Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 367–380 | Cite as

Identification of vortex pairs in aircraft wakes from sectional velocity data

  • Carl F. v. Carmer
  • Robert Konrath
  • Andreas Schröder
  • Jean-Claude Monnier
Research Paper


The dynamics of multiple-vortex wake systems behind aircraft endangering air traffic can be assessed also from physical modelling. Large-scale laboratory investigations of multiple-vortex systems have been performed in a free-flight laboratory and in a water towing tank. Specialized PIV measurements provide time-resolved flow velocity fields normal to the wake axis. The applicability of various ∇u-based vortex identification schemes to planar velocity data is addressed and demonstrated for unequal-strength co- and counter-rotating vortex pairs. Large vortices shed off the wing tips and flaps are identified employing a ∇u-based criterion. Their cooperative mechanisms of generation and decay are evidenced from iso-surfaces of squared swirling strength and from further characteristic vortex parameters.


Vortex Particle Image Velocimetry Vortex Core Vortical Structure Particle Image Velocimetry Measurement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



C.F.C. and R.K. are indebted to the joint ONERA/DLR expert group comprising J. Agocs, E. Brunel, K. Christou, P. Coton, J.-P. Evard, C. Fatien, H. Frahnert, C. Geiler, A. Gilliot, A. Heider, H. Mattner, J.-C. Monnier, A. Schröder, P. Simon, and D. Thibaut for preparing and conducting the catapult measurements, and to A. Heider for his assistance in performing the PIV evaluation (Sect. 3). F. Bao and H. Vollmers provided the PIV data of the towing tank measurements (Sect. 4). The authors wish to thank A. de Bruin and E. Coustols for their useful information and helpful remarks. The support of the European Commission co-funding the AWIATOR project in its 5th framework program is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Adrian RJ, Christensen KT, Liu ZC (2000) Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp Fluids 29(3):275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao F, Vollmers, H (2005) Alleviation of end-effect in facilities for far wake investigations. In: 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA 2005–0907. AIAA, RenoGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao F, Vollmers H, Mattner H (2003) Experimental study on controlling wake vortex in water towing tank. In: 20th International congress on instrumentation in aerospace simulation facilities, 2003: ICIASF ’03, pp 214–223Google Scholar
  4. Bristol RL, Ortega JM, Marcus PS, Savaş Ö (2004) On cooperative instabilities of parallel vortex pairs. J Fluid Mech 517:331–358zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Carmer CFv (2005) Shallow turbulent wake flows: momentum and mass transfer due to large-scale coherent vortical structures, Schriftenreihe am Institut für Hydromechanik der Universität Karlsruhe (TH), vol 2005/2. Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmer CFv, Heider A, Schröder A, Konrath R, Agocs J, Gilliot A, Monnier JC (2007) Evaluation of large-scale wing vortex wakes from multi-camera PIV measurements in free-flight laboratory. In: Schröder A, Willert CE (eds) Particle Image Velocimetry: New Developments and Recent Applications, Topics Appl. Physics, vol. 112, Springer, Berlin, pp. 379–396. (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Carmer CFv, Konrath, R (2006) Influence of Reynolds number on generation and decay of aircraft wakes: experimental investigation using generic models, F13 and F13X. Tech. Rep. DLR-IB 224-2006 A 29, German Aerospace Center (DLR)Google Scholar
  8. Chakraborty P, Balachandar S, Adrian RJ (2005) On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes. J Fluid Mech 535:189–214zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen AL, Jacob JD, Savaş Ö (1999) Dynamics of corotating vortex pairs in the wakes of flapped airfoils. J Fluid Mech 382:155–193zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Chong MS, Perry AE, Cantwell BJ (1990) A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields. Phys Fluids A 2(5):765–777CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Coustols E (2005) Testing in wind tunnels, towing tank and B20 catapult. In: AWIATOR technical workshop, Bremen, Germany, 5/6 October 2005Google Scholar
  12. Coustols E, Jacquin L, Schrauf, G (2006) Status of wake vortex alleviation in the framework of European collaboration: validation using tests and CFD results. In: Wesseling P, Oñate E, Périaux J (eds) European conference on computational fluid dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD 2006, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands. TU Delft, 5–8 September 2006Google Scholar
  13. Crouch J (2005) Airplane trailing vortices and their control. C R Phys 6(4–5):487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crouch JD (1997) Instability and transient growth for two trailing-vortex pairs. J Fluid Mech 350:311–330zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Dallmann U, Hilgenstock A, Riedelbauch S, Schulte-Werning B, Vollmers, H (1991) On the footprints of three-dimensional separated vortex flows around blunt bodies. In: 67th Meeting of the FDP symposium on vortex flow aerodynamics, Scheveningen, AGARD Conf. Proc., vol 494, pp. 9.1–9.13, 1–4 October 1990Google Scholar
  16. De Gregorio F, Ragni A (2003) Wake vortex characterization in towing tank facilities using PIV technique. In: 41st Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, AIAA-2003-93, 6–9 January 2003Google Scholar
  17. Dubief Y, Delcayre F (2000) On coherent-vortex identification in turbulence. J Turbul 1(11):1–22CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerz T, Holzapfel F, Bryant W, Kopp F, Frech M, Tafferner A, Winckelmans G (2005) Research towards a wake-vortex advisory system for optimal aircraft spacing. C R Phys 6(4–5):501–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerz T, Holzäpfel F, Darracq D (2002) Commercial aircraft wake vortices. Prog Aerosp Sci 38(3):181–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilliot A, Geiler C, Monnier JC, Fatien C, Schröder A, Vollmers H (2004) Adaption des moyens de mesures PIV au B20. In: 9e Congrès Francophone de Vélocimétrie LaserGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P (1988) Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Report CTR-S88, Center for Turbulence ResearchGoogle Scholar
  22. Hussain AKMF (1986) Coherent structures and turbulence. J Fluid Mech 173:303–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacquin L, Fabre D, Sipp D, Coustols E (2005) Unsteadiness, instability and turbulence in trailing vortices. C R Phys 6(4–5):399–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacquin L, Fabre D, Sipp D, Theofilis V, Vollmers H (2003) Instability and unsteadiness of aircraft wake vortices. Aerosp Sci Technol 7(8):577–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeong J, Hussain F (1995) On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 285:69–94zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. Moet H, Laporte F, Chevalier G, Poinsot T (2005) Wave propagation in vortices and vortex bursting. Phys Fluids 17(5):054109CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Ortega JM, Bristol RL, Savaş Ö (2003) Experimental study of the instability of unequal-strength counter-rotating vortex pairs. J Fluid Mech 474:35–84zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rennich SC, Lele SK (1999) Method for accelerating the destruction of aircraft wake vortices. J Aircraft 36(2):398–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Savaş Ö (2005) Experimental investigations on wake vortices and their alleviation. C R Phys 6(4–5):415–429Google Scholar
  30. Scarano F, van Wijk C, Veldhuis L (2002) Traversing field of view and ar-piv for mid-field wake vortex investigation in a towing tank. Exp Fluids 33(6):950–961Google Scholar
  31. Schram C, Rambaud P, Riethmuller M (2004) Wavelet based eddy structure eduction from a backward facing step flow investigated using particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 36(2):233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spalart PR (1998) Airplane trailing vortices. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30(1):107–138CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. Vollmers H (2001) Detection of vortices and quantitative evaluation of their main parameters from experimental velocity data. Meas Sci Technol 12(8):1199–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van der Wall BG, Richard H (2006) Analysis methodology for 3C-PIV data of rotary wing vortices. Exp Fluids 40(5):798–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weiss J (1991) The dynamics of enstrophy transfer in two-dimensional hydrodynamics. Phys D 48:273–294CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Winckelmans G, Cocle R, Dufresne L, Capart R (2005) Vortex methods and their application to trailing wake vortex simulations. C R Phys 6(4–5):467–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhou J, Adrian RJ, Balachandar S, Kendall TM (1999) Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J Fluid Mech 387:353–396zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl F. v. Carmer
    • 1
  • Robert Konrath
    • 1
  • Andreas Schröder
    • 1
  • Jean-Claude Monnier
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow TechnologyGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)GöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Applied Aerodynamics DepartmentONERA-DAAPLille CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations