Experiments in Fluids

, 46:27 | Cite as

Temperature response of turbulent premixed flames to inlet velocity oscillations

  • B. Ayoola
  • G. Hartung
  • C. A. Armitage
  • J. Hult
  • R. S. Cant
  • C. F. Kaminski
Research Article

Abstract

Flame–turbulence interactions are at the heart of modern combustion research as they have a major influence on efficiency, stability of operation and pollutant emissions. The problem remains a formidable challenge, and predictive modelling and the implementation of active control measures both rely on further fundamental measurements. Model burners with simple geometry offer an opportunity for the isolation and detailed study of phenomena that take place in real-world combustors, in an environment conducive to the application of advanced laser diagnostic tools. Lean premixed combustion conditions are currently of greatest interest since these are able to provide low NOx and improved increased fuel economy, which in turn leads to lower CO2 emissions. This paper presents an experimental investigation of the response of a bluff-body-stabilised flame to periodic inlet fluctuations under lean premixed turbulent conditions. Inlet velocity fluctuations were imposed acoustically using loudspeakers. Spatially resolved heat release rate imaging measurements, using simultaneous planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) of OH and CH2O, have been performed to explore the periodic heat release rate response to various acoustic forcing amplitudes and frequencies. For the first time we use this method to evaluate flame transfer functions and we compare these results with chemiluminescence measurements. Qualitative thermometry based on two-line OH PLIF was also used to compare the periodic temperature distribution around the flame with the periodic fluctuation of local heat release rate during acoustic forcing cycles.

References

  1. Abu-Orf GM (1996), Laminar Flamelet Reaction Rate Modelling for Spark Ignition Engines. PhD thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayoola B (2006) Laser-based measurement of heat release rate and temperature in turbulent premixed flames. PhD thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayoola BO, Balachandran R, Frank JH, Mastorakos E, Kaminski CF (2006) Spatially resolved heat release rate measurements in turbulent premixed flames. Combust Flame 144(1–2):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armitage CA, Riley AJ, Cant RS, Dowling AP, Stow SR (2004) Flame transfer functions from experiments and CFD. In: ASME TURBO EXPO, 2004-GT-53820Google Scholar
  5. Armitage CA, Balachandran R, Mastorakos E, Cant RS (2006) Investigation of the nonlinear response of turbulent premixed flames to imposed inlet velocity oscillations. Combust Flame 146:419–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balachandran R, Ayoola BO, Kaminski CF, Dowling AP, Mastorakos E (2005) Experimental investigation of the nonlinear response of turbulent premixed flames to imposed inlet velocity oscillations. Combust Flame 143(1–2):37–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellows BD, Lieuwen T (2004) Nonlinear response of combustor to forced acoustic oscillations. In: 42nd Aerospace science meeting and exhibit (Reno, NV, USA)Google Scholar
  8. Bray KNC, Libby PA, Moss JB (1985) Unified modelling approach for premixed turbulent combustion. 1. General formulation. Combust Flame 61:87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brookes SJ, Cant RS, Dowling AP (1999) In: ASME TURBO EXPO, 99-GT-112Google Scholar
  10. Brookes SJ, Cant RS, Dowling AP, Dupére IIDJ (2000) In: ASME TURBO EXPO, 2000-GT-0104Google Scholar
  11. Cattolica RJ, Vosen SR (1986) Two-dimensional fluorescence imaging of a flame–vortex interaction. Combust Sci Technol 48(1-2):77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crosley DR (1981) Collisional effects on laser-induced fluorescence flame measurements. Opt Eng 27:511–521Google Scholar
  13. Daly BJ, Harlow FH (1970) Transport equations in turbulence. Phys Fluids 13:2634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dowling AP, Stow SR (2003) Acoustic analysis of gas turbine combustors. J Propuls Power 19(5):751–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dowling AP, Morgans AS (2005) Feedback controll of combustion oscillations. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 37:115–182CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckbreth AC (1996) Laser diagnostics for combustion temperature and species. Abacus Press, KentGoogle Scholar
  17. Echekki T, Chen JH (1996) Unsteady strain rate and curvature effects in turbulent premixed methane–air flames. Combust Flame 116:184–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fayouxa A, Zähringer K, Gicquela O, Rolona JC (2005) Experimental and numerical determination of heat release in counterflow premixed laminar flames. Proc Combust Inst 30:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaskell PH, Lau AK (1988) Comparison of 2 solution strategies for use with higher-order discretization schemes in fluid flow simulations. Int J Num Meth Fluids 8:617–641MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Garland NL, Crosley DR (1986) On the collisional quenching of electronically excited OH, NH, and CH in flames. In: 21st Symposium (international) on combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburg, pp 1693–1702Google Scholar
  21. Giezendanner-Thoben R, Meier U, Meier W, Aigner M (2005a) Phase-locked temperature measurements by two-line OH-PLIF thermometry of a self-excited combustion instability in a gas turbine model combustor. Flow Turbul Combust 75(1–4):317–333MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giezendanner-Thoben R, Meier U, Meier W, Heinze J, Aigner M (2005b) Phase-locked two-line OH planar laser-induced fluorescence thermometry in a pulsating gas turbine model combustor at atmospheric pressure. Appl Opt 44(31):6565–6577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartung G (2008) Laser diagnostic investigations of flame turbulence interactions under lean-premixed conditions. PhD thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartung G, Hult J, Kaminski CF, Rogerson J, Swaminathan N (2008) Effect of heat release on turbulence and its interaction with scalar in premixed combustion. Phys Fluids 20:035,110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Issa R (1986) Solution of the implicitely discretized fluid-flow equations by operator-splitting. J Comp Phys 62:40–65MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. Jambunathan K, Ju XY, Dobbins BN, Ashforthfrost S (1995) An improved cross-correlation technique for particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 6(5):507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kee RJ, Grcar JF, Smooke MD, Miller JA (1993) A FORTRAN program for modelling steady laminar one-dimensional premixed flames. Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND85-8240Google Scholar
  28. Launder BE, Reece GJ, Rodi W (1975) Progress in development od a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J Fluid Mech 68:537–566MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawn CJ, PoLIFke W (2004) A model for the thermoacoustic response of a premixed swirl burner, Part 2: the flame response. Combust Sci Technol 176(8):1359–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawn CJ, Evesque S, PoLIFke W (2004) A model for the thermoacoustic response of a premixed swirl burner, Part 1: acoustic aspects. Combustion Science and Technology 176(8):1331–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee JG, Santavicca D (2003) Experimental diagnostics for the study of combustion instabilities in lean premixed combustors. J Propuls Power 19(5):735–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee T, North GL, Santavicca DA (1993) Surface properties of turbulent premixed propane/air flames at various Lewis numbers. Combust Flame 93:445–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li S-P, Cant RS (1994) In: Fourth Biennial UMIST CFD ColloquiumGoogle Scholar
  34. Najm HN, Paul P, Mueller C, Wyckoff PS (1998) On the adequacy of certain experimental observables as measurements of flame burning rate. Combust Flame 113(3):312–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmer JL, Hanson RK (1996) Temperature imaging in a supersonic free jet of combustion gases with two-line OH fluorescence. Appl Opt 35(3):485–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paul PH, Najm HN (1998) Planar laser-induced fluorescence imaging of flame heat release rate. In: 27th International combustion symposium. Proc Combust Inst 27:43–50Google Scholar
  37. Pun W, Palm SL, Culick FEC (2003) Combustion dynamics of an acoustically forced flame. Combust Sci Technol 175(3):499–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Samaniego JM, Egolfopoulos FN, Bowman CT (1995) CO2* chemiluminescence in premixed flames. Combust Sci Technol 109(1–6):183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsujishita M, Hirano A, Yokoo M, Sakuraya T, Takeshita Y (1999) Accurate thermometry using NO and OH laser-induced fluorescence in an atmospheric pressure flame (checked by narrow-band N-2 coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering). JSME Int J Ser B Fluids Therm Eng 42(1):119–126Google Scholar
  40. Vagelopoulos CM, Frank JH (2005) An experimental and numerical study on the adequacy of CH as a flame marker in premixed methane flames. Proc Combust Inst 30:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watkins AP, Li S-P, Cant RS (1996) In: Society of automotive engineers, SAE 961190Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Ayoola
    • 1
  • G. Hartung
    • 1
  • C. A. Armitage
    • 3
  • J. Hult
    • 1
  • R. S. Cant
    • 3
  • C. F. Kaminski
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.SAOT School of Advanced Optical Technologies, Max Planck Research Group Division IIIUniversity Erlangen-NurembergNurembergGermany
  3. 3.Department of EngineeringUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations