Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 60:13 | Cite as

Skin friction and coherent structures within a laminar separation bubble

  • M. MiozziEmail author
  • A. Capone
  • M. Costantini
  • L. Fratto
  • C. Klein
  • F. Di Felice
Research Article
  • 368 Downloads

Abstract

We study the Laminar Separation Bubble (LSB) which develops on the suction side of a NACA 0015 hydrofoil by means of a Temperature-Sensitive Paint (TSP), at a Reynolds number of \(1.8\times 10^5\) and angles of attack \(\mathrm{AoA} = [3^{\circ }\), \(5^{\circ }\), \(7^{\circ }\), \(10^{\circ }\)]. The thermal footprints \(T_\mathrm{w}(x,y,t)\) of the fluid unveil three different flow regimes whose complexity in time and space decreases when \(\mathrm{AoA}\) increases, up to \(10^{\circ }\) where the LSB-induced spatial gradients are linked to quasi-steady positions in time. At \(\mathrm{AoA} =7^{\circ }\) the LSB system undergoes a 3D destabilization, that induces C-shaped arcs at separation and weak bubble-flapping at reattachment. Structural changes occur at \(AoA=5^{\circ }\) and \(3^{\circ }\): bubble-flapping raises homogeneously at reattachment while intermittent, wedge-shaped events alter the LSB shape. The relative skin-friction vector fields \(\varvec {\tau }_\mathrm{w}(x,y,t)\), extracted from \(T_\mathrm{w}(x,y,t)\) by means of an optical-flow-based algorithm, provide the topology of the flow at the wall and feed a physics-based criterion for the identification of flow separation \({\mathfrak {S}}(y,t)\) and reattachment \({\mathfrak {R}}(y,t)\). This criterion fulfills, in average, a novel skin-friction ground-truth estimation grounded on the determination of the propagation velocity of temperature fluctuations. The obtained \({\mathfrak {S}}(y,t)\) is composed of several manifolds that extend spanwise from saddle points to converging nodes via the saddles unstable manifold, while, at least at higher AoA, manifolds that compose \({\mathfrak {R}}(y,t)\) move from diverging nodes to saddle points via the saddles stable manifolds. The triggering of a wedge-shaped event by a rising \(\varOmega\)-shaped vortex in the reverse LSB flow is captured and described in analogy to a simplified model.

Graphical Abstract

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Flagship Project RITMARE, The Italian Research for the Sea, coordinated by the Italian National Research Council and funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research. Carsten Fuchs (DLR) is acknowledged for TSP surface treatment. An anonymous reviewer is also acknowledged for her/his careful contribution to improving the quality of the article.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 16820 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 9567 KB)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 8626 KB)

Supplementary material 4 (MP4 7292 KB)

348_2018_2651_MOESM5_ESM.mp4 (25.5 mb)
Supplementary material 5 (MP4 26149 KB)

References

  1. Acharya D, Rani A, Agarwal S, Singh V (2016) Application of adaptive Savitsky-Golay filter for EEG signal processing. Perspect Sci 8:677–679.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.06.056. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213020916301951
  2. Arnal D, Casalis G, Houdeville R (2009) Practical transition prediction methods: subsonic and transonic flows. In: AGARD RTO-EN-AVT-151, 7.1–7.34Google Scholar
  3. Ashill PR, Betts CJ, M GI (1996) A wind tunnel study of transitional flows on a swept panel wing at high subsonic speeds. In: Proc. CEAS 2nd European forum on laminar flow technology, (AAAF, Paris), vol. Paper No. 10(1):10.3–10.17Google Scholar
  4. Boiko AV, Dovgal AV, Grek GR, Kozlov VV (2012) Physics of transitional shear flows: instability and laminar-turbulent transition in incompressible near-wall shear layers. In: Fluid Mechanics and its Applications, 98, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  5. Borodulin VI, Gaponenko VR, Kachanov YS, Meyer DGW, Rist U, Lian QX, Lee CB (2002) Late-stage transitional boundary-layer structures. direct numerical simulation and experiment. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 15(5):317–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boutilier MSH, Yarusevych S (2012) Parametric study of separation and transition characteristics over an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Exp Fluids 52(6):1491–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgmann S, Dannemann J, Schröder W (2008) Time-resolved and volumetric PIV measurements of a transitional separation bubble on an SD7003 airfoil. Exp Fluids 44(4):609–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgmann S, Schröder W (2008) Investigation of the vortex induced unsteadiness of a separation bubble via time-resolved and scanning PIV measurements. Exp Fluids 45(4):675–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capone A, Klein C, Di Felice F, Beifuss U, Miozzi M (2015) Fast-response underwater TSP investigation of subcritical instabilities of a cylinder in crossflow. Exp Fluids 56(10):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CEIMM (2018) Centro Esperienze Idrodinamiche Marina Militare: Cavitation tunnel. http://www.insean.cnr.it/en/content/ceimm-cavitation-tunnel. Accessed 31 May 2018
  11. Cossali GE, Coghe A, Araneo L (2001) Near-field entrainment in an impulsively started turbulent gas jet. AIAA J 39(6):1113–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costantini M (2016) Experimental analysis of geometric, pressure gradient and surface temperature effects on boundary-layer transition in compressible high Reynolds number flows. PhD Thesis, RWTH AachenGoogle Scholar
  13. Costantini M, Fey U, Henne U, Klein C (2015) Nonadiabatic surface effects on transition measurements using temperature-sensitive paints. AIAA J 53(5):1172–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costantini M, Hein S, Henne U, Klein C, Koch S, Schojda L, Ondrus V, Schröder W (2016) Pressure gradient and non-adiabatic surface effects on boundary-layer transition. AIAA J 54(11):3465–3480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhawan S, Narasimha R (1958) Some properties of boundary layer flow during the transition from laminar to turbulent motion. J Fluid Mech 3:418–436.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112058000094 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Délery J (2013) Three-dimensional separated flows topology: singular points, beam splitters and vortex structures. Focus series in Fluid Mechanics. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dovgal AV, Kozlov VV, Michalke A (1994) Laminar boundary layer separation: instability and associated phenomena. Progr Aerosp Sci 30(1):61–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eckelmann H (1974) The structure of the viscous sublayer and the adjacent wall region in a turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 65(3):439–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fey U, Engler R, Egami Y, Iijima Y, Asai K, Jansen U, Quest J (2003) Transition detection by temperature sensitive paint at cryogenic temperatures in the european transonic wind tunnel (etw). In: ICIASF record, international congress on instrumentation in aerospace simulation facilities, pp 77–88Google Scholar
  20. Fujisawa N, Oguma Y, Nakano T (2009) Measurements of wall-shear-stress distribution on a NACA0018 airfoil by liquid-crystal coating and near-wall particle image velocimetry (PIV). Meas Sci Technol 20(6):065403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gad-El-Hak M, Davis SH, Mcmurray JT, Orszag SA (1984) On the stability of the decelerating laminar boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 138:297–323.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112084000136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gao L, Yu S (2015) Starting jets and vortex ring pinch-off., vortex rings and jets. In: Fluid mechanics and its applications, vol. 111. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardner AD, Richter K (2015) Boundary layer transition determination for periodic and static flows using phase-averaged pressure data. Exp Fluids 56(6):119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gardner AD, Wolf CC, Raffel M (2016) A new method of dynamic and static stall detection using infrared thermography. Exp Fluids 57(149):149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaster M (1966) The structure and behavior of laminar separation bubbles. AGARD CP–4:813–854Google Scholar
  26. Genç MS, Karasu I, Hakan Açikel H (2012) An experimental study on aerodynamics of NACA2415 aerofoil at low Re numbers. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 39:252–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geng C, He G, Wang Y, Xu C, Lozano-Durán A, Wallace JM (2015) Taylor’s hypothesis in turbulent channel flow considered using a transport equation analysis. Phys Fluids 27(2):025111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerakopulos R, Boutilier MSH, Yarusevych S (2010) Aerodynamic characterization of a NACA 0018 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. In: 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  29. Gulum TO, Erdogan AY, Durak Ata L, Yildirim T, Pace PE (2017) Enhanced LPI waveform representation by ambiguity-domain elliptical gaussian filtering. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 53(2):762–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hain R, Kähler CJ, Radespiel R (2009) Dynamics of laminar separation bubbles at low-Reynolds-number aerofoils. J Fluid Mech 630:129–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hatman A, Wang T (1998) Separated-flow transition. Part 1 - experimental methodology and mode classification. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (Paper)Google Scholar
  32. Hatman A, Wang T (1998) Separated-flow transition. Part 2 - Experimental results. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (Paper)Google Scholar
  33. Hatman A, Wang T (1998) Separated-flow transition. Part 3–primary modes and vortex dynamics. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, 1Google Scholar
  34. Hetsroni G, Tiselj I, Bergant R, Mosyak A, Pogrebnyak E (2004) Convection velocity of temperature fluctuations in a turbulent flume. J Heat Transf 126(5):843–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hilfer M, Dufhaus S, Yorita D, Klein C, Petersen A (2017) Application of pressure and temperature sensitive paint on a highly loaded turbine guide vane in a transonic linear cascade. In: Proceedings of the 1st global power and propulsion forum GPPF 2017, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  36. Hirschel E, Kordulla W, Cousteix J (2014) Three-dimensional attached viscous flow: basic principles and theoretical foundations. Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41378-0
  37. Horn BK, Schunck BG (1981) Determining optical flow. In: 1981 Technical symposium east, 319–331. International Society for Optics and PhotonicsGoogle Scholar
  38. Istvan MS, Yarusevych S (2018) Effects of free-stream turbulence intensity on transition in a laminar separation bubble formed over an airfoil. Exp Fluids 59(3):52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2511-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jagadeesh CS, Balthazar M, Gross A, Fasel H (2013) Experimental investigation of the structure and dynamics of laminar separation bubbles at the onset of bursting. In: 31st AIAA applied aerodynamics conferenceGoogle Scholar
  40. Johansson AV, Alfredsson PH, Kim J (1991) Evolution and dynamics of shear-layer structures in near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech 224:579–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones LE, Sandberg RD, Sandham ND (2008) Direct numerical simulations of forced and unforced separation bubbles on an airfoil at incidence. J Fluid Mech 602:175–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Joseph LA, Borgoltz A, Devenport W (2016) Infrared thermography for detection of laminar-turbulent transition in low-speed wind tunnel testing. Exp Fluids 57(5):77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Karasu I, Genc MS, Acikel H, Akpolat MT (2012) An experimental study on laminar separation bubble and transition over an aerofoil at low Reynolds number. In: Proceedings of the 30th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, vol. 1.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-3030
  44. Kim J, Hussain F (1993) Propagation velocity of perturbations in turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids A 5(3):695–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kirk TM, Yarusevych S (2017) Vortex shedding within laminar separation bubbles forming over an airfoil. Exp Fluids 58(5):43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Koenderink JJ (1984) The structure of images. Biol Cybern 50(5):363–370MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kurelek JW, Lambert AR, Yarusevych S (2016) Coherent structures in the transition process of a laminar separation bubble. J Aircr 53(4):2295–2309Google Scholar
  48. Kurits I, Lewis MJ (2009) Global temperature-sensitive paint system for heat transfer measurements in long-duration hypersonic flows. J Thermophys Heat Transf 23(2):256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lamb H (1975) Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Lambert AR, Yarusevych S (2017) Characterization of vortex dynamics in a laminar separation bubble. Exp Fluids 55(8):2664–2675Google Scholar
  51. Lang M, Rist U, Wagner S (2004) Investigations on controlled transition development in a laminar separation bubble by means of LDA and PIV. Exp Fluids 36(1):43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lang W, Gardner AD, Mariappan S, Klein C, Raffel M (2015) Boundary-layer transition on a rotor blade measured by temperature-sensitive paint, thermal imaging and image derotation. Exp Fluids 56(6):118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee T, Gerontakos P (2004) Investigation of flow over an oscillating airfoil. J Fluid Mech 512:313–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lee T, Su YY (2011) Lift enhancement and flow structure of airfoil with joint trailing-edge flap and Gurney flap. Exp Fluids 50(6):1671–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lemarechal J, Klein C, Henne U, Puckert DK, Rist U (2018) Transition delay by oblique roughness elements in a blasius boundary-layer flow. In: AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-1057
  56. Lighthill M (1963) Attachment and separation in three-dimensional flow. Laminar Bound Layers 2(6):72–82Google Scholar
  57. Liu T, Sullivan JP (2005) Pressure-and temperature-sensitive paints. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  58. Liu T, Woodiga S (2011) Feasibility of global skin friction diagnostics using temperature sensitive paint. Meas Sci Technol 22(11):115402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu Y, Dang B, Li Y, Lin H, Ma H (2016) Applications of savitzky-golay filter for seismic random noise reduction. Acta Geophysica 64(1):101–124.  https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2015-0062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mahr GmbH (2001) Betriebsanleitung Perthometer S2. Göttingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  61. Maucher U, Rist U, Wagner S (1999) Transitional structures in a laminar separation bubble. In: W. Nitsche, R. Heinemann, H.J. Hilbig (eds) Notes on numerical fluid mechanics II, New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics vol72, pp 307–314Google Scholar
  62. Miozzi M, Capone A, Di Felice F, Klein C, Liu T (2016) Global and local skin friction diagnostics from TSP surface patterns on an underwater cylinder in crossflow. Phys Fluids 28(12):124101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Moens F, Perraud J, Séraudie A, Houdeville R (2006) Transition measurement and prediction on a generic high-lift swept wing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 220(6):589–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Montelpare S, Ricci R (2004) A thermographic method to evaluate the local boundary layer separation phenomena on aerodynamic bodies operating at low Reynolds number. Int J Therm Sci 43(3):315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ol MV, McAuliffe BR, Hanff ES, Scholz U, Kähler C (2005) Comparison of laminar separation bubble measurements on a low Reynolds number airfoil in three facilities. In: 35th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibitGoogle Scholar
  66. O’meara MM, Mueller TJ (1987) Laminar separation bubble characteristics on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J 25(8):1033–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ondrus V, Meier R, Klein C, Henne U, Schäferling M, Beifuss U (2015) Europium 1,3-di(thienyl)propane-1,3-diones with outstanding properties for temperature sensing. Sens Actuators A Phys 233:434–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2015.07.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Popov AV, Botez RM, Labib M (2008) Transition point detection from the surface pressure distribution for controller design. J Aircr 45(1):23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Risius S, Beck WH, Klein C, Henne U, Wagner A (2017) Determination of heat transfer into a wedge model in a hypersonic flow using temperature-sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 58(9):117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rist U (1998) Zur instabilität und transition in laminaren Ablöseblasen. Habilitation. Shaker Verlag, AachenGoogle Scholar
  71. Rist U (2005) Instability and transition mechanisms in laminar separation bubbles. In: RTO-EN-AVT-104:5–1–5–29Google Scholar
  72. Rist U, Augustin K (2006) Control of laminar separation bubbles using instability waves. AIAA J 44(10):2217–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rodríguez D, Theofilis V (2010) Structural changes of laminar separation bubbles induced by global linear instability. J Fluid Mech 655:280–305MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sadeh WZ, Brauer HJ (1980) A visual investigation of turbulence in stagnation flow about a circular cylinder. J Fluid Mech 99(01):53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Salvatore F, Pereira F, Felli M, Calcagni D, Di Felice F (2006) Description of the INSEAN E779A propeller experimental dataset. Tech. Rep. INSEAN 2006-085, INSEAN-Italian Ship Model BasinGoogle Scholar
  76. Schafer RW (2011) What is a Savitzky-Golay filter? IEEE Signal Process Mag 28(4):111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sharma DM, Poddar K (2010) Experimental investigations of laminar separation bubble for a flow past an airfoil. Proc ASME Turbo Expo 6:1167–1173Google Scholar
  78. Spalart PR, Strelets MK (2000) Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble. J Fluid Mech 403:329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Surana A, Grunberg O, Haller G (2006) Exact theory of three-dimensional flow separation. Part 1. Steady separation. J Fluid Mech 564:57–103MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tropea C, Yarin AL, Foss JF (2007) Springer handbook of experimental fluid mechanics, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang S, Zhou Y, Alam MM, Yang H (2014) Turbulent intensity and Reynolds number effects on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Phys Fluids 26(11):115107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Watkins AN, Buck GM, Leighty BD, Lipford WE, Oglesby DM (2008) Using pressure-and temperature-sensitive paint for global surface pressure and temperature measurements on the aft-body of a capsule reentry vehicle. In: AIAA Paper 2008-1230Google Scholar
  83. Wolf E, Kähler CJ, Troolin DR, Kykal C, Lai W (2011) Time-resolved volumetric particle tracking velocimetry of large-scale vortex structures from the reattachment region of a laminar separation bubble to the wake. Exp Fluids 50(1):977–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yang K, Ferziger JH (1992) Numerical studies of natural transition in a decelerating boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 240:433–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yang Z, Voke PR (2001) Large-eddy simulation of boundary-layer separation and transition at a change of surface curvature. J Fluid Mech 439:305–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yoon SS, Heister SD (2004) Analytical formulas for the velocity field induced by an infinitely thin vortex ring. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 44(6):665–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yorita D, Asai K, Klein C, Henne U, Schaber S(2012) Transition detection on rotating propeller blades by means oftemperature-sensitive paint. In: Proceedings of the 50th AIAAAerospace sciences meeting, pp 2012–1187Google Scholar
  88. Yuan W, Khalid M, Windte J, Scholz U, Radespiel R (2005) An investigation of low-Reynolds-number flows past airfoils. In: Collection of technical papers - AIAA applied aerodynamics conference 1, pp 102–120Google Scholar
  89. Zhang DH, Chew YT, Winoto SH (1996) Investigation of intermittency measurement methods for transitional boundary layer flows. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 12(4):433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhong S (2002) Detection of flow separation and reattachment using shear-sensitive liquid crystals. Exp Fluids 32(6):667–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zifeng Y, Haan FL, Hu H, Hongwei M (2007) An experimental investigation on the flow separation on a low-Reynolds-number airfoil. In: Collection of technical papers - 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, 5:3421–3431Google Scholar
  92. Zilli J, Sutton D, Lavoie P (2017) Effect of freestream turbulence on laminar separation bubbles and flow transition on an SD7003 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. In: AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meetingGoogle Scholar
  93. Zimmermann B, Kohler A (2013) Optimizing Savitzky-Golay parameters for improving spectral resolution and quantification in infrared spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 67(8):892–902.  https://doi.org/10.1366/12-06723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNR-INM (formerly INSEAN), Marine Technology InstituteRomeItaly
  2. 2.German Aerospace Center (DLR)GöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations