The flow structure on a rotating plate of low aspect ratio is characterized well after the onset of motion, such that transient effects are not significant, and only centripetal and Coriolis accelerations are present. Patterns of vorticity, velocity contours, and streamline topology are determined via quantitative imaging, in order to characterize the leading-edge vortex in relation to the overall flow structure. A stable leading-edge vortex is maintained over effective angles of attack from 30° to 75°, and at each angle of attack, its sectional structure at midspan is relatively insensitive to Reynolds number over the range from 3,600 to 14,500. The streamline topology, vorticity distribution, and circulation of the leading-edge vortex are determined as a function of angle of attack, and related to the velocity field oriented toward, and extending along, the leeward surface of the plate. The structure of the leading-edge vortex is classified into basic regimes along the span of the plate. Images of these regimes are complemented by patterns on crossflow planes, which indicate the influence of root and tip swirl, and spanwise flow along the leeward surface of the plate. Comparison with the equivalent of the purely translating plate, which does not induce the foregoing flow structure, further clarifies the effects of rotation.
Vorticity Particle Image Velocimetry Leeward Side Effective Angle Spanwise Velocity
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This investigation was supported by a grant from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, monitored by Dr. Douglas Smith.
Aono H, Liang F, Liu H (2008) Near- and far-field aerodynamics in insect hovering flight: an integrated computational study. J Exp Biol 211:239–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch JM, Dickinson MH (2001) Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings. Nature 412:729–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch JM, Dickinson MH (2003) The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight. J Exp Biol 206:2257–2272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch JM, Dickson WB, Dickinson MH (2004) Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers. J Exp Biol 207:1063–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomphrey RJ, Lawson NJ, Taylor GK, Thomas ALR (2006) Application of digital particle image velocimetry to insect aerodynamics: measurement of the leading-edge vortex and near wake of a Hawkmoth. Exp Fluids 40:546–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVoria A, Mahajan P, Ringuette MJ (2011) Vortex formation and saturation for low-aspect-ratio rotating flat plates at low Reynolds number. In: 49th AIAA aero sci meeting Orlando, FloridaGoogle Scholar
Dickinson MH, Lehmann FO, Sane SP (1999) Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284:1954–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge JD, Wang CJ, Ol M (2009) A computational study of a canonical pitch-up, pitch-down wing maneuver. AIAA, 3687Google Scholar
Ellington CP (1984) The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight, I–II–III–IV–V–VI. Philos Trans R Soc B 305:1–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellington CP, van den Berg C, Willmott AP, Thomas ALR (1996) Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 384:626–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones AR, Babinsky H (2011) Reynolds number effects on leading edge vortex development on a waving wing. Exp Fluids Issn 0723–4864:1–14Google Scholar
Kim D, Gharib M (2010) Experimental study of three-dimensional vortex structures in translating and rotating plates. Exp Fluids 49:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kweon J, Choi H (2010) Sectional lift coefficient of a flapping wing in hovering motion. Phys Fluids 22:071703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann FO (2004) The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight. Naturwissenschaften 91:101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentink D, Dickinson MH (2009a) Biofluiddynamic scaling of flapping, spinning and translating fins and wings. J Exp Biol 212:2691–2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentink D, Dickinson MH (2009b) Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings. J Exp Biol 212:2705–2719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu H, Ellington CP, Kawachi K, van den Berg C, Willmott AP (1998) A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering. J Exp Biol 201:461–477Google Scholar
Lu Y, Shen GX (2008) Three-dimensional flow structures and evolution of the leading-edge vortices on a flapping wing. J Exp Biol 211:1221–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo G, Sun M (2005) The effects of corrugation and wing planform on the aerodynamic force production of sweeping model insect wings. Acta Mech Sinica 21:531–541CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Poelma C, Dickson WB, Dickinson MH (2006) Time-resolved reconstruction of the full velocity field around a dynamically-scaled flapping wing. Exp Fluids 41:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shyy W, Aono H, Chimakurthi SK, Trizila P, Kang CK, Cesnik CES, Liu H (2010) Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog Aerosp Sci 46:284–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun M, Tang J (2002) Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J Exp Biol 205:55–70Google Scholar
Thomas ALR, Taylor GK, Srygley RB, Nudds RL, Bomphrey RJ (2004) Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack. J Exp Biol 207:4299–4323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usherwod JR, Ellington CP (2002) The aerodynamics of revolving wings, I–II. J Exp Biol 205:1547–1576Google Scholar
van den Berg C, Ellington CP (1997) The three-dimensional leading-edge vortex of a ‘hovering’ model hawkmoth. Philos Trans R Soc B 352:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar