force prediction by PIV imaging: a momentum-based approach. J Fluids Struct 11:965–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Dam CP (1999) Recent experience with different methods of drag prediction. Prog Aerosp Sci 35:751–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van Oudheusden B (2013) PIV-based pressure measurement. Meas Sci Technol 24:032001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van Oudheusden B, Scarano F, Casimiri E (2006) Non-intrusive load characterization of an airfoil using PIV. Exp Fluids 40:988–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van Oudheusden B, Scarano F, Roosenboom E, Casimiri E, Souverein L (2007) Evaluation of integral forces and pressure fields from planar velocimetry data for incompressible and compressible flows. Exp Fluids 43:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Villegas A, Diez F (2014) Evaluation of unsteady pressure fields and forces in rotating airfoils from time-resolved PIV. Exp Fluids 55:1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Violato D, Moore P, Scarano F (2011) Lagrangian and Eulerian pressure field evaluation of rod-airfoil flow from time-resolved tomographic PIV. Exp Fluids 50:1057–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. West G, Fox T (1990) On the use of endplates with circular cylinders. Exp Fluids 9:237–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Williamson C (1996) Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 28:477–539MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu J, Ma H, Zhou J (2006) Vorticity and vortex dynamics. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu J, Pan Z, Lu X (2005) Unsteady fluid-dynamic force solely in terms of control-surface integral. Phys Fluids 17:098102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zaman K, Culley D (2008) Flow separation control over an airfoil: implication of wake velocity-deficit reduction. In: 4th Flow Control Conference’, Seattle, Washington, pp 1–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations