Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 875–887 | Cite as

Spatially adaptive PIV interrogation based on data ensemble

  • Raf Theunissen
  • Fulvio Scarano
  • Michel L. Riethmuller
Research Article

Abstract

This paper proposes a specific application of the approach recently proposed by the authors to achieve an autonomous and robust adaptive interrogation method for PIV data sets with the focus on the determination of mean velocity fields. Under circumstances such as suboptimal flow seeding distribution and large variations in the velocity field properties, neither multigrid techniques nor adaptive interrogation with criteria based on instantaneous conditions offer enough robustness for the flow field analysis. A method based on the data ensemble to select the adaptive interrogation parameters, namely, the window size, aspect ratio, orientation, and overlap factor is followed in this study. Interrogation windows are sized, shaped and spatially distributed on the basis of the average seeding density and the gradient of the velocity vector field. Compared to the instantaneous approach, the ensemble-based criterion adapts the windows in a more robust way especially for the implementation of non-isotropic windows (stretching and orientation), which yields a higher spatial resolution. If the procedure is applied recursively, the number of correlation samples can be optimized to satisfy a prescribed level of window overlap ratio. The relevance and applicability of the method are illustrated by an application to a shock-wave-boundary layer interaction problem. Furthermore, the application to a transonic airfoil wake verifies by means of a dual-resolution experiment that the spatial resolution in the wake can be increased by using non-isotropic interrogation windows.

Keywords

Window Size Interrogation Window Layer Interaction Instantaneous Velocity Field Correlation Window 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The presented work is supported by the Dutch Technology Fundation STW, under the scheme “Innovation Impulse”, VIDI grant DLR.6189 and by Instituut voor de aanmoediging van innovatie door Wetenschap & Technologie in Vlaanderen (IWT, SBO project nr. 040092).

References

  1. Adrian RJ (1991) Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashok A, Ragni D, van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2008) Transonic airfoil aerodynamic characterization by means of PIV. In: 14th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 07–10 JulyGoogle Scholar
  3. Astarita T (2009) Adaptive space resolution for PIV. Exp Fluids 46:1115–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astarita T, Cardone G (2005) Analysis of interpolation schemes for image deformation methods in PIV. Exp Fluids 38:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fouras A, Soria J (1998) Accuracy of out-of-plane vorticity measurements derived from in-plane velocity field data. Exp Fluids 25:409–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heinz OM, Ilyushin BB, Markovich DM (2002) PIV-data validation algorithm based on statistical analysis for ensemble of turbulent velocity fields. In: 11th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 8–11 JulyGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang HT, Fiedler HE, Wang JJ (1993) Limitation and improvement of PIV part II: particle image distortion, a novel technique. Exp Fluids 15:263–273Google Scholar
  8. Humble RA, Scarano F, van Oudheusden BW (2007) Particle image velocimetry measurements of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. Exp Fluids 43:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keane RD, Adrian RJ (1990) Optimization of particle image velocimeter. part I: double pulsed systems. Meas Sci Technol 1:1202–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meinhart CD, Wereley ST, Santiago JG (2000) A PIV algorithm for estimating time-averaged velocity fields. J Fluids Eng 122:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ragni D, Ashok A, van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2009) Surface pressure and aerodynamic loads determination of a transonic airfoil based on particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 20:074005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sambridge M, Braun J, McQueen H (1995) Geophysical parametrization and interpolation of irregular data using natural neighbours. Geophys J Int 122:837–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Scarano F (2002) Iterative image deformation methods in PIV. Meas. Sci Tech 13:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scarano F (2003) Theory of non-isotropic spatial resolution in PIV. Exp Fluids 35:268–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scarano F, Riethmuller ML (2000) Advances in iterative multigrid PIV image processing. Exp Fluids 29:S51–S60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scarano F, van Oudheusden BW (2003) Planar velocity measurements of a two-dimensional compressible wake. Exp Fluids 34:430–441Google Scholar
  17. Schrijer FFJ, Scarano F (2008) Effect of predictor–corrector filtering on the stability and spatial resolution of iterative PIV interrogation. Exp Fluids 45:927–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Secord A, Heidrich W, Streit L (2002) Fast primitive distribution for illustration. In: Debevec P, Gibson S (ed) 13th Eurographics Workshop on RenderingGoogle Scholar
  19. Stephens JJ (1972) Distance distributions for randomly distributed data. Mon Weather Rev 100:60–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stitou A, Riethmuller ML (2001) Extension of PIV to super resolution using PTV. Meas Sci Technol 12:1398–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Theunissen R, Scarano F, Riethmuller ML (2007) An adaptive sampling and windowing interrogation method in PIV. Meas Sci Technol 18:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Theunissen R, Scarano F, Riethmuller ML (2008) On improvement of PIV image interrogation near stationary interfaces. Exp Fluids 45:557–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Unser M, Aldroubi A, Eden M (1993) B-spline signal processing: part II-efficient design and applications. IEEE Trans Signal Process 41–2:834–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Westerweel J (1994) Efficient detection of spurious vectors in particle image velocimetry data. Exp Fluids 16:236–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Westerweel J (2000) Theoretical analysis of the measurement precision in particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29:S3–S12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Westerweel J, Scarano F (2005) A universal detection criterion for the median test. Exp Fluids 39:1096–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weygandt JH, Mehta RD (1989) Asymptotic behaviour of a flat plate wake. Joint institute for aeronautics and acoustics, JIAA TR-95Google Scholar
  28. Young CN, Johnson DA, Weckman EJ (2004) A method to anchor displacement vectors to reduce uncertainty and improve particle image velocimetry results. Meas Sci Technol 15:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raf Theunissen
    • 1
  • Fulvio Scarano
    • 2
  • Michel L. Riethmuller
    • 1
  1. 1.von Karman Institute for Fluid DynamicsRhode-St-GenèseBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Aerospace Engineering-AerodynamicsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations