Experiments in Fluids

, 56:71 | Cite as

Convergence enhancement of single-pixel PIV with symmetric double correlation

  • Francesco Avallone
  • Stefano Discetti
  • Tommaso Astarita
  • Gennaro Cardone
Research Article

Abstract

A symmetric correlation approach is proposed to improve the convergence of the single-pixel technique for particle image velocimetry (PIV). Nogueira et al. (Exp Fluids 30:309–316, 2001) introduced this method to remove a source of random errors in PIV when small interrogation windows are used; it consists in applying the cross-correlation operator by considering fixed the first exposure and moving the second one, and vice versa, and then calculating the cross-correlation map as the average of the two maps. The symmetric correlation suppresses the effects of truncation of the particles lying on the border of the interrogation windows. In this paper, the application of symmetric correlation to single-pixel PIV algorithms is reported. Since symmetric direct correlation provides a significant improvement in the cross-correlation peak shape with respect to the standard asymmetric single-pixel implementation, a faster convergence in estimating the average velocity components and turbulence statistics is achieved. An additional improvement is due to the possibly limited correlation between the background noise for the two exposures. The algorithm is tested via synthetic images with imposed constant and sinusoidal displacement and then tested with real data of a jet flow. The technique has shown that the same accuracy of the standard asymmetric approach can be achieved with 50 % of the samples and that a reduction in the measurement error by 30 % is obtained when using the same number of samples.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Gioacchino Cafiero is acknowledged for providing the experimental dataset used in this paper.

References

  1. Adrian RJ (1988) Double exposure, multiple-field Particle Image Velocimetry for turbulent probability density. Opt Laser Eng 9:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrian RJ, Westerweel J (2011) Particle Image Velocimetry. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Astarita T (2006) Analysis of interpolation schemes for image deformation methods in PIV: effect of noise on the accuracy and spatial resolution. Exp Fluids 40:977–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astarita T, Cardone G (2005) Analysis of interpolation schemes for image deformation methods in PIV. Exp Fluids 38:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billy F, David L, Pineau G (2006) Single pixel resolution correlation applied to unsteady flow measurements. Meas Sci Tech 115:1039–1045Google Scholar
  6. Cafiero G, Ceglia G, Discetti S, Ianiro A, Astarita T, Cardone G (2014) On the three-dimensional precessing jet flow past a sudden expansion. Exp Fluids 55:1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceglia G, Discetti S, Ianiro A, Michaelis D, Astarita T, Cardone G (2014) Three-dimensional organization of the flow structure in a non-reactive model aero engine lean burn injection system. Exp Therm Flu Sci 52:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hain R, Kähler CJ (2007) Fundamentals of multiframe particle image velocimetry (PIV). Exp Fluids 42:575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kähler CJ, Scharnowski S, Cierpka C (2012) On the resolution limit of digital particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 52:1629–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meinhart CD, Wereley ST, Santiago GJ (2000) A PIV algorithm for estimating time-averaged velocity fields. J Fluid Eng 122:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nogueira J, Lecuona A, Rodriguez PA (2001) Identification of a new source of peak locking, analysis and its removal in conventional and super-resolution PIV techniques. Exp Fluids 30:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Scharnowski S, Kähler CJ (2013) Methods for estimating higher order moments from PIV data. 10th International symposium on particle image velocimetry. PIV’13 Delft, The Netherlands, July 1–3Google Scholar
  13. Scharnowski S, Hain R, Kähler CJ (2012) Reynolds stress estimation up to single-pixel resolution using PIV-measurements. Exp Fluids 52:985–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scholz U, Kähler CJ (2006) Dynamics of flow structures on heaving and pitching airfoils. 13th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, June 26–29 2006Google Scholar
  15. Sciacchitano A, Scarano F, Wieneke B (2012) Multi-frame pyramid correlation for time-resolved PIV. Exp Fluids 53:1087–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Westerweel J, Scarano F (2005) Universal outlier detection for PIV data. Exp Fluids 39:1096–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Westerweel J, Geelhoed PF, Lindken R (2004) Single-pixel resolution ensemble correlation for micro-PIV applications. Exp Fluids 37:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Avallone
    • 1
  • Stefano Discetti
    • 2
  • Tommaso Astarita
    • 1
  • Gennaro Cardone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering (DII)Universitá degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.Aerospace Engineering GroupUniversidad Carlos III de MadridLeganésSpain

Personalised recommendations