Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 52, Issue 5, pp 1237–1260 | Cite as

Polymer-induced turbulence modifications in an impinging jet

Research Article


This effort explores the impact of dilute polymer solutions on the turbulence characteristics in a submerged liquid impinging-jet configuration. Turbulent impinging jets are commonly used in technological applications such as drying, scouring, cooling, or heating due to an enhancement in transport characteristics in the impingement region under certain nozzle-to-wall configurations. Previous efforts have identified significant turbulence modifications in the presence of dilute concentrations of polymer in both bounded and unbounded flows, though the former has received considerably more attention. To this end, particle-image velocimetry measurements were taken for an axisymmetric turbulent impinging jet with a nozzle-to-wall distance H/D = 6.8 and nominal Reynolds number of 26,000. Measurements were performed for both plain water and dilute polymer solutions of polyethylene oxide at concentrations of 50 and 100 ppm. The mean and turbulence characteristics of these three flows are contrasted and it is observed that the two polymer solutions modify both the mean and turbulent characteristics of the jet in all three regions of interest (the free-jet, impingement, and wall-jet regions). Of interest, the 50 ppm case yielded a slight suppression of the turbulence in the free-jet region accompanied by a longer axial length of the potential core compared to the case of plain water. In contrast, the 100 ppm case exhibits clear enhancement of the turbulence in the free-jet region and a shortening of the potential core length. The effect of polymer was opposite in the impingement and wall-jet regions wherein the turbulence was slightly suppressed in the 100 ppm case in a manner consistent with the onset of the Toms effect in this wall-bounded region of the flow.



This work was supported by the University of Illinois. Pipe flow friction-factor measurements were taken in the Microfluidics and Ejecta Transport Laboratory of the Dynamic Materials Team at Los Alamos National Laboratory under the supervision of Dr. B.J. Balakumar. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Prof. Randy Ewoldt at the University of Illinois in attempting the CaBER measurements for the polymer solutions studied herein.


  1. Adrian RJ, Christensen KT, Liu ZC (2000) Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp Fluids 29:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angioletti M, Di Tommaso RM, Nino E, Ruocco G (2003) Simultaneous visualization of flow field and evaluation of local heat transfer by transitional impinging jets. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:1703–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker SJ (1973) Laser-Doppler measurements on a round turbulent jet in dilute polymer solutions. J Fluid Mech 60(4):721–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baughn JW, Shimizu S (1989) Heat transfer measurements from a surface with uniform heat flux and an impinging jet. ASME J Heat Transf 111:1096–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman NS, Tan H (1985) Two-component laser Doppler velocimeter studies of submerged jets of dilute polymer solutions. AIChE J 31(2):208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Browand FK, Laufer J (1977) The role of large scale structures in the initial development of circular jets. In: Turbulence in liquids; proceedings of the 4th biennial symposium on turbulence in liquids, Science Press, Princeton–New Jersey, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri–Rolla, pp 333–344Google Scholar
  7. Chatterjee A, Dhingra SC, Kapur SS (2002) Laminar impinging jet heat transfer with a purely viscous inelastic fluid. Num Heat Transf 42:193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clisby N (2010) Accurate estimation of the critical exponent ν for self-avoiding walks via a fast implementation of the pivot algorithm. Phys Rev Lett 104:055,702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper D, Jackson D, Launder BE, Liao GX (1993) Impinging jet studies for turbulence model assessment—I. Flow-field experiments. Int J Heat Mass Transf 36(10):2675–2684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubief Y, White CM, Terrapon VE, Shaqfeh ESG, Moin P, Lele SK (2004) On the coherent drag-reducing and turbulence-enhancing behaviour of polymers in wall flows. J Fluid Mech 514:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fairweather M, Hargrave GK (2002) Experimental investigation of an axisymmetric, impinging turbulent jet. 1. Velocity field. Exp Fluids 33:464–471Google Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald JA, Garimella SV (1998) A study of the flow field of a confined and submerged impinging jet. Int J Heat Mass Transf 41(8–9):1025–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flory P (1971) Principles of polymer chemistry. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  14. Gardon R, Akfirat JC (1965) The role of turbulence in determining the heat-transfer characteristics of impinging jets. Int J Heat Mass Transf 8:1261–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gardon R, Cobonpue J (1962) Heat transfer between a flat plate and jets of air impinging on it. Int Dev Heat Transf, Proceedings of the International Heat Transfer Conference, ASME–New York, pp 454–460Google Scholar
  16. Glowacki P (1989) Turbulence characteristics of impinging jets near the deflecting surface. The effect of polymer additives. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 33:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldstein RJ, Franchett ME (1988) Heat transfer from a flat surface to an oblique impinging jet. J Heat Transf 110:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guillard F, Fritzon R, Revstedt J, Trãgårdh C, Alden M, Fuchs L (1998) Mixing in a confined turbulent impinging jet using planar laser-induced fluorescence. Exp Fluids 25:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoyt JW, Taylor JJ (1979) Effect of nozzle shape and polymer additives on water jet appearance. ASME J Fluids Engng 101:304–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoyt JW, Taylor JJ, Runge CD (1974) The structure of jets of water and polymer solution in air. J Fluid Mech 63(4):635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hussain AKMF, Ramjee V (1976) Effects of the axisymmetric contraction shape on incompressible turbulent flow. ASME J Fluids Engng 98:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jambunathan K, Lai E, Moss MA, Button BL (1992) A review of heat transfer data for single circular jet impingement. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 13(2):106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kezios SP (1956) Heat transfer in the flow of a cylindrical air jet normal to an infinite plane. PhD thesis, Illinois Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  24. Khalashnikov VN (1994) Shear-rate dependent viscosity of dilute polymer solutions. J Rheol 38(5):1385–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koziol K, Glowacki P (1989) Turbulent jets of dilute polymer solutions. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 32:311–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landreth CC, Adrian RJ (1990) Impingement of a low Reynolds number turbulent circular jet onto a flat plate at normal incidence. Exp Fluids 9:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lumley JL (1969) Drag reduction by additives. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1:367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maurel S, Solliec C (2001) A turbulent plane jet impinging nearby and far from a flat plate. Exp Fluids 31:687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muller AJ, Saez AE, Odell JA (1995) Turbulence suppresion by polymer solutions in opposed jet flows. AIChE J 41(5):1333–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Popiel CO, Boguslawski L (1988) Effect of flow structure on the heat and mass transfer on a flat plate in an impinging round jet. In: 2nd UK National Conferences on Heat Transfer, pp 663–685Google Scholar
  31. Prasad AK, Adrian RJ, Landreth CC, Offutt PW (1992) Effect of resolution on the speed and accuracy of particle image velocimetry interrogation. Exp Fluids 13:105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reiner M (1964) The Deborah number. Phys Today 17:62Google Scholar
  33. Roberts DM (1979) Descriptive and inferential statistical topics, 2nd edn. Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co., DubuqueGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodd LE, Scott TP, Cooper-White JJ, McKinley GH (2005) Capillary break-up rheometry of low-viscosity elastic fluids. Appl Rheol 15(1):12–27Google Scholar
  35. Rohaly J, Frigerio F, Hart DP (2002) Reverse hierarchical PIV processing. Meas Sci Tech 13:984–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sakakibara J, Hishida K, Maeda M (1996) Vortex structure and heat transfer in the stagnation region of an impinging plane jet. Int J Heat Mass Transf 40(13):3163–3176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlunder EU, Gnielinski V (1967) Heat and mass transfer between surface and impinging jets. Chem Engng Tech 39:578–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Terrapon VE, Dubief Y, Moin P, Shaqfeh ESG, Lele SK (2004) Simulated polymer stretch in a turbulent flow using Brownian dynamics. J Fluid Mech 504:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tirtaatmadja V, McKinley GH, Cooper-White JJ (2006) Drop formation and breakup of low viscosity elastic fluids: effects of molecular weight and concentration. Phys Fluids 18:043,101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Toms BA (1949) Some observations on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers. In: Proc. 1st Intl. Cong. Rheol. Vol. II, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri–Rolla, p 135Google Scholar
  41. Usui H, Sano Y (1980) Turbulence structure of submerged jets of dilute polymer solutions. J Chem Eng Jpn 13:401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Virk PS (1975) Drag reduction fundamentals. AIChE J 21(4):625–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vlasov SA, Kalashnikov VN, Mulchenko BF, Rinkevichyus BS, Smirnov VI (1973) The long-range nature of turbulent submerged jets of polymer solutions. Fluid Mech–Soviet Res 2(1):108–111Google Scholar
  44. Walker JDA, Smith CR, Cerra AW, Doligalski TL (1987) The impact of a vortex ring on a wall. J Fluids Mech 181:99–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Warholic MD, Massah H, Hanratty TJ (1999) Influence of drag-reducing polymers on turbulence: effects of Reynolds number, concentration and mixing. Exp Fluids 27:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Westerweel J (1997) Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Tech 8:1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu Y, Christensen KT (2006) Population trends of spanwise vortices in wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech 568:55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zagarola MV, Smits AJ (1998) Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 373:33–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations