Effects of surface-active impurities on the liquid bridge dynamics

Research Article

Abstract

We examine experimentally the effects of surface-active impurities on the small-amplitude free oscillations of axisymmetric liquid bridges. The surface tension, oscillation frequency, and damping rate are measured at different instants from the free surface formation. The experiments with n-hexadecane and n-dodecane show that none of these interfacial quantities is significantly affected by the free surface age. The damping rates exceed by a \(\mathcal{O}(1)\) quantity their corresponding values for a clean free surface. This extra-damping can be modeled in terms of the monolayer shear viscosity exclusively. Similar values of this quantity are obtained for n-hexadecane and n-dodecane, although the impurity effects on the surface tension are much greater in the first case. We conducted experiments with deionized water liquid bridges to analyze the impurity effects on free surfaces with high elasticity numbers, where Marangoni convection is expected to increase the monolayer dissipation. In this case, the damping rates are up to three times as those of a clean free surface. The monolayer dissipative effects do not increase as the free surface ages, although the surface tension decreases considerably during this process. Similar impurity effects are observed when an anionic surfactant is dissolved in deionized water. For a fixed value of the liquid bridge slenderness, both the oscillation frequency and damping rate are functions of the liquid bridge volume exclusively, independently of the free surface age and the liquid-ambient combination. Extra-dissipation increases sharply as the liquid bridge volume decreases.

References

  1. Boussinesq J (1913) Existence of a superficial viscosity in the thin transition layer separating one liquid from another contiguous fluid. C R Hehbd Seances Acad Sci 156:983–989Google Scholar
  2. Brenn G, Plohl G (2015) The oscillating drop method for measuring the deformation retardation time of viscoelastic liquids. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 223:88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabezas MG, Bateni A, Montanero JM, Neumann AW (2006) Determination of surface tension and contact angle from the shapes of axisymmetric fluid interfaces without use of apex coordinates. Langmuir 22:10,053–10,060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferrera C, Cabezas MG, Montanero JM (2006) An experimental analysis of the linear vibration of axisymmetric liquid bridges. Phys Fluids 18:082, 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrera C, Montanero JM, Cabezas MG (2007) An analysis of the sensitivity of pendant drops and liquid bridges to measure the interfacial tension. Meas Sci Technol 18:3713–3723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henderson DM, Miles JW (1994) Surface-wave damping in a circular cylinder with a fixed contact line. J Fluid Mech 275:285–299MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Herrada MA, Montanero JM (2015) A numerical method to study the dynamics of capillary fluid systems. J Comput Phys. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.048 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Herrada MA, Montanero JM, Vega JM (2011) The effect of surface shear viscosity on the damping of oscillations in millimetric liquid bridges. Phys Fluids 23:082,102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Higuera M, Nicolás J, Vega JM (1994) Linear oscillations of weakly dissipative axisymmetric liquid bridges. Phys Fluids 6:438–450MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Hirsa AH, Lopez JM, Miraghaie R (2001) Measurement and computation of hydrodynamic coupling at an air/water interface with an insoluble monolayer. J Fluid Mech 443:271–292CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Howell DR, Buhrow B, Heath T, McKenna C, Hwang W, Schatz MF (2000) Measurements of surface-wave damping in a container. Phys Fluids 12:322–326CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Jin F, Gupta NR, Stebe KJ (2006) The detachment of a viscous drop in a viscous solution in the presence of a soluble surfactant. Phys Fluids 022103:022,103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liao YC, Subramani HJ, Franses EI, Basaran OA (2004) Effects of soluble surfactants on the deformation and breakup of stretching liquid bridges. Langmuir 20:9926–9930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin SY, Lin YY, Chen EM, Hsu CT, Kwan CC (1999) A study of the equilibrium surface tension and the critical micelle concentration of mixed surfactant solutions. Langmuir 15:4370–4376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lopez JM, Hirsa A (1998) Direct determination of the dependence of the surface shear and dilatational viscosities on the thermodynamic state of the interface: theoretical foundations. J Colloid Interface Sci 206:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lunkenheimer K, Czichocki G, Hirte R, Barzyk W (1995) Novel results on the adsorption of ionic surfactants at the air/water interface-sodium-n-alkyl sulfates. Colloid Surf A 101:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martel C, Knobloch E (1997) Damping of nearly inviscid water waves. Phys Rev E 56:5544–5548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martín E, Vega JM (2006) The effect of surface contamination on the drift instability of standing faraday waves. J Fluid Mech 546:203–225MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Miles JW (1967) Surface-wave damping in closed basins. Proc R Soc Lond A 297:459–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicolás JA, Vega JM (2000) A note of the effect of surface contamination in water wave damping. J Fluid Mech 410:367–373MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Plateau JAF (1869) Experimental and theoretical researches into the figures of equilibrium of a liquid mass without weight. Philos Mag 38:445–455Google Scholar
  22. Popinet S (2003) Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries. J Comput Phys 190:572–600MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Prosser AJ, Franses EI (2001) Adsorption and surface tension of ionic surfactants at the air-water interface: review and evaluation of equilibrium models. Colloids Surf A 178:1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ross S, Becher P (1992) The history of the spreading coefficient. J Colloid Interface Sci 149:575–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scriven LE (1960) Dynamics of a fluid interface: equation of motion for newtonian surface fluids. Chem Eng Sci 12:98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scriven LE, Sternling CV (1960) The Marangoni effects. Nature 187:186–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Slobozhanin LA, Perales JM (1993) Stability of liquid bridges between equal disks in an axial gravity field. Phys Fluids 5:1305–1314CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Stückrad B, Hiller WJ, Kowalewski TA (1993) Measurement of dynamic surface tension by the oscillating droplet method. Exp Fluids 15:332–340Google Scholar
  29. Tsamopoulos J, Chen TY, Borkar A (1992) Viscous oscillations of capillary bridges. J Fluid Mech 235:579–609CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Vega EJ, Montanero JM (2009) Damping of linear oscillations in axisymmetric liquid bridges. Phys Fluids 21:092, 101CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Vega EJ, Montanero JM, Herrada MA, Ferrera C (2014) Dynamics of an axisymmetric liquid bridge close to the minimum-volume stability limit. Phys Rev E 90:013, 015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang L, Kazmierski BK, Hoath SD, Jung S, Hsiao WK, Wang Y, Berson A, Harlen O, Kapur N, Bain CD (2014) Determination of dynamic surface tension and viscosity of non-newtonian fluids from drop oscillations. Phys Fluids 26:113, 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Young YN, Booty MR, Siegel M, Li J (2009) Influence of surfactant solubility on the deformation and breakup of a bubble or capillary jet in a viscous fluid. Phys Fluids 21:072, 105CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ponce-Torres
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. J. Vega
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. M. Montanero
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Energy, and Materials EngineeringUniversity of ExtremaduraBadajozSpain
  2. 2.Instituto de Computación Científica Avanzada (ICCAEx)BadajozSpain

Personalised recommendations