Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp 1545–1560 | Cite as

Pulsed, high-power LED illumination for tomographic particle image velocimetry

  • Nicolas A. BuchmannEmail author
  • Christian E. Willert
  • Julio Soria
Research Article


This paper investigates the use of high-power light-emitting diode (LED) illumination for tomographic particle image velocimetry (PIV) as an alternative to traditional laser-based illumination. Modern solid-state LED devices can provide averaged radiant power in excess of 10 W and by operating the LED with short high current pulses theoretical pulse energies up to several tens of mJ can be achieved. In the present work, a custom-built drive circuit is used to drive a Luminus PT-120 high-power LED at pulsed currents of up to 150 A and 1 μs duration. Volumetric illumination is achieved by directly projecting the LED into the flow to produce a measurement volume of ≈3–4 times the size of the LED die. The feasibility of the volumetric LED illumination is assessed by performing tomographic PIV of homogenous, grid-generated turbulence. Two types of LEDs are investigated, and the results are compared with measurements of the same flow using pulsed Nd:YAG laser illumination and DNS data of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. The quality of the results is similar for both investigated LEDs with no significant difference between the LED and Nd:YAG illumination. Compared with the DNS, some differences are observed in the power spectra and the probability distributions of the fluctuating velocity and velocity gradients. These differences are attributed to the limited spatial resolution of the experiments and noise introduced during the tomographic reconstruction (i.e. ghost particles). The uncertainty in the velocity measurements associated with the LED illumination is estimated to approximately 0.2–0.3 pixel for both LEDs, which compares favourably with similar tomographic PIV measurements of turbulent flows. In conclusion, the proposed high-power, pulsed LED volume illumination provides accurate and reliable tomographic PIV measurements in water and presents a promising technique for flow diagnostics and velocimetry.


Particle Image Velocimetry Drive Current Green Lead Ghost Particle Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Project funding scheme (DP1096474).


  1. Adrian RJ, Westerweel J (2010) Particle image velocimetry. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Agui J, Jimenes J (1987) On the performance of particle tracking. J Fluid Mech 185:447–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson C, Coudert S, Foucaut J-M, Stanislas M, Soria J (2011) The accuracy of tomographic particle image velocimetry for measurements of a turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 50:1031–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson C, Soria J (2009) An efficient simultaneous reconstruction technique for tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 47:553–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broeder D, Sommerfeld M (2007) Planar shadow image velocimetry for the analysis of the hydrodynamics in bubbly flows. Meas Sci Technol 8:2513–2528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchmann NA, Atkinson C, Jermy MC, Soria J (2011a) Tomographic particle image velocimetry investigation of the flow in a modeled human carotid artery bifurcation. Exp Fluids 50:1131–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchmann NA, Atkinson C, Soria J (2010a) Tomographic and stereoscopic PIV measurements of gridgenerated homogeneous turbulence. In: 15th International symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchmann NA, Mitchell D, Ingvorsen KM, Honnery D, Soria J (2011b) High spatial resolution imaging of a supersonic underexpanded jet impinging on a flat plate. In: Sixth australian conference on laser diagnostics in fluid mechanics and combustion, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchmann NA, Willert C, Soria J (2010b) Pulsed, high-power LED volume illumination for tomographic particle image velocimetry. In: 17th australasian fluid mechanics conference, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  10. Chetelat O, Kim KC (2002) Miniature particle image velocimetry system with LED in-line illumination. Meas Sci Technol 13:1006–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elsinga GE, Scarano F, Wieneke B, van Oudheusden BW (2006) Tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 41:933–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elsinga GE, Westerweel J, Scarano F, Novara M (2011) On the velocity of ghost particles and the bias errors in Tomographic-PIV. Exp Fluids 50:825–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Estevadeordal J, Goss L (2005) PIV with LED: Particle shadow velocimetry (PSV). In: 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, pp 12355–12364Google Scholar
  14. Foucaut JM, Carlier J, Stanislas M (2004) PIV optimization for the study of turbulent flow using spectral analysis. Meas Sci Technol 15:1046–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ganapathisubramani B, Lakshminarasimhan K, Clemens NT (2007) Determination of complete velocity gradient tensor by using cinematographic stereoscopic PIV in a turbulent jet. Exp Fluids 42:923–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hagsaeter SM, Westergaard CH, Bruus H, Kutter JP (2008) Investigations on LED illumination for micro-PIV including a novel front-lit configuration. Exp Fluids 44:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hargather MJ, Lawson MJ, Settle GS, Weinstein LM, Gogineni S (2002) Focusing-Schlieren PIV measurements of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. In: 47th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Florida, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  18. Jimenez J (1998) Turbulent velocity fluctuations need not be gaussian. J Fluid Mech 376:139–147MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klinner J, Willert C (2012) Tomographic shadowgraphy for three-dimensional reconstruction of instantaneous spray distributions. Exp Fluids doi: 10.1007/s00348-012-1308-2
  20. Kühn M, Ehrenfried K, Bosbach J, Wagner C (2011) Large-scale tomographic particle image velocimetry using helium-filled soap bubbles. Exp Fluids 50:929–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kühn M, Ehrenfried K, Bosbach J, Wagner C (2012) Large-scale tomographic PIV in forced and mixed convection using a parallel SMART version. Exp Fluids doi: 10.1007/s00348-012-1301-9
  22. Li Y, Perlman E, Wan M, Yang Y, Burns R, Meneveau C, Burns R, Chen S, Szalay A, Eyink G (2008) A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence. J. Turbulence 9(31)Google Scholar
  23. Lindken R, Merzkirch W (2002) A novel PIV technique for measurements in multiphase flows and its application to two-phase bubbly flows. Exp Fluids 33:814–825Google Scholar
  24. Luminus (2009) Product Data Sheet, PhlatLight PT120 Projection Chipset. Luminus Devices IncGoogle Scholar
  25. Scarano F, Elsinga GE, Bocci E, van Oudheusden BW (2006) Investigation of 3-D coherent structures in the turbulent cylinder wake using tomo-PIV. In: 13th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  26. Soloff SM, Adrian RJ, Liu ZC (1997) Distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8:1441–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soria J (1996) An investigation of the near wake of a circular cylinder using a video-based digital cross-correlation particle image velocimetry technique. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 12:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wieneke B (2008) Volume self-calibration for 3D particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 45:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wieneke B, Taylor S (2006) Fat-sheet PIV with computation of full 3D-strain tensor using tomographic reconstruction. In: 13th International symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  30. Willert C, Moessner S, Klinner J (2009) Pulsed operation of high power light emitting diodes for flow velocimetry. In: 8th international symposium on particle image velocimetry, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  31. Willert C, Stasicki B, Klinner J, Moessner S (2010) Pulsed operation of high-power light emitting diodes for imaging flow velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 21:075402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Willert CE, Mitchell DM, Soria J (2012) An assessment of high-power light-emitting diodes for high frame rate schlieren imaging. Exp Fluids doi: 10.1007/s00348-012-1297-1
  33. Worth N, Nickels T (2008) Acceleration of Tomo-PIV by estimating the initial volume intensity distribution. Exp Fluids 45:847–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Worth NA, Nickels TB, Swaminathan N (2010) A tomographic PIV resolution study based on homogeneous isotropic turbulence dns data. Exp Fluids 49:637–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas A. Buchmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christian E. Willert
    • 3
  • Julio Soria
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory for Turbulence Research in Aerospace and Combustion, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringMonash UniversityVictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Aeronautical EngineeringKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.German Aerospace Center (DLR)Institute of Propulsion Technology, Engine Measurement SystemsKoelnGermany

Personalised recommendations