Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 59:170 | Cite as

Effects of ground roughness on near-surface flow field of a tornado-like vortex

  • Alireza Razavi
  • Wei Zhang
  • Partha P. Sarkar
Research Article
  • 134 Downloads

Abstract

Roughness of a terrain is an important parameter that influences the near-ground flow field of tornadoes. In this study, both stationary and translating tornado-like vortices were simulated in a laboratory to investigate the influence of ground roughness on their flow fields. The near-ground flow fields, over the smooth and rough terrains, were studied using a mini version (1:3-scale) of the ISU tornado simulator and a 2D-PIV system for a stationary tornado and using the ISU tornado simulator and a pressure-based anemometer for a translating tornado. Main goal of this study is to examine the influence of ground roughness on tornado flow field. The results show that, for the stationary tornado, the flow regime transitioned from a multi-celled core structure over a smooth terrain at a higher swirl ratio to a single or dual-celled core structure over the rough terrain. A significant decrease in tangential velocity and core radius, and an increase in vertical and radial velocities and turbulent kinetic energy near the center of the tornado were also observed. For the translating tornado, ground roughness reduced the core radius, increased the radial velocity toward the center of rotation, and moved the location of the maximum horizontal velocity toward the front side of the tornado center close to the ground. There was a decrease in local or corner-flow swirl ratio in both stationary and translating tornadoes for the rough terrains compared with the smooth one.

Graphical abstract

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from NOAA (Award number NA06OAR4600230) and NSF (Award number CMMI-1400251).

References

  1. Bluestein BH, Pazmany LA (2000) Observation of tornadoes and other convective phenomena with a mobile 3-mm wavelength Doppler radar: the spring 1999 field experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81:2939–2951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Church CR, Snow JT (1993) Laboratory models of tornadoes. In: Church C, Burgess D, Doswell C, Davies-Jones R (eds) The tornado: its structure, dynamics, prediction, and hazards. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 277–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Church C, Snow JT, Baker GL, Agee EM (1979) Characteristics of tornado-like vortices as a function of swirl ratio: a laboratory investigation. J Atmos Sci 36(9):1755–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dessens J Jr (1972) Influence of ground roughness on tornadoes. A laboratory simulation. J Appl Meteorol 11:72–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond CJ, Wilkins EM (1984) Translation effects on simulated tornadoes. J Atmos Sci 41(17):2574–2580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujita TT (1976) Graphic examples of tornadoes. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 57:401–412Google Scholar
  7. Haan FL, Sarkar PP, Gallus WA (2007) Design, construction and performance of a large tornado simulator for wind engineering applications. Eng Struct.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Karstens CD, Samaras TM, Lee BD, Finley CA (2010) Near-ground pressure and wind measurements in tornadoes. Mon Weather Rev 138:2570–2588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee W, Wurman J (2005) Diagnosed three-dimensional axisymmetric structure of the Mulhall tornado on 3 May 1999. J Atmos Sci 62:2373–2393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leslie FW (1977) Surface roughness effects on suction vortex formation: a laboratory simulation. J Atmos Sci 34(7):1022–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lettau H (1969) Note on aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness-element description. J Appl Meteorol 8:828–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewellen WS (1993) Tornado vortex theory. In: Church C, Burgess D, Doswell C, Davies-Jones R (eds) The tornado: its structure, dynamics, prediction, and hazards, Geophysical monograph series. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 19–39.  https://doi.org/10.1029/GM079p0019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewellen DC (2014) Local roughness effects on tornado dynamics. Local roughness effects on tornado dynamics. In: 27th Conference on severe local storms, paper 15A. American Meteor Society, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewellen WS, Sheng YP (1979) Influence of surface conditions on tornado wind distributions. In: 11th Conference on severe local storms. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 375–381 (preprints) Google Scholar
  15. Lewellen WS, Lewellen DC, Sykes RI (1997) Large-eddy simulation of a tornado’s interaction with the surface. J Atmos Sci 54(5):581–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewellen DC, Lewellen WS, Xia J (2000) The influence of a local swirl ratio on tornado intensification near the surface. J Atmos Sci 57:527–544MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu Z, Ishihara T (2016) Study of the effects of translation and roughness on tornado-like vortices by large-eddy simulations. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 151:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lund DE, Snow JT (1993) Laser Doppler velocimetry measurements in tornado-like vortices. In: Church C, Burgess D, Doswell C, Davies-Jones R (eds) The tornado: its structure, dynamics, prediction, and hazards. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matsui M, Tamura Y (2009) Influence of incident flow conditions on generation of tornado-like flow. In: Proceeding of the 11th American conference on wind engineering, Puerto RicoGoogle Scholar
  20. Monji N, Wang Y (1989) A laboratory investigation of the characteristics of tornado-like vortices over various rough surfaces. Acta Meteorol Sin 3:506–515Google Scholar
  21. Natarajan D, Hangan H (2012) Large eddy simulations of translation and surface roughness effects on tornado-like vortices. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 104–106:577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raupach MR, Antonia RA, Rajagopalan S (1991) Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. Appl Mech Rev 44(1):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Razavi A, Sarkar PP (2016) Laboratory investigation of the effect of tornado translation on its near-ground flow field. In: Proceeding of the 8th international colloquium on bluff body aerodynamics and applications, 7–11 June, 2016, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Razavi A, Sarkar PP (2018a) Laboratory investigation of the effects of translation on the near-ground tornado flow field. Wind Struct 26(3):179–190Google Scholar
  25. Razavi A, Sarkar PP (2018b) Laboratory study of topography effects on the near-ground tornado flow field. J Bound Layer Meteorol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0347-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarkar PP, Kardell R, Haan FL, Gallus WA (2003) Design of ISU tornado vortex simulator. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on wind engineering, Lubbock, Texas, June 2–5Google Scholar
  27. Sarkar PP, Haan FL, Gallus WA, Le K, Wurman J (2005) Velocity measurements in a laboratory tornado simulator and their comparison with numerical and full-scale data. In: Proceedings of the 37th US–Japan panel on wind and seismic effects joint meeting, Tsukuba, Japan, May 16–18Google Scholar
  28. Wang J, Cao S, Pang W, Cao J (2017) Experimental study on effects of ground roughness on flow characteristics of tornado-like vortices. Bound Layer Meteorol 162(2):319–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang W, Sarkar PP (2008) Effects of ground roughness on tornado like vortex using PIV. In: Proceedings of the AAWE workshop, Vail, COGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang W, Sarkar PP (2009) Influence of surrounding buildings on tornado-induced wind loads of a low-rise building. In: Proceedings of the 11th Americas conference on wind engineering, San Juan, Puerto Rico, June 22, 2009Google Scholar
  31. Zhang W, Sarkar PP (2012) Near-ground tornado-like vortex structure resolved by particle image velocimetry (PIV). Exp Fluids 52:479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations