Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 59:2 | Cite as

Impact of mismatched and misaligned laser light sheet profiles on PIV performance

  • K. Grayson
  • C. M. de Silva
  • N. Hutchins
  • I. Marusic
Research Article

Abstract

The effect of mismatched or misaligned laser light sheet profiles on the quality of particle image velocimetry (PIV) results is considered in this study. Light sheet profiles with differing widths, shapes, or alignment can reduce the correlation between PIV images and increase experimental errors. Systematic PIV simulations isolate these behaviours to assess the sensitivity and implications of light sheet mismatch on measurements. The simulations in this work use flow fields from a turbulent boundary layer; however, the behaviours and impacts of laser profile mismatch are highly relevant to any fluid flow or PIV application. Experimental measurements from a turbulent boundary layer facility are incorporated, as well as additional simulations matched to experimental image characteristics, to validate the synthetic image analysis. Experimental laser profiles are captured using a modular laser profiling camera, designed to quantify the distribution of laser light sheet intensities and inform any corrective adjustments to an experimental configuration. Results suggest that an offset of just 1.35 standard deviations in the Gaussian light sheet intensity distributions can cause a 40% reduction in the average correlation coefficient and a 45% increase in spurious vectors. Errors in measured flow statistics are also amplified when two successive laser profiles are no longer well matched in alignment or intensity distribution. Consequently, an awareness of how laser light sheet overlap influences PIV results can guide faster setup of an experiment, as well as achieve superior experimental measurements.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Australian Research Council and the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship for their financial support of this research.

References

  1. Adrian RJ, Westerweel J (2011) Particle image velocimetry. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrèbe Y, Behn R, Duval BP, Etienne P, Pitzschke A (2011) Use of webcams as tools for alignment and supervision of a Thomson scattering system in the near infrared. Fusion Eng Des 86(6):1273–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blinde PL, Lynch KP, Schrijer FFJ, Van Oudheusden BW (2015) Determination of instantaneous pressure in a transonic base flow using four-pulse tomographic PIV. In: 11th International Symposium on Particle Image VelocimetryGoogle Scholar
  4. Brücker C, Hess D, Kitzhofer J (2012) Single-view volumetric PIV via high-resolution scanning, isotropic voxel restructuring and 3D least-squares matching (3D-LSM). Meas Sci Technol 24(2):024001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cignoli F, De Iuliis S, Zizak G (2004) A webcam as a light probe beam profiler. Appl Spectrosc 58(11):1372–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coffin D (2008) DCRAW: Decoding raw digital photos in LinuxGoogle Scholar
  7. de Silva CM, Baidya R, Khashehchi M, Marusic I (2012) Assessment of tomographic PIV in wall-bounded turbulence using direct numerical simulation data. Exp Fluids 52(2):425–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Silva CM, Squire DT, Hutchins N, Marusic I (2015) Towards capturing large scale coherent structures in boundary layers using particle image velocimetry. In: 7th Australian Conference on Laser Diagnostics in Fluid Mechanics and CombustionGoogle Scholar
  9. Elsinga GE, Van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2006) Experimental assessment of tomographic-PIV accuracy. In: 13th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid MechanicsGoogle Scholar
  10. Fond B, Abram C, Beyrau F (2015) On the characterisation of tracer particles for thermographic particle image velocimetry. Appl Phys B 118(3):393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ganapathisubramani B, Longmire EK, Marusic I, Pothos S (2005) Dual-plane PIV technique to determine the complete velocity gradient tensor in a turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 39(2):222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grayson K, de Silva CM, Hutchins N, Marusic I (2017) Beam stability and warm-up effects of Nd:YAG lasers used in particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 28(6):065301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kähler CJ, Kompenhans J (2000) Fundamentals of multiple plane stereo particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29(1):S070–S077Google Scholar
  14. Keane RD, Adrian RJ (1992) Theory of cross-correlation analysis of PIV images. Appl Sci Res 49(3):191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langer G, Hochreiner A, Burgholzer P, Berer T (2013) A webcam in Bayer-mode as a light beam profiler for the near infra-red. Optics Lasers Eng 51(5):571–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis JP (1995) Fast normalized cross-correlation. Vis Interface 10:120–123Google Scholar
  17. Mistry D, Dawson J (2014) Experimental investigation of multi-scale entrainment processes of a turbulent jet. In: 17th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid MechanicsGoogle Scholar
  18. Mullin JA, Dahm WJA (2005) Dual-plane stereo particle image velocimetry (DSPIV) for measuring velocity gradient fields at intermediate and small scales of turbulent flows. Exp Fluids 38(2):185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naka Y, Tomita K, Shimura M, Fukushima N, Tanahashi M, Miyauchi T (2016) Quad-plane stereoscopic PIV for fine-scale structure measurements in turbulence. Exp Fluids 57(5):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nickels TB, Marusic I, Hafez S, Chong MS (2005) Evidence of the -1-law in a high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layer. Phys Rev Lett 95(7):074501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nobach H (2011) Influence of individual variations of particle image intensities on high-resolution PIV. Exp Fluids 50(4):919–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nobach H, Bodenschatz E (2009) Limitations of accuracy in PIV due to individual variations of particle image intensities. Exp Fluids 47(1):27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfadler S, Dinkelacker F, Beyrau F, Leipertz A (2009) High resolution dual-plane stereo-PIV for validation of subgrid scale models in large-eddy simulations of turbulent premixed flames. Combust Flame 156(8):1552–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scarano F, Elsinga GE, Bocci E, van Oudheusden BW (2006) Investigation of 3-D coherent structures in the turbulent cylinder wake using tomo-PIV. In: 13th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid MechanicsGoogle Scholar
  25. Scharnowski S, Kähler CJ (2016) Estimation and optimization of loss-of-pair uncertainties based on PIV correlation functions. Exp Fluids 57(2):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scharnowski S, Grayson K, de Silva CM, Hutchins N, Marusic I, Kähler CJ (2017) Generalization of the PIV loss-of-correlation formula introduced by Keane and Adrian. Exp Fluids 58(10):150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sillero JA, Jiménez J, Moser RD (2013) One-point statistics for turbulent wall-bounded flows at Reynolds numbers up to \(\delta +\) 2000. Phys Fluids 25(10):105102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Westerweel J (1993) Digital particle image velocimetry. PhD thesis, Delft UniversityGoogle Scholar
  29. Westerweel J (2000) Theoretical analysis of the measurement precision in particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29(1):S003–S012Google Scholar
  30. Westerweel J, Scarano F (2005) Universal outlier detection for PIV data. Exp Fluids 39(6):1096–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wieneke B (2005) Stereo-PIV using self-calibration on particle images. Exp Fluids 39(2):267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Worth NA, Nickels TB, Swaminathan N (2010) A tomographic PIV resolution study based on homogeneous isotropic turbulence DNS data. Exp Fluids 49(3):637–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations