Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 195–207

Friction measurement in zero and adverse pressure gradient boundary layer using oil droplet interferometric method

Research Article

Abstract

The oil droplet interferometric technique has been used to investigate the skin friction distribution along a zero and adverse pressure gradient boundary layer developing in the Laboratoire de Mécanique de Lille wind tunnel. This experimental task was a part of the WALLTURB project, funded by the European Community, in order to bring significant progress in the understanding of near wall turbulence in boundary layers. Skin friction values close to 0.01 Pa have been measured with this optical method. A comparison with the results obtained with hot-wire anemometry and macro-PIV demonstrates the great potential of the oil droplet technique.

References

  1. Bernard A, Foucaut JM, Dupont P, Stanislas M (2003) Decelerating boundary layer: a new scaling and mixing length model. AIAA J 41(2):248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown JL, Naughton JW (1999) The thin oil film equation. NASA/TM-208767Google Scholar
  3. Brücker CH, Spatz J, Schröder W (2005) Feasibility study of wall shear stress imaging using microstructured surfaces with flexible micropillars. Exp Fluids 39:464–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlier J, Stanislas M (2005) Experimental study of eddy structures in a turbulent boundary layer using particle image velocimetry. J Fluids Mech 553:143–188CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Driver DM (1997) Application of oil film interferometry skin friction to large wind tunnels. AGARD Conference Proceedings CP-201Google Scholar
  6. Fernholz HH, Finley PJ (1996) The incompressible zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer: an assessment of the data. Prog Aerospace Sci 32:245–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foucaut JM, Kostas J, Stanislas M (2006) Wall shear stress measurement using stereoscopic PIV. 12th International symposium on flow visualization, Göttingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. Kornilov I, Pavlov AA, Shpak SI (1992) On the techniques of skin friction measurement using optical method. International conference on the methods of aerophysical research, NovosibirskGoogle Scholar
  9. Maksimov AI, Pavlov AA, Shevchenko AM (1994) Development of the optical skin friction measurement technique for supersonic flows. International conference on the methods of aerophysical research, NovosibirskGoogle Scholar
  10. Monson DJ, Mateer G (1993) Boundary layer transition and global skin friction measurement with an oil fringe imaging technique. SAE Paper 932550Google Scholar
  11. Naughton JW, Brown JL (1996) Surface interferometric skin-friction measurement technique. 19th AIAA advanced measurement and ground testing technology conference, 17–20 JuneGoogle Scholar
  12. Naughton JW, Sheplak M (2002) Modern development in shear-stress measurement. Prog Aerospace Sci 38:515–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ruedi JD, Nagib H, Osterlund J, Monkewitz PA (2003) Evaluation of three techniques for wall-shear measurements in three-dimensional flows. Exp Fluids 35:389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Squire LC (1961) The motion of a thin oil sheet under the steady boundary layer on a body. J Fluids Mech 11:161–179MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Tanner LH, Blows LG (1976) A study of the motion of oil films on surfaces in air flow, with application to the measurement of skin-friction. J Phys E 9:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy Pailhas
    • 1
  • P. Barricau
    • 1
  • Y. Touvet
    • 1
  • L. Perret
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Aerodynamics and Energetics Model DepartmentONERA/DMAEToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Mécanique de LilleUMR 8107Villeneuve d’AscqFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Mécanique des fluidesEcole Centrale de NantesNantesFrance

Personalised recommendations