Complex fluids affect low-Reynolds number locomotion in a kinematic-dependent manner

  • Francisco A. Godínez
  • Lyndon Koens
  • Thomas D. Montenegro-Johnson
  • Roberto Zenit
  • Eric Lauga
Research Article

Abstract

In order to improve our understanding of the self-propulsion of swimming microorganisms in viscoelastic fluids, we study experimentally the locomotion of three artificial macro-scale swimmers in Newtonian and synthetic Boger fluids. Each swimmer is made of a rigid head and a tail whose dynamics leads to viscous propulsion. By considering three different kinematics of the tail (helical rigid, planar flexible, and helical flexible) in the same fluid, we demonstrate experimentally that the impact of viscoelasticity on the locomotion speed of the swimmers depends crucially on the kinematics of the tails. Specifically, rigid helical swimmers see no change in their swimming speed, swimmers with planar rod-like flexible tails always swim faster, while those with flexible ribbon-like tails undergoing helical deformation go systematically slower. Our study points to a subtle interplay between tail deformation, actuation, and viscoelastic stresses, and is relevant to the three-dimensional dynamics of flagellated cells in non-Newtonian fluids.

References

  1. Balmforth NJ, Coombs D, Pachmann S (2010) Microelastohydrodynamics of swimming organisms near solid boundaries in complex fluids. Q J Mech Appl Math 63:267–294CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Boger DV (1977) A highly elastic constant-viscosity fluid. J NonNewt Fluid Mech 3:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borazjani I, Sotiropoulos F (2009) Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of anguilliform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes. J Exp Biol 212:576–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borazjani I, Sotiropoulos F (2010) On the role of form and kinematics on the hydrodynamics of body/caudal fin swimming. J Exp Biol 213:89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bray D (2000) Cell movements. Garland Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennen C, Winet H (1977) Fluid mechanics of propulsion by cilia and flagella. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 9:339–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan B, Balmforth NJ, Hosoi AE (2005) Building a better snail: lubrication and adhesive locomotion. Phys Fluids 17(113):101MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaudhury TK (1979) Swimming in a viscoelastic liquid. J Fluid Mech 95:189–197CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Childress S (1981) Mechanics of swimming and flying. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Cortez R, Fauci L, Medovikov A (2005) The method of regularized Stokeslets in three dimensions: analysis, validation, and application to helical swimming. Phys Fluids 17(3):031,504CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Curtis MP, Gaffney EA (2013) Three-sphere swimmer in a nonlinear viscoelastic medium. Phys Rev E 87(043):006Google Scholar
  12. Dasgupta M, Liu B, Fu HC, Berhanu M, Breuer KS, Powers TR, Kudrolli A (2013) Speed of a swimming sheet in newtonian and viscoelastic fluids. Phys Rev E 87(013):015Google Scholar
  13. Dreyfus R, Baudry J, Roper ML, Fermigier M, Stone HA, Bibette J (2005) Microscopic artificial swimmers. Nature 437:862–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Du J, Keener JP, Guy RD, Fogelson AL (2012) Low-Reynolds-number swimming in viscous two-phase fluids. Phys Rev E 85(036):304Google Scholar
  15. Espinosa-Garcia J, Lauga E, Zenit R (2013) Fluid elasticity increases the locomotion of flexible swimmers. Phys Fluids 25(031):701Google Scholar
  16. Fu HC, Powers TR, Wolgemuth HC (2007) Theory of swimming filaments in viscoelastic media. Phys Rev Lett 99:258101–258105Google Scholar
  17. Fu HC, Wolgemuth CW, Powers TR (2009) Swimming speeds of filaments in nonlinearly viscoelastic fluids. Phys Fluids 21(033):102Google Scholar
  18. Fu HC, Shenoy VB, Powers TR (2010) Low-Reynolds-number swimming in gels. Europhys Lett 91(24):002Google Scholar
  19. Fulford GR, Katz DF, Powell RL (1998) Swimming of spermatozoa in a linear viscoelastic fluid. Biorheol 35:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Godinez F, Chavez O, Zenit R (2012) Design of a novel rotating magnetic field device. Rev Sci Inst 83(066):109Google Scholar
  21. Guasto JS, Rusconi R, Stocker R (2012) Fluid mechanics of planktonic microorganisms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44Google Scholar
  22. Holman J (1994) Experimental methods for engineers. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Jahn TL, Votta JJ (1972) Locomotion of protozoa. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 4:93–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson RE (1980) An improved slender-body theory for stokes flow. J Fluid Mech 99(02):411–431CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Keim NC, Garcia M, Arratia PE (2012) Fluid elasticity can enable propulsion at low Reynolds number. Phys Fluids 24(081):703Google Scholar
  26. Lauga E (2007a) Floppy swimming: viscous locomotion of actuated elastica. Phys Rev E 75(041):916MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Lauga E (2007b) Propulsion in a viscoelastic fluid. Phys Fluids 19(083):104Google Scholar
  28. Lauga E (2009) Life at high Deborah number. Europhys Lett 86(64):001Google Scholar
  29. Lauga E, Powers T (2009) The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep Prog Phys 72(096):601MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Leshansky AM (2009) Enhanced low-Reynolds-number propulsion in heterogeneous viscous environments. Phys Rev E 80(051):911Google Scholar
  31. Lighthill J (1975) Mathematical biofluiddynamics. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu B, Powers TR, Breuer KS (2011) Force-free swimming of a model helical flagellum in viscoelastic fluids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19516–19520Google Scholar
  33. Man Y, Lauga E (2013) The wobbling-to-swimming transition of rotated helices. Phys Fluids 25(071):904Google Scholar
  34. Montenegro-Johnson TD, Smith AA, Smith DJ, Loghin D, Blake JR (2012) Modelling the fluid mechanics of cilia and flagella in reproduction and development. Eur Phys J E 35:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Normand T, Lauga E (2008) Flapping motion and force generation in a viscoelastic fluid. Phys Rev E 78(061):907Google Scholar
  36. Pak OS, Normand T, Lauga E (2010) Pumping by flapping in a viscoelastic fluid. Phys Rev E 81(036):312Google Scholar
  37. Pak OS, Zhu L, Brandt L, Lauga E (2012) Micropropulsion and microrheology in complex fluids via symmetry breaking. Phys Fluids 24(103):102Google Scholar
  38. Pozrikidis C (2010) A practical guide to boundary element methods with the software library BEMLIB. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  39. Purcell EM (1977) Life at low Reynolds number. Am J Phys 45:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ross SM, Corrsin S (1974) Results of an analytical model of mucociliary pumping. J Appl Physiol 37:333–340Google Scholar
  41. Shen XN, Arratia PE (2011) Undulatory swimming in viscoelastic fluids. Phys Rev Lett 106(208):101Google Scholar
  42. Sleigh MA, Blake JR, Liron N (1988) The propulsion of mucus by cilia. Am Rev Resp Dis 137:726–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith DJ (2009) A boundary element regularized Stokeslet method applied to cilia-and flagella-driven flow. Proc R Soc Lond A 465(2112):3605–3626CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Spagnolie SE, Liu B, Powers TR (2013) Locomotion of helical bodies in viscoelastic fluids: enhanced swimming at large helical amplitudes. Phys Rev Lett 111(068):101Google Scholar
  45. Suarez SS, Pacey AA (2006) Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. Hum Reprod Update 12:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Teran J, Fauci L, Shelley M (2010) Viscoelastic fluid response can increase the speed and efficiency of a free swimmer. Phys Rev Lett 104(038):101Google Scholar
  47. Vélez-Cordero JR, Lauga E (2013) Waving transport and propulsion in a generalized newtonian fluid. J Non-Newt Fluid Mech 199:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiggins CH, Goldstein RE (1998) Flexive and propulsive dynamics of elastica at low Reynolds number. Phys Rev Lett 80:3879–3882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhu L, Do-Quang M, Lauga E, Brandt L (2011) Locomotion by tangential deformation in a polymeric fluid. Phys Rev E 83(011):901Google Scholar
  50. Zhu L, Lauga E, Brandt L (2012) Self-propulsion in viscoelastic fluids: pushers vs. pullers. Phys Fluids 24(051):902Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de IngenieríaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxicoMexico
  2. 2.Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical PhysicsCentre for Mathematical SciencesCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Instituto de Investigaciones en MaterialesUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxicoMexico

Personalised recommendations