Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 58:26 | Cite as

Effect of instantaneous stirring process on mixing between initially distant scalars in turbulent obstacle wakes

  • F. Shoaei
  • J. P. Crimaldi
Research Article
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

A two-channel planar laser-induced fluorescence technique is used to study mixing and reactions between two initially distant scalars in the turbulent wake of a cylindrical obstacle. The scalars are released continuously and isokinetically upstream of the cylinder, with a lateral separation that initially impedes mixing between them. The effect of the turbulent wake on mixing and reaction enhancement is determined by measuring the segregation parameter for cases with and without the cylinder obstruction. Results indicate that scalar mixing and reaction rates (in the low-Damkohler limit) increase significantly in the presence of the cylinder wake. The study also shows that the dominant contribution of total reaction derives from the scalar covariance associated with instantaneous flow processes, and depends strongly on streamwise location within the wake. The results have broad implications for mixing processes in engineering and ecology.

Keywords

Distant Scalar Downstream Location Turbulent Wake Instantaneous Process Transverse Profile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants No. 0849695 and 1205816.

References

  1. Adrian R, Christensen K, Liu ZC (2000) Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp Fluids 29(3):275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrian RJ (2007) Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence a. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 19(4):041301CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Batchelor G (1959) Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity. J Fluid Mech 5(01):113–133MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Breidenthal R (1981) Structure in turbulent mixing layers and wakes using a chemical reaction. J Fluid Mech 109:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantwell BJ (1981) Organized motion in turbulent flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13(1):457–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Celik B, Beskok A (2009) Mixing induced by a transversely oscillating circular cylinder in a straight channel. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 21(7):073601CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Crimaldi JP (2008) Planar laser induced fluorescence in aqueous flows. Exp Fluids 44(6):851–863. doi: 10.1007/s00348-008-0496-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crimaldi JP, Browning HS (2004) A proposed mechanism for turbulent enhancement of broadcast spawning efficiency. J Mar Syst 49(1–4):3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crimaldi JP, Kawakami TR (2013) Reaction of initially distant scalars in a cylinder wake. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 25(5):053604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crimaldi JP, Zimmer RK (2014) The physics of broadcast spawning in benthic invertebrates. Ann Rev Mar Sci 6:141–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crimaldi JP, Hartford JR, Weiss JB (2006) Reaction enhancement of point sources due to vortex stirring. Phys Rev E 74(1):016307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crimaldi JP, Cadwell JR, Weiss JB (2008) Reaction enhancement of isolated scalars by vortex stirring. Phys Fluids 20(073):605zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Deshmukh SR, Vlachos DG (2005) Novel micromixers driven by flow instabilities: application to post-reactors. AIChE J 51(12):3193–3204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong C, McWilliams JC (2007) A numerical study of island wakes in the Southern California Bight. Cont Shelf Res 27(9):1233–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dong C, McWilliams JC, Shchepetkin AF (2007) Island wakes in deep water. J Phys Oceanogr 37(4):962–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrier G, Davies P, Anderson J (1996) Cover remote sensing observations of a vortex street downstream of an obstacle in an estuarine flow. Int J Remote Sens 17(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Froncioni AM, Muzzio FJ, Peskin RL, Swanson PD (1997) Chaotic motion of fluid and solid particles in plane wakes. Chaos Solitons Fractals 8(1):109–130CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Garrett C (1983) On the initial streakness of a dispersing tracer in two-and three-dimensional turbulence. Dyn Atmos Oceans 7(4):265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guichard F, Bourget E (1998) Topographic heterogeneity, hydrodynamics, and benthic community structure: a scale-dependent cascade. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 171:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hasegawa D, Yamazaki H, Lueck RG, Seuront L (2004) How islands stir and fertilize the upper ocean. Geophys Res Lett 31(16). doi: 10.1029/2004GL020143
  21. Heywood KJ, Barton ED, Simpson JH (1990) The effects of flow disturbance by an oceanic island. J Mar Res 48(1):55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hinch E (1999) Mixing: turbulence and chaos—an introduction. In: Mixing, Springer, pp 37–56Google Scholar
  23. Jackson J (1986) Modes of dispersal of clonal benthic invertebrates: consequences for species’ distributions and genetic structure of local populations. Bull Mar Sci 39(2):588–606Google Scholar
  24. Jung C, Tél T, Ziemniak E (1993) Application of scattering chaos to particle transport in a hydrodynamical flow. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 3(4):555–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Károlyi G, Péntek Á, Toroczkai Z, Tél T, Grebogi C (1999) Chemical or biological activity in open chaotic flows. Phys Rev E 59(5):5468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Károlyi G, Péntek A, Scheuring I, Tél T, Toroczkai Z (2000) Chaotic flow: the physics of species coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 97, No. 25, pp 13661–13665Google Scholar
  27. Kastrinakis E, Nychas S (1998) Mixing at high Schmidt numbers in the near wake of a circular cylinder. Chem Eng Sci 53(23):3977–3989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mao KW, Toor HL (1971) Second-order chemical reactions with turbulent mixing. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 10(2):192–197. doi: 10.1021/i160038a002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mi J, Zhou Y, Nathan GJ (2004) The effect of reynolds number on the passive scalar field in the turbulent wake of a circular cylinder. Flow Turbul Combust 72(2–4):311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller K, Mundy C (2003) Rapid settlement in broadcast spawning corals: implications for larval dispersal. Coral Reefs 22(2):99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pratt KR, Meiss JD, Crimaldi JP (2015) Reaction enhancement of initially distant scalars by Lagrangian coherent structures. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 27(3):035106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richards K (1990) Physical processes in the benthic boundary layer. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 331(1616):3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richards KJ, Brentnall SJ (2006) The impact of diffusion and stirring on the dynamics of interacting populations. J Theor Biol 238(2):340–347MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sandulescu M, López C, Hernández-García E, Feudel U (2008) Plankton blooms in vortices: the role of biological and hydrodynamic time scales. arXiv:08023973 (preprint)
  35. Scheuring I, KÁrolyi G, PÉntek A, TÉl T, Toroczkai Z (2000) A model for resolving the plankton paradox: coexistence in open flows. Freshw Biol 45(2):123–132Google Scholar
  36. Scheuring I, Károlyi G, Toroczkai Z, Tél T, Péntek A (2003) Competing populations in flows with chaotic mixing. Theor Popul Biol 63(2):77–90CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Soltys MA, Crimaldi JP (2015) Joint probabilities and mixing of isolated scalars emitted from parallel jets. J Fluid Mech 769:130–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soltys MA, Crimaldi JP (2011) Scalar interactions between parallel jets measured using a two-channel PLIF technique. Exp Fluids. doi: 10.1007/s00348-010-1019-5 Google Scholar
  39. Tel T, Károlyi G, Péntek A, Scheuring I, Toroczkai Z, Grebogi C, Kadtke J (2000) Chaotic advection, diffusion, and reactions in open flows. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 10(1):89–98MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Toroczkai Z, Károlyi G, Péntek Á, Tél T, Grebogi C (1998) Advection of active particles in open chaotic flows. Phys Rev Lett 80(3):500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang CT, Hu YC (2010) Mixing of liquids using obstacles in y-type microchannels. Tamkang J Sci Eng 13:385–394Google Scholar
  42. Ziemniak EM, Jung C, Tél T (1994) Tracer dynamics in open hydrodynamical flows as chaotic scattering. Phys D Nonlinear Phenom 76(1):123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations