Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 549–556

Volume self-calibration for 3D particle image velocimetry

Research Article

Abstract

Planar self-calibration methods have become standard for stereo PIV to correct misalignments between laser light sheet and calibration plane. Computing cross-correlation between images from camera 1 and 2 taken at the same time, non-zero disparity vectors indicate rotational and translational misalignments relative to the coordinate system defined by a calibration plate. This approach works well for thin light sheets but fails for extended volumes recorded in 3D-PTV or tomographic PIV experiments. Here it is primarily necessary to correct calibration errors leading to triangulation errors in 3D-PTV or in degraded tomographic volume reconstruction. Tomographic PIV requires calibration accuracies of a fraction of a pixel throughout the complete volume, which is difficult to achieve experimentally. A new volumetric self-calibration technique has been developed based on the computation of the 3D position of matching particles by triangulation as in 3D-PTV. The residual triangulation error (‘disparity’) is then used to correct the mapping functions for all cameras. A statistical clustering method suitable for dense particle images has been implemented to find correct disparity map peaks from true particle matches. Disparity maps from multiple recordings are summed for better statistics. This self-calibration scheme has been validated using several tomographic PIV experiments improving the vector quality significantly. The relevance for other 3D velocimetry methods is discussed.

References

  1. Brücker Ch (1996) 3-D scanning-particle-image-velocimetry: technique and application to a spherical cap wake flow. Exp Fluids 56:157–179Google Scholar
  2. Calluaud D, David L (2004) Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry measurements of a flow around a surface-mounted block. Exp Fluids 36:33–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coudert S, Schon JP (2001) Back-projection algorithm with misalignment corrections for 2D3C stereoscopic PIV. Meas Sci Technol 12:1371–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elsinga GE, Scarano F, Wieneke B, van Oudheusden BW (2006) Tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 41:933–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hartley R, Sturm P (1994) Triangulation. ARPA Image Understanding Workshop, Monterey, pp 957–966Google Scholar
  6. Hori T, Sakakibara J (2004) High speed scanning stereoscopic PIV for 3D vorticity measurement in liquids. Meas Sci Technol 15:1067–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maas HG (1996) Contributions of digital photogrammatry to 3D PTV. In: Dracos T (ed) Three-dimensional velocity and vorticity measuring and image annalysis techniques. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 191–208Google Scholar
  8. Michaelis D, Poelma C, Scarano F, Westerweel J, Wieneke B (2006) A 3D time-resolved cylinder wake survey by Tomographic PIV. In: 12th international symposium on flow visualization, Göttingen, Germany, 10–14 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  9. Prasad A (2000) Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Scarano F, David L, Bsibsi M, Calluaud D (2005) S-PIV comparative assessment: image dewarping + misalignment correction and pinhole + geometric back projection. Exp Fluids 39:257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Soloff SM, Adrian RJ, Liu ZC (1997) Distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8:1441–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Westerweel J, Scarano F (2005) A universal detection criterion for the median test. Exp Fluids 39–6, 1096Google Scholar
  13. Wieneke B (2005) Stereo-PIV using self-calibration on particle images. Exp Fluids 39:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wieneke B, Taylor S (2006) Fat-sheet PIV with computation of full 3D-strain tensor using tomographic reconstruction. In: 13th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  15. Willert C (1997) Stereoscopic digital particle image velocimetry for application in wind tunnel flows. Meas Sci Technol 8:1465–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LaVision GmbHGottingenGermany

Personalised recommendations