Impact of mismatched and misaligned laser light sheet profiles on PIV performance
- 414 Downloads
The effect of mismatched or misaligned laser light sheet profiles on the quality of particle image velocimetry (PIV) results is considered in this study. Light sheet profiles with differing widths, shapes, or alignment can reduce the correlation between PIV images and increase experimental errors. Systematic PIV simulations isolate these behaviours to assess the sensitivity and implications of light sheet mismatch on measurements. The simulations in this work use flow fields from a turbulent boundary layer; however, the behaviours and impacts of laser profile mismatch are highly relevant to any fluid flow or PIV application. Experimental measurements from a turbulent boundary layer facility are incorporated, as well as additional simulations matched to experimental image characteristics, to validate the synthetic image analysis. Experimental laser profiles are captured using a modular laser profiling camera, designed to quantify the distribution of laser light sheet intensities and inform any corrective adjustments to an experimental configuration. Results suggest that an offset of just 1.35 standard deviations in the Gaussian light sheet intensity distributions can cause a 40% reduction in the average correlation coefficient and a 45% increase in spurious vectors. Errors in measured flow statistics are also amplified when two successive laser profiles are no longer well matched in alignment or intensity distribution. Consequently, an awareness of how laser light sheet overlap influences PIV results can guide faster setup of an experiment, as well as achieve superior experimental measurements.
The authors wish to thank the Australian Research Council and the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship for their financial support of this research.
- Blinde PL, Lynch KP, Schrijer FFJ, Van Oudheusden BW (2015) Determination of instantaneous pressure in a transonic base flow using four-pulse tomographic PIV. In: 11th International Symposium on Particle Image VelocimetryGoogle Scholar
- Coffin D (2008) DCRAW: Decoding raw digital photos in LinuxGoogle Scholar
- de Silva CM, Squire DT, Hutchins N, Marusic I (2015) Towards capturing large scale coherent structures in boundary layers using particle image velocimetry. In: 7th Australian Conference on Laser Diagnostics in Fluid Mechanics and CombustionGoogle Scholar
- Elsinga GE, Van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2006) Experimental assessment of tomographic-PIV accuracy. In: 13th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid MechanicsGoogle Scholar
- Kähler CJ, Kompenhans J (2000) Fundamentals of multiple plane stereo particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29(1):S070–S077Google Scholar
- Lewis JP (1995) Fast normalized cross-correlation. Vis Interface 10:120–123Google Scholar
- Mistry D, Dawson J (2014) Experimental investigation of multi-scale entrainment processes of a turbulent jet. In: 17th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid MechanicsGoogle Scholar
- Scarano F, Elsinga GE, Bocci E, van Oudheusden BW (2006) Investigation of 3-D coherent structures in the turbulent cylinder wake using tomo-PIV. In: 13th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid MechanicsGoogle Scholar
- Westerweel J (1993) Digital particle image velocimetry. PhD thesis, Delft UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Westerweel J (2000) Theoretical analysis of the measurement precision in particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29(1):S003–S012Google Scholar