Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 963–973 | Cite as

Aerodynamics of intermittent bounds in flying birds

  • Bret W. Tobalske
  • Jason W. D. Hearn
  • Douglas R. Warrick
Research Article

Abstract

Flap-bounding is a common flight style in small birds in which flapping phases alternate with flexed-wing bounds. Body lift is predicted to be essential to making this flight style an aerodynamically attractive flight strategy. To elucidate the contributions of the body and tail to lift and drag during the flexed-wing bound phase, we used particle image velocimetry (PIV) and measured properties of the wake of zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata, = 5), flying at 6–10 m s−1 in a variable speed wind tunnel as well as flow around taxidermically prepared specimens (= 4) mounted on a sting instrumented with force transducers. For the specimens, we varied air velocity from 2 to 12 m s−1 and body angle from −15° to 50°. The wake of bounding birds and mounted specimens consisted of a pair of counter-rotating vortices shed into the wake from the tail, with induced downwash in the sagittal plane and upwash in parasagittal planes lateral to the bird. This wake structure was present even when the tail was entirely removed. We observed good agreement between force measures derived from PIV and force transducers over the range of body angles typically used by zebra finch during forward flight. Body lift:drag (L:D) ratios averaged 1.4 in live birds and varied between 1 and 1.5 in specimens at body angles from 10° to 30°. Peak (L:D) ratio was the same in live birds and specimens (1.5) and was exhibited in specimens at body angles of 15° or 20°, consistent with the lower end of body angles utilized during bounds. Increasing flight velocity in live birds caused a decrease in CL and CD from maximum values of 1.19 and 0.95 during flight at 6 m s−1 to minimum values of 0.70 and 0.54 during flight at 10 m s−1. Consistent with delta-wing theory as applied to birds with a graduated-tail shape, trimming the tail to 0 and 50% of normal length reduced L:D ratios and extending tail length to 150% of normal increased L:D ratio. As downward induced velocity is present in the sagittal plane during upstroke of flapping flight, we hypothesize that body lift is produced during flapping phases. Future efforts to model the mechanics of intermittent flight should take into account that flap-bounding birds may support up to 20% of their weight even with their wings fully flexed.

References

  1. Barbosa A, Merino S, Cuervo JJ, De Lope F, Møller AP (2003) Feather damage of long tails in barn swallows. Ardea 91:85–90Google Scholar
  2. Batchelor GK (1967) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Biewener AA, Corning WR, Tobalske BW (1998) In vivo pectoralis muscle force–length behavior during level flight in pigeons (Columba livia). J Exp Biol 201:3293–3307Google Scholar
  4. Birch JM, Dickson WB, Dickinson MH (2004) Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers. J Exp Biol 207:1063–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruderer L, Liechti F, Bilo D (2001) Flexibility in flight behaviour of barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and house martins (Delichon urbica) tested in a wind tunnel. J Exp Biol 204:1473–1484Google Scholar
  6. Csicsáky M (1977a) Aerodynamische und Ballistische Untersuchungen an Kleinvögeln. PhD thesis, University of Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  7. Csicsáky MJ (1977b) Body-gliding in the zebra finch. Fortschr Zool 24:275–286Google Scholar
  8. Cuervo JJ, Møller AP, de Lope F (2003) Experimental manipulation of tail length in female barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) affects their future reproductive success. Behav Ecol 14:451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danielson R (1988) Parametre for fritflyvende småfugles flugt. Dan Orn Foren Tidsskr 82:59–60Google Scholar
  10. DeJong MJ (1983) Bounding flight in birds. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Dial KP, Biewener AA, Tobalske BW, Warrick DR (1997) Mechanical power output of bird flight. Nature 390:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans MR (2003) Birds’ tails do act like delta wings but delta-wing theory does not always predict the forces they generate. Proc Biol Sci 270:1379–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans MR, Rosén M, Park K, Hedenström A (2002) How do birds’ tails work? Delta-wing theory fails to predict tail shape during flight. Proc Biol Sci 269:1053–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hedenström A, Alerstam T (1995) Optimal flight speed of birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 348:471–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedenström A, Liechti L (2001) Field estimates of body drag coefficient on the basis of dives in passerine birds. J Exp Biol 204:1167–1175Google Scholar
  16. Hedenström A, Rosén M, Spedding GR (2005) Vortex wakes generated by robins Erithracus rubecula during free flight in a wind tunnel. J R Soc Interface 3:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hedenström A, Griethuijsen LV, Rosén M, Spedding GR (2006) Vortex wakes of birds: recent developments using digital particle image velocimetry in a wind tunnel. Anim Biol 56:535–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoerner SF (1965) Fluid-dynamic drag. Hoerner fluid dynamics. Bricktown, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  19. Hucho W, Sovran G (1993) Aerodynamics of vehicles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25:485–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marden JH (1994) From damselflights to pterosaurs: How burst and sustainable flight performance scale with size. Am J Physiol 266:R1077–R1084Google Scholar
  21. Maybury WJ (2000) The aerodynamics of bird bodies. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Maybury WJ, Rayner JMV (2001) The avian tail reduces body parasite drag by controlling flow separation and vortex shedding. Proc Biol Sci 1474:1405–1410Google Scholar
  23. Maybury WJ, Rayner JMV, Couldrick LB (2001) Lift generation by the avian tail. Proc Biol Sci 268:1443–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pennycuick CJ (1975) Mechanics of flight. In: Farner DS, King JR (eds) Avian biology, vol 5. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–75Google Scholar
  25. Pennycuick CJ, Obrecht HHIII, Fuller MR (1988) Empirical estimates of body drag of large waterfowl and raptors. J Exp Biol 135:253–264Google Scholar
  26. Pennycuick CJ, Klaassen M, Kvist A, Lindström AK (1996) Wingbeat frequency and the body drag anomaly: wind tunnel observations on a thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) and a teal (Anas crecca). J Exp Biol 199:2757–2765Google Scholar
  27. Raffel M, Willert C, Kompenhans J (2000) Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Rayner JMV (1977) The intermittent flight of birds. In: Pedley TJ (ed) Scale effects in animal locomotion. Academic Press, New York, pp 37–55Google Scholar
  29. Rayner JMV (1985) Bounding and undulating flight in birds. J Theor Biol 117:47–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rayner JMV (1999) Estimating power curves for flying vertebrates. J Exp Biol 202:3449–3461Google Scholar
  31. Spedding GR, Rayner JMV, Pennycuick CJ (1984) Momentum and energy in the wake of a pigeon (Columba livia) in slow flight. J Exp Biol 111:81–102Google Scholar
  32. Spedding GR, Hedenström A, Rosén M (2003a) Quantitative studies of the wakes of freely flying birds in a low-turbulence wind tunnel. Exp Fluids 34:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spedding GR, Rosén M, Hedenström A (2003b) A family of vortex wakes generated by a thrush nightingale in free flight in a wind tunnel over its entire natural range of flight speeds. J Exp Biol 206:2313–2344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stamhuis EJ, Nauwelaerts S (2005) Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs. II. Application of a vortex ring model to PIV data. J Exp Biol 208:1445–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor GK, Thomas ALR (2002) Animal flight dynamics. II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight. J Theor Biol 214:351–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas ALR (1993) On the aerodynamics of birds’ tails. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 340:361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomas ALR, Hedenström A (1998) The optimum flight speeds of flying animals. J Avian Biol 29:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas ALR, Taylor GK (2001) Animal flight dynamics. I. Stability in gliding fight. J Theor Biol 212:399–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tobalske BW (1995) Neuromuscular control and kinematics of intermittent flight in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J Exp Biol 198:1259–1273Google Scholar
  40. Tobalske BW (1996) Scaling of muscle composition, wing morphology, and intermittent flight behavior in woodpeckers. Auk 113:151–177Google Scholar
  41. Tobalske BW (2001) Morphology, velocity, and intermittent flight in birds. Am Zool 41:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tobalske BW (2007) Biomechanics of bird flight. J Exp Biol 210:3135–3146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tobalske BW, Dial KP (1994) Neuromuscular control and kinematics of intermittent flight in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Exp Biol 187:1–18Google Scholar
  44. Tobalske BW, Peacock WL, Dial KP (1999) Kinematics of flap-bounding flight in the zebra finch over a wide range of speeds. J Exp Biol 202:1725–1739Google Scholar
  45. Tobalske BW, Hedrick TL, Dial KP, Biewener AA (2003) Comparative power curves in bird flight. Nature 421:363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tobalske BW, Puccinelli LA, Sheridan DC (2005) Contractile activity of the pectoralis in the zebra finch according to mode and velocity of flap-bounding flight. J Exp Biol 208:2895–2901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tucker VA (1973) Bird metabolism during flight: evaluation of a theory. J Exp Biol 58:689–709Google Scholar
  48. Tucker VA (1990) Body drag, feather drag and interference drag of the mounting strut in a peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus. J Exp Biol 149:449–468Google Scholar
  49. Usherwood JR, Hedrick TL, McGowan CP, Biewener AA (2005) Dynamic pressure maps for wings and tails of pigeons in slow, flapping flight, and their energetic implications. J Exp Biol 208:355–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vogel S (1994) Life in moving fluids. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward-Smith AJ (1984a) Analysis of the aerodynamic performance of birds during bounding flight. Math Biosci 68:137–147MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ward-Smith AJ (1984b) Aerodynamic and energetic considerations relating to undulating and bounding flight in birds. J Theor Biol 111:407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warrick DR, Tobalske BW, Powers DP (2005) Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird. Nature 435:1094–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang X, Senior A, Ruhrmann A (2004) Vortices behind a bluff body with an upswept aft section in ground effect. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 25:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bret W. Tobalske
    • 1
  • Jason W. D. Hearn
    • 2
  • Douglas R. Warrick
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Biological Sciences, Field Research Station at Fort MissoulaUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations