Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 57:125 | Cite as

Planar shock wave sliding over a water layer

  • V. RodriguezEmail author
  • G. Jourdan
  • A. Marty
  • A. Allou
  • J.-D. Parisse
Letter

Abstract

In this work, we conduct experiments to study the interaction between a horizontal free water layer and a planar shock wave that is sliding over it. Experiments are performed at atmospheric pressure in a shock tube with a square cross section (\(200\times 200\,\hbox {mm}^2\)) for depths of 10, 20, and 30 mm; a 1500-mm-long water layer; and two incident planar shock waves having Mach numbers of 1.11 and 1.43. We record the pressure histories and high-speed visualizations to study the flow patterns, surface waves, and spray layers behind the shock wave. We observe two different flow patterns with ripples formed at the air–water interface for the weaker shock wave and the dispersion of a droplet mist for the stronger shock wave. From the pressure signals, we extract the delay time between the arrival of the compression wave into water and the shock wave in air at the same location. We show that the delay time evolves with the distance traveled over the water layer, the depth of the water layer, and the Mach number of the shock wave.

Keywords

Shock Wave Mach Number Water Layer Shock Tube Compression Wave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by CEA Cadarache under Contract #4000649074 CJN-001

References

  1. Bitter NP, Shepherd JE (2013) Detonation and transition to detonation in partially water-filled pipes. J Press Vessel Technol 135:031203-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borisov AA, Kogarko SM, Lyubimov AV (1965) Sliding of detonation and shock waves over liquid surfaces. Combust Explos Shock Waves 1:31–38Google Scholar
  3. Borisov AA, Gel’fand BE, Sherpanev SM, Timofeev EI (1981) Mechanism for mixture formation behind a shock sliding over a fluid surface. Combust Explos Shock Waves 17:86–93Google Scholar
  4. Epstein M, Fauske HK, Kubo S, Nakamura T, Koyama K (2001) Liquid entrainment by an expanding core disruptive accident bubble—a Kelvin–Helmholtz phenomenon. Nucl Eng Des 210:53–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henderson LF, Ma J-H, Sakurai A, Takayama K (1990) Refraction of a shock wave at an air–water interface. Fluid Dyn Res 5:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Houas L, Jourdan G, Schwaederlé L, Carrey R, Diaz F (2003) A new large cross-section shock tube for studies of turbulent mixing induced by interfacial hydrodynamic instability. Shock Waves 13:431–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Milton BE, Behnia M, Takayama K (1991) Interaction of liquid films with shock induced airflows. In: Proceedings of the 18th international symposium on shock waves held at Sendai Japan, vol 2, pp 1265–1270Google Scholar
  8. Teodorczyk A, Shepherd JE (2012) Interaction of a shock wave with a water layer, technical report no. FM2012-002, Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  9. Yarin AL (2006) Drop impact dynamics: splashing, spreading, receding, bouncing. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 38:159–192MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Yarin AL, Weiss DA (1995) Impact of drops on solid surfaces: self-similar capillary waves, and splashing as a new type of kinematic discontinuity. J Fluid Mech 283:141–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Rodriguez
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Jourdan
    • 1
  • A. Marty
    • 1
  • A. Allou
    • 2
  • J.-D. Parisse
    • 1
  1. 1.CNRS, IUSTI UMR 7343Aix-Marseille UniversitéMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.CEA, DEN, Cadarache, DTN/STCP/LTRSSaint Paul lez Durance CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations