Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 647–661 | Cite as

Residence time measurement of an isothermal combustor flow field

  • Liangta Cheng
  • Adrian SpencerEmail author
Research Article


Residence times of combustors have commonly been used to help understand NOx emissions and flame blowout. Both the time mean velocity and turbulence fields are important to the residence time, but determining the residence time via analysis of a measured velocity field is difficult due to the inherent unsteadiness and the three-dimensional nature of a high-Re swirling flow. A more direct approach to measure residence time is reported here that examines the dynamic response of fuel concentration to a sudden cutoff in the fuel injection. Residence time measurement was mainly taken using a time-resolved planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) technique, but a second camera for particle image velocimetry (PIV) was added to check that the step change does not alter the velocity field and the spectral content of the coherent structures. Characteristic timescales evaluated from the measurements are referred to as convection and half-life times: The former describes the time delay from a fuel injector exit reference point to a downstream point of interest, and the latter describes the rate of decay once the effect of the reduced scalar concentration at the injection source has been transported to the point of interest. Residence time is often defined as the time taken for a conserved scalar to reduce to half its initial value after injection is stopped: this equivalent to the sum of the convection time and the half-life values. The technique was applied to a high-swirl fuel injector typical of that found in combustor applications. Two test cases have been studied: with central jet (with-jet) and without central jet (no-jet). It was found that the relatively unstable central recirculation zone of the no-jet case resulted in increased transport of fuel into the central region that is dominated by a precessing vortex core, where long half-life times are also found. Based on this, it was inferred that the no-jet case may be more prone to NOx production. The technique is described here for a single-phase isothermal flow field, but with consideration, it could be extended to studying reacting flows to provide more insight into important mixing phenomena and relevant timescales.


Particle Image Velocimetry Shear Layer Fuel Injector Vortex Pair Residence Time Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

348_2011_1085_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (351 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 350 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 20982 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (AVI 53011 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (AVI 57814 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (AVI 34100 kb)


  1. Adrian RJ (1991) Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 23:261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arai M, Nomura T, Hiroyasu H (1998) Residence time measurement in a swirl type combustor with helium tracer. Jap Soc Mech Eng 86(1302A):2619–2625Google Scholar
  3. Cheng L, Dianat M, Spencer A, McGuirk JJ (2010) SPIV/PLIF validation of LES predictions of scalar mixing in high-swirl fuel injector flows. In: ETMM8: 8th Int. ERCOFTAC Symp. Marseille, France. (Invited to Jnl Flow Turb. And Comb.)Google Scholar
  4. Chigier NA, Beer JM (1972) Combustion aerodynamics. Applied Science, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Nardo A, Calchetti G, Mongiello C, Giammartini S, Rufoloni M (2009) CFD Modelling of an experimental scaled model of a trapped vortex combustor. In: Proceedings of the European combustion meetingGoogle Scholar
  6. Driscoll J, Chen RH, Yoon Y (1992) Nitric oxide levels of turbulent jet diffusion flames: effects of residence time and Damkohler number. Comb Flame 88:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunham D, Spencer A, McGuirk JJ, Dianat M (2009) Comparison of unsteady reynolds averaged navier–stokes and large eddy simulation computational fluid dynamics methodologies for air swirl fuel injectors. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 131:011502. doi: 10.1115/1.2969096 Google Scholar
  8. Giordano D, Giammartini S, Manfredi F, Guj G (2001) Non dimensional numbers dependency on a Dry Low NOx Annular Burner Analysed with PIV technique. In: 9th National Conference AIVELA, Ancona, 2001Google Scholar
  9. Heywood JB, Fay JA, Lindern LH (1970) Jet aircraft air pollutant production and dispersion. AIAA 70-115Google Scholar
  10. Huang Y, Yang V (2005) Effect of swirl on combustion dynamics in a lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustor. Proc Comb Inst 30:1775–1782Google Scholar
  11. Janus B, Dreizler A, Janicka J (2007) Experiments on swirl stabilized non-premixed natural gas flames in a model gasturbine combustor. Proc Comb Inst 31:3091–3098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lieuwen T (2006) The gas turbine handbook. Department of Energy, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Meier W, Weigand P, Duan XR, Giezendanner-Thoben R (2007) Detailed characterization of the dynamics of thermoacoustic pulsations in a lean premixed swirl flame. Comb Flame 150Google Scholar
  14. Midgley KK (2005) An isothermal experimental study of the unsteady fluid mechanics of gas turbine fuel injector flowfields. Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Midgley K, Spencer A (2005) Unsteady flow structures in radial swirler fed fuel injectors. ASME J Eng Gas Turbine Power 127:755–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Noble D, Zhang Q, Shareef A, Tootle J, Meyers A, Lieuwen T (2006) Syngas mixture composition effects upon flashback and blowout. ASME 2006-90470Google Scholar
  17. Ozdemir IB, Peters N (2001) Characteristics of the reaction zone in a combustor operating at mild combustion. Exp Fluids 30:683–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pantano C, Sarkar S, Williams FA (2003) Mixing of a conserved scalar in a turbulent reacting shear layer. J Fluid Mech 481:291–328zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Read R, Hochgreb S (2010) Isothermal flow measurements in a gas turbine combustor using a fast flame ionization detector. Meas Sci Technol 21:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roffe GK, Venkataramani KS (1978) Emissions measurements for lean premixed propane/air systems at pressures up to 30 atmospheres. NASA CR-159421Google Scholar
  21. Spencer A (1998) Gas turbine combustor port flows. Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Spencer A, Cheng L (2010) Combustor residence time measurement using planar laser induced fluorescence. In: Proc ASME Turbo Expo GT2010-22573Google Scholar
  23. Spencer A, McGuirk J, Midgley K (2008) Vortex breakdown in swirling fuel injector flows. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 130:021503.1–021503.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van der Lans RP, Glarborg P, Dam-Johansen K, Larsen PS (1997) Residence time distributions in a cold, confined swirl flow: implications for chemical engineering combustion modeling. Chem Eng Sci 52:2743–2756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winterfield G (1965) On processes of turbulent exchange behind flame holders, The Combustion Institute, pp 1265–1275Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aero & Auto EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations