Experiments in Fluids

, 55:1661 | Cite as

Comparison of unsteady pressure fields on turrets with different surface features using pressure-sensitive paint

  • Stanislav Gordeyev
  • Nicholas De Lucca
  • Eric J. Jumper
  • Kyle Hird
  • Thomas J. Juliano
  • James W. Gregory
  • James Thordahl
  • Donald J. WittichIII
Research Article

Abstract

Spatially temporally resolved unsteady pressure fields on a surface of a hemisphere-on-cylinder turret with either a flat or a conformal window with realistic features such as gaps and “smile” cutouts were characterized using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint at M = 0.33 for several window viewing angles. Various statistical properties of pressure fields were computed, and geometry effects on the unsteady pressure fields were analyzed and discussed. Proper orthogonal decomposition was also used to extract dominant pressure modes and corresponding temporal coefficients and to analyze and compare instantaneous pressure structures for different turret geometric features and the window viewing angles. An unsteady separation off the turret and a recirculation region downstream of the turret were identified as dominant sources of the unsteady pressure. It was found that while all geometric features affected the unsteady pressure field, the “smiles,” positioned spanwise-symmetrically on both sides of the turret, were the leading cause of these changes, followed by the looking forward flat window. The gaps, the side- and the back-looking flat window introduced only small local changes.

References

  1. Adrian RJ (1977) On the role of conditional averages in turbulence theory. In: Zakin J, Patterson G (eds) Proceedings of the fourth biennial symposium on turbulence in liquids. Science Press, Princeton, pp 323–332Google Scholar
  2. Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley J (1993) The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25(1):539–575CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonnet JP, Cole DR, Delville J, Glauser MN, Ukeiley LS (1994) Stochastic estimation and proper orthogonal decomposition: complementary techniques for identifying structure. Exp Fluids 17:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burns R, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ, Gogineni S, Paul M, Wittich DJ (2014) Estimation of aero-optical wavefronts using optical and non-optical measurements. AIAA paper 2014-0319Google Scholar
  5. Carlbom I, Paciorek J (1978) Planar geometric projections and viewing transformations. ACM Comput Surv 10(4):465–502CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen K, Siegel S, Wetlesen D, Camero J, Sick A (2004) Effective sensor placements for the estimation of proper orthogonal decomposition mode coefficients in von Karman vortex street. J Vib Control 10(12):1857–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Lucca N, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ (2012) The study of aero-optical and mechanical jitter for flat window turrets. AIAA paper 2012-0623Google Scholar
  8. De Lucca N, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ (2013a) In-flight aero-optics of turrets. J Opt Eng 52(7):071405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Lucca N, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ, Hird K, Juliano TJ, Gregory JW, Thordahl J, Wittich DJ (2013b) The estimation of the unsteady force applied to a turret in flight. AIAA paper 2013-3136Google Scholar
  10. Everson RM, Sirovich L (1995) The Karhunen–Loeve transform for incomplete data. J Opt Soc Am A 12(8):1657–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang S, Disotell KJ, Long SR, Gregory JW, Semmelmayer FC, Guyton RW (2011) Application of fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint to a hemispherical dome in unsteady transonic flow. Exp Fluids 50(6):1495–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fang S, Long SR, Disotell KJ, Gregory JW, Semmelmayer FC, Guyton RW (2012) Comparison of unsteady pressure-sensitive paint measurement techniques. AIAA J 50(1):109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ (2010) Fluid dynamics and aero-optics of turrets. Prog Aerosp Sci 46:388–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gordeyev S, Post M, MacLaughlin T, Ceniceros J, Jumper EJ (2007) Aero-optical environment around a conformal-window turret. AIAA J 45(7):1514–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordeyev S, Cress J, Smith A, Jumper EJ (2010) Improvement in optical environment over turrets with flat window using passive flow control. AIAA paper 2010-4492Google Scholar
  16. Gordeyev S, Burns R, Jumper EJ, Gogineni S, Paul M, Wittich DJ (2013) Aero-optical mitigation of shocks around turrets at transonic speeds using passive flow control. AIAA paper 2013-0717Google Scholar
  17. Gregory JW, Asai K, Kameda M, Liu T, Sullivan JP (2008) A review of pressure-sensitive paint for high-speed and unsteady aerodynamics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 222(2):249–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gregory JW, Sakaue H, Liu T, Sullivan JP (2014) Fast pressure-sensitive paints for flow and acoustic diagnostics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 46:303–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haralick RM (1980) Using perspective transformations in scene analysis. Comput Graph Image Process 13:191–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hird K, Juliano TJ, Gregory JW, De Lucca N, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ, Thordahl J, Wittich DJ (2013) Study of unsteady surface pressure on a turret via pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA paper 2013-3135Google Scholar
  21. Jelic R, Sherer S, Greendyke R (2013) Simulation of various turrets at subsonic and transonic flight conditions using overflow. J Aircr 50:398–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jumper EJ, Zenk M, Gordeyev S, Cavalieri D, Whiteley MR (2013) Airborne aero-optics laboratory. J Opt Eng 52(7):071408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu T, Sullivan JP (2005) Pressure and temperature sensitive paints. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan PE, Visbal MR (2012a) Numerical simulation of flow over a submerged hemispherical flat-window turret. AIAA paper 2012-3042Google Scholar
  25. Morgan PE, Visbal MR (2012b) Hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes/Large–Eddy simulation investigating control of flow over a turret. J Aircr 49(6):1700–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morgan PE, White MD, Visbal MR (2011) Simulation of aero-optics for flow over a flat-window hemispherical turret. AIAA paper 2011-3264Google Scholar
  27. Porter C, Gordeyev S, Zenk M, Jumper EJ (2013) Flight measurements of the aero-optical environment around a flat-windowed turret. AIAA J 51(6):1394–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tan TN, Sullivan GD, Baker KD (1993) On computing the perspective transformation matrix and camera parameters. In: Proceedings of the 4th British machine vision conference, Surrey, England, pp 125–134Google Scholar
  29. Vukasinovic B, Glezer A, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ (2013) Flow control for aero-optics application. Exp Fluids 54:1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanislav Gordeyev
    • 1
  • Nicholas De Lucca
    • 1
  • Eric J. Jumper
    • 1
  • Kyle Hird
    • 2
  • Thomas J. Juliano
    • 2
  • James W. Gregory
    • 2
  • James Thordahl
    • 3
  • Donald J. WittichIII
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Air Force Research LaboratoryDirected Energy DirectorateKirtland AFBUSA

Personalised recommendations