Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 943–953 | Cite as

Evolution of vortex structures in an electromagnetically excited separated flow

Research Article


Time periodic wall parallel Lorentz forces have been used to excite the separated flow on the suction side of an inclined flat plate. Experiments for a Reynolds number of 104 and an angle of attack of α = 13° are reported. The controlled flow is characterised by a small number of relatively large scale vortices, which are related to the control mechanism. The influence of the main parameters, i.e. the excitation frequency, amplitude and wave form on the suction side flow structures was investigated by analysing time resolved particle image velocimetry (TR-PIV) measurements using continuous wavelet analysis for vortex detection and characterisation. Statistical analysis of the coherent structures of the flow was performed on a large amount of data samples.



Financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in frame of the Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 609 is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Adrian RJ (1996) Stochastic estimation of the structure of turbulent fields. In: Bonnet JP (ed) Eddy structure identification. Springer, New York, pp 145–195Google Scholar
  2. Boeuf J, Lagmich Y, Unfer T, Callegari T, Pitchford L (2007) Electrohydrodynamic force in dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:652–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonnet JP, Delville J, Glauser MN, Antonia RA, Bisset DK, Cole DR, Fiedler HE, Garem JH, Hilberg D, Jeong J, Kevlahan NKR, Ukeiley LS, Vincendeau E (1998) Collaborative testing of eddy structure identification methods infree turbulent shear flows. Exp Fluids 25:197–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouras C, Nagib H, Durst F, Heim U (2000) Lift and drag control on a lambda wing using leading-edge slot pulsation of various wave forms. Bull Am Phys Soc 45(9):30Google Scholar
  5. Brown G, Roshko A (1974) On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J Fluid Mech 64:775–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cierpka C, Weier T, Gerbeth G (2007) Electromagnetic control of separated flows using periodic excitation with different wave forms. Notes Numer Fluid Mech Multidisciplinary Des 95:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farge M (1992) Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 24:395–457CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Gad-el Hak M (2000) Flow control: passive, active, and reactive flow management. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Gailitis A, Lielausis O (1961) On a possibility to reduce the hydrodynamic resistance of a plate in an electrolyte. Appl Magnetohydrodyn Rep Phys Inst 12:143–146 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Greenblatt D, Wygnanski I (2000) The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Prog Aero Sci 36:487–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grienberg E (1961) On determination of properties of some potential fields. Appl Magnetohydrodyn Rep Phys Inst 12:147–154 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Jeong J, Hussain F (1995) On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 285:69–94MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Jukes TN, Choi KS, Johnson GA, Scott SJ (2006) Characterization of surface plasma-induced wall flows trough velocity and temperature measurements. AIAA J 44(4):764–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Likhanskii AV, Shneider MN, Macheret SO, Miles RB (2007) Modeling of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators driven by repetitive nanosecond pulses. Phys Plasmas 14 (Article No. 073501)Google Scholar
  15. Margalit S, Greenblatt D, Seifert A, Wygnanski I (2005) Delta wing stall and roll control using segmented piezoelectric fluidic actuators. J Aircraft 42(3):698–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raffel M, Willert C, Kompenhans J (1998) Particle image velocimetry, a practical guide. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Rice W (1961) Propulsion system. US Patent 2,997,013Google Scholar
  18. Schram C (2002) Application of wavelet transform in vortical flows. In: VKI LS 2002-04, post-processing of experimantal and numerical data, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  19. Schram C, Rambaud P, Riethmuller M (2004) Wavelet based eddy structure eduction from a backward facing step flow investigated using particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 36:233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seifert A, Greenblatt D, Wygnanski I (2004) Active separation control: an overview of Reynolds and Mach number effects. Aerosp Sci Technol 8:569–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shatrov V, Gerbeth G (2007) Magnetohydrodynamic drag reduction and its efficiency. Phys Fluids 19:035109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sutton G, Sherman A (1965) Engineering magnetohydrodynamics. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Weier T (2005) Elektromagnetische Strömungskontrolle mit wandparallelen Lorentzkräften in schwach leitfähigen Fluiden. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät MaschinenwesenGoogle Scholar
  24. Weier T, Gerbeth G (2004) Control of separated flows by time periodic Lorentz forces. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 23:835–849MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weier T, Fey U, Gerbeth G, Mutschke G, Lielausis O, Platacis E (2001) Boundary layer control by means of wall parallel Lorentz forces. Magnetohydrodynamics 37(1/2):177–186Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forschungszentrum Dresden-RossendorfDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations