Experiments in Fluids

, 45:675 | Cite as

Investigation of the vortex induced unsteadiness of a separation bubble via time-resolved and scanning PIV measurements

Research Article


A transitional separation bubble on the suction side of an SD7003 airfoil is considered. The transition process that forces the separated shear layer to reattach seems to be governed by Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities. Large scale vortices are formed due to this mechanism at the downstream end of the bubble. These vortices possess a three-dimensional structure and detach from the recirculation region, while other vortices are formed within the bubble. This separation of the vortex is a highly unsteady process, which leads to a bubble flapping. The structure of these vortices and the flapping of the separation bubble due to these vortices are temporally and spatially analyzed at angles of attack from 4° to 8° and chord-length based Reynolds numbers Re c = 20,000–60,000 using time-resolved PIV measurements in a 2D and a 3D set-up, i.e., stereo-scanning PIV measurements are done in the latter case. These measurements complete former studies at a Reynolds number of Re c = 20,000. The results of the time-resolved PIV measurements in a single light-sheet show the influence of the angle of attack and the Reynolds number. The characteristic parameters of the separation bubble are analyzed focusing on the unsteadiness of the separation bubble, e.g., the varying size of the main recirculation region, which characterizes the bubble flapping, and the corresponding Strouhal number are investigated. Furthermore, the impact of the freestream turbulence is investigated by juxtaposing the current and former results. The stereo-scanning PIV measurements at Reynolds numbers up to 60,000 elucidate the three-dimensional character of the vortical structures, which evolve at the downstream end of the separation bubble. It is shown that the same typical structures are formed, e.g., the c-shape vortex and the screwdriver vortex at each Reynolds number and angle of attack investigated and the occurrence of these patterns in relation to Λ-structures is discussed. To evidence the impact of the freestream turbulence, these results are compared with findings of former measurements.



This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the priority research program “SPP 1147 Bildgebende Messverfahren für die Strömungsanalyse” (Experimental Visualization Methods for Flow Analysis) under the contract SCHR 309/25.


  1. Burgmann S, Schröder W, Brücker Ch (2006) Scanning PIV measurements of a laminar separation bubble. Exp Fluids 41(2):319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgmann S, Dannemann J, Schröder W (2007) Time resolved and volumetric PIV measurement of the transitional separation bubble of an SD7003 airfoil. Exp Fluids 44(2):609–622Google Scholar
  3. Fitzgerald EJ, Mueller TJ (1990) Measurements in a separation bubble on an airfoil using laser velocimetry. AIAA J 28(4):584–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gad-el-Hak M (2001) Micro-Air-Vehicles: can they be controlled better? J Aircr 38(3):419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaster M (1966) The structure and behaviour of laminar separation bubbles, AGARD CP-4. Flow Sep 2:813–854Google Scholar
  6. Hain R, Kähler CJ (2005) Advanced evaluation of time-resolved PIV image sequences. In: 6th international symposium on particle image velocimetry, Pasadena, CA, 21–23 September 2005Google Scholar
  7. Jeong J, Hussain F (1995) On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 285:69–94MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Lang M, Rist U, Wagner S (2004) Investigations on controlled transition development in a laminar separation bubble by means of LDA and PIV. Exp Fluids 36:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McAuliffe BR, Yaras MI (2005) Separation-bubble-transition measurements on a low-Re airfoil using particle image velocimetry. Proceedings of GT2005, ASME Turbo Expo 2005, Reno, 6–9 June 2005, GT2005–68663Google Scholar
  10. Nash JF, Scruggs RM (1977) Unsteady boundary layer with reversal and separation, AGARD Conference on Unsteady Aerodynamics, AGARD-CP–227Google Scholar
  11. Ol MV, Hanff E, McAuliffe B, Scholz U, Kaehler C (2005) Comparison of laminar separation bubble measurements on a low reynolds number airfoil in three facilities, AIAA Paper 2005–5149, 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Toronto, Ontario, June 6–9, 2005Google Scholar
  12. O’Meara MM, Mueller TJ (1987) Laminar separation bubble characteristics on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA Journal 25(8):1033–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pauley LL, Moin P, Reynolds WC (1990) The structure of two-dimensional separation. J Fluid Mech 220:397–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raffel M, Willert C, Kompenhans J (1998) Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  15. Roberts WB (1980) Calculation of laminar separation bubbles and their effect on airfoil performance. AIAA J 18(1):25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Selig MS, Guglielmo JJ, Broeren AP, Giguère P (1995) Summary of low-speed airfoil data, vol Vol. 1. SoarTech Publications, Virginia Beach, p 292Google Scholar
  17. Tsai RY (1986) An efficient and accurate camera calibration technique for 3D machine vision, Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Miami Beach, 1986, pp 364–374Google Scholar
  18. Watmuff JH (1999) Evolution of a wave packet into vortex loops in a laminar separation bubble. J Fluid Mech 397:119–169MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Wieneke B (2005) Stereo-PIV using self-calibration on particle images. Exp Fluids 39(2):267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yang Z, Voke PR (2001) Large-eddy simulation of boundary-layer separation and transition at a change of surface curvature. J Fluid Mech 439:305–333MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yuan W, Khalid M, Windte J, Scholz U, Radespiel R (2005) An investigation of low-Reynolds-number flows past airfoils, 23rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Toronto, 6–9 June 2005Google Scholar
  22. Zhang W, Hain R, Kähler CJ (2007) Scanning PIV study on the laminar separation bubble on the SD7003 airfoil. In: 7th international symposium on particle image velocimetry, Rome, Italy, 11–14 September 2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Fluid Mechanics and Institute of AerodynamicsRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations