Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 54:1427 | Cite as

Generation of polygonal gas interfaces by soap film for Richtmyer–Meshkov instability study

  • Minghu Wang
  • Ting Si
  • Xisheng LuoEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

A simple method of generating polygonal gas interfaces is proposed by using the soap film technique. Thin pins are used as angular vertexes to connect the adjacent sides of polygonal soap films in order to avoid the pressure singularities around the vertexes caused by the surface tension. As a demonstration, three polygonal interfaces (i.e., square, equilateral triangle and diamond) are created in the test section of a shock tube. Experiments are then carried out for a planar shock wave (Mach number about 1.2) interacting with air/SF6 polygonal interfaces. Numerical simulations are also performed to validate the proposed method of the interface formation. Wave systems and interface structures can be clearly identified in experimental schlieren images and agree well with the numerical results. It is also indicated that the presences of thin pins and fine chamfers only have limited effects on the interface evolution and can be ignored at the very early stage. Experimental and numerical results about the movement of the distorted interface, the width and height of the interface structures are further compared and good agreement is achieved. It is then concluded that the polygonal interface formed by the proposed method is applicable for the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability study.

Keywords

Shock Tube Schlieren Image Interface Formation Soap Film Planar Shock Wave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 10972214 and 11272308).

References

  1. Arnett WD, Bahcall JN, Kirshner RP, Woosley SE (1989) Supernova 1987A. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 27:629–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balasubramanian S, Orlicz GC, Prestridge KP, Balakumar BJ (2012) Experimental study of initial condition dependence on Richtmyer-Meshkov instability in the presence of reshock. Phys Fluids 24:034103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates KR, Nikiforakisb N (2007) Richtmyer-Meshkov instability induced by the interaction of a shock wave with a rectangular block of SF6. Phys Fluids 19:036101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haas JF, Sturtevan B (1987) Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneities. J Fluid Mech 181:41–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haehn N, Ranjan D, Weber C, Oakley J, Rothamer D, Bonazza R (2012) Reacting shock bubble interaction. Combust Flame 159:1339–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hosseini SHR, Takayama K (2005) Experimental study of Richtmyer-Meshkov instability induced by cylindrical shock waves. Phys Fluids 17:084101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Isenberg C (1992) The science of soap films and soap bubbles. Dover publications, INC. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs JW, Klein DL, Jenkins DG, Benjamin RF (1992) Instability growth patterns of a shock-accelerated thin fluid layer. Phys Rev Lett 70(5):583–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs JW (1993) The dynamics of shock accelerated light and heavy gas cylinders. Phys Fluids 5(9):2239–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacobs JW, Sheeley JM (1995) Experimental study of incompressible Richtmyer-Meshkov instability. Phys Fluids 8(2):405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs JW, Krivets VV (2005) Experiments on the late-time development of single-mode Richtmyer-Meshkov instability. Phys Fluids 17:034105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones MA, Jacobs JW (1997) A membraneless experiment for the study of Richtmyer-Meshkov instability of a shock-accelerated gas interface. Phys. Fluids 9(10):3078–3085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Layes G, Jourdan G, Houas L (2009) Experimental study on a plane shock wave accelerating a gas bubble. Phys Fluids 21:074102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindl JD, Mccrory RL, Campbell EM (1992) Progress toward ignition and burn propagation in inertial confinement fusion. Phys Today 45:32-40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Long CC, Krivets VV, Greenough JA, Jacobs JW (2009) Shock tube experiments and numerical simulation of the single-mode, three-dimensional Richtmyer-Meshkov instability. Phys Fluids 21:114104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luo X, Lamanna G, Holten APC, van Dongen MEH (2007) Effects of homogeneous condensation in compressible flows: Ludwieg-tube experiments and simulations. J Fluid Mech 572:339-366zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mariani C, Vanderboomgaerde M, Jourdan G, Souffland D, Houas L (2008) Investigation of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability with stereolithographed interfaces. Phys Rev Lett 100:254503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mikaelian KO (2005) Richtmyer-Meshkov instability of arbitrary shapes. Phys Fluids 17:034101MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meshkov EE (1969) Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave. Fluid Dyn 4:101–104MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Orlicz GC, Balakumar BJ, Tomkins CD, Prestridge KP (2009) A Mach number study of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability in a varicose, heavy-gas curtain. Phys Fluids 21:064102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Puranik PB, Oakley JG, Anderson MH, Bonazza R (2004) Experimental study of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability induced by a Mach 3 shock wave. Shock Waves 13:413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richtmyer RD (1960) Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Commun Pure Appl Math 13:297–319MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ranjan D, Anderson M, Oakley J, Bonazza R (2005) Experimental investigation of a strongly shocked gas bubble. Phys Rev Lett 94:184507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ranjan D, Oakley J, Bonazza R (2011) Shock-bubble interactions. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43:117–140MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Si T, Zhai Z, Luo X, Yang J (2012) Experimental studies of reshocked spherical gas interfaces. Phys Fluids 24:054101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun M (1998) Numerical and experimental studies of shock wave interation with bodies. PhD thesis, Tohoku UniversityGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun M, Takayama K (1999) Conservative smoothing on an adaptive quadrilateral grid. J Comput Phys 150:143–180zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tomkins C, Kumar S, Orlicz GC, Prestridge KP (2008) An experimental investigation of mixing mechanisms in shock-accelerated flow. J Fluid Mech 611:131–150zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang J, Kubota T, Zukoski EE (1993) Applications of shock-induced mixing to supersonic combustion. AIAA J 35:854–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zou L, Liu C, Tan D, Huang W, Luo X (2010) On interaction of shock wave with elliptic gas cylinder. J Vis 13:347–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhai Z, Si T, Luo X, Yang J (2011) On the evolution of spherical gas interfaces accelerated by a planar shock wave. Phys Fluids 23:084104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Modern MechanicsUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations