Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 1495–1505 | Cite as

Application of fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint to a hemispherical dome in unsteady transonic flow

  • Shuo Fang
  • Kevin J. Disotell
  • Samuel R. Long
  • James W. Gregory
  • Frank C. Semmelmayer
  • Robert W. Guyton
Research Article

Abstract

The current work focuses on the development and application of fast-responding polymer/ceramic pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) as an advanced surface pressure measurement technique for unsteady flow fields in large-scale wind tunnels. To demonstrate the unsteady PSP technique, the unsteady surface pressure distribution over a hemispherical dome placed in the United States Air Force Research Laboratory’s Trisonic Gasdynamics Facility (TGF) was studied by phase-locking to the characteristic frequency in the flow caused by an unsteady separated shear layer shed from the dome. The wind tunnel was operated at stagnation pressures of 23.92 and 71.84 kPa, with the test section flow at Mach 0.6. Under the two operating conditions, the predominant shear layer frequency was measured to be 272 and 400 Hz, respectively. The quasi-periodic shear layer frequency enabled a phase-averaged method to be employed for capturing the unsteady shock motion on the hemisphere. Unsteady pressure data resulting from this technique are shown to correlate well with measurements acquired by conventional measurement techniques. Measurement uncertainty in the phase-averaging technique will be discussed. To address measurement uncertainties from temperature sensitivity and model movement, a new implementation of an AC-coupled data representation is offered.

References

  1. Asai K, Kanda H, Cunningham CT, Erausquin R, Sullivan JP (1997) Surface pressure measurements in a cryogenic wind tunnel by using luminescent coatings. Proceedings of the 17th international congress on instrumentation in aerospace simulation facilities, Piscataway, NJ, pp 105–114Google Scholar
  2. Asai K, Amao Y, Iijima Y, Okura I, Nishide H (2000) Novel pressure-sensitive paint for cryogenic and unsteady wind tunnel testing. Proceedings of the 21st AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, AIAA 2000-2527, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell JH, McLachlan BG (1996) Image registration for pressure-sensitive paint applications. Exp Fluids 22(1):78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell JH, Schairer ET, Hand LA, Mehta RD (2001) Surface pressure measurements using luminescent coatings. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 33:155–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bencic TJ (2001) Calibration of detection angle for full field pressure-sensitive paint measurements. Proceedings of the 39th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA 2001-0307, Reno, NVGoogle Scholar
  6. Erausquin R, Cunningham CT, Sullivan JP, Asai K, Kanda H, Kunimasu T, Iijima Y (1998) Cryogenic pressure sensitive fluorescent paint systems. Proceedings of the 36th AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA 98-0588, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordeyev S, Jumper E (2010) Fluid dynamics and aero-optics of turrets. Prog Aerosp Sci. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.06.001
  8. Gregory JW (2004) Porous pressure-sensitive paint for measurement of unsteady pressures in turbomachinery. Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA 2004-0294, Reno, NVGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregory JW, Sakaue H, Sullivan JP (2002) Fluidic oscillator as a dynamic calibration tool. Proceedings of the 22nd aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, AIAA 2002-2701, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  10. Gregory JW, Sullivan JP, Wanis SS, Komerath NM (2006) Pressure-sensitive paint as a distributed optical microphone array. J Acoust Soc Am 119(1):251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregory JW, Asai K, Kameda M, Liu T, Sullivan JP (2008) A review of pressure-sensitive paint for high-speed and unsteady aerodynamics. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp 222(2):249–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein C, Engler RH (1999) Visualization of aerodynamic effects on a double-delta wing aircraft model using pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technique. J Vis 2(1):9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klein C, Henne U, Sachs WE, Egami Y, Mai H, Ondrus V, Beifuss U (2008) Application of pressure-sensitive paint for determination of dynamic surface pressures on an oscillating 2D profile in transonic flow. Proceedings of the 46th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA 2008-0278, Reno, NVGoogle Scholar
  14. Klein C, Sachs WE, Henne U, Borbye J (2010) Determination of transfer function of pressure-sensitive paint. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA 2010-0309, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu T, Sullivan JP (2005) Pressure and temperature sensitive paints. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu T, Campbell BT, Burns SP, Sullivan JP (1997) Temperature- and pressure-sensitive luminescent paints in aerodynamics. Appl Mech Rev 50(4):227–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McGraw CM, Bell JH, Khalil G, Callis JB (2006) Dynamic surface pressure measurements on a square cylinder with pressure sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 40(2):203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Puklin E, Carlson B, Gouin S, Costin C, Green E, Ponomarev S, Tanji H, Gouterman M (1999) Ideality of pressure-sensitive paint. 1. Platinum tetra (Pentaflourophenyl) porphine in flouracrylic polymer. J Appl Polym Sci 70:2795–2804Google Scholar
  19. Sakaue H (1999) Porous pressure sensitive paints for aerodynamic applications. MS Thesis, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, INGoogle Scholar
  20. Schairer ET (2002) Optimum thickness of pressure-sensitive paint for unsteady measurements. AIAA J 40(11):2312–2318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sugimoto D, Nagai H, Asai K, Hiraki K (2010) Experimental study on dyanmics instability of re-entry capsule-shaped body using pressure sensitive paint. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA 2010-320, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
  22. Vukasinovic B, Brzozowski D, Glezer A, Bower WW, Kibens V (2005) Separation control over a surface-mounted hemispherical shell. Proceedings of the 35th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, AIAA 2005-4878, Toronto, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  23. Yorita D, Nagai H, Asai K, Narumi T (2010) Unsteady PSP technique for measuring naturally-disturbed periodic phenomena. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA 2010-307, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuo Fang
    • 1
  • Kevin J. Disotell
    • 1
  • Samuel R. Long
    • 1
  • James W. Gregory
    • 1
  • Frank C. Semmelmayer
    • 2
  • Robert W. Guyton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Air Force Research LaboratoryWright-Patterson AFBDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations