Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 131–142

A particle-image based wave profile measurement technique

Research Article


Wave profile measurements are important for computing wave characteristics and for studying the aqueous boundary layer formed beneath surface waves. The measurement technique presented here made use of digital imagery and a detection algorithm referred to as the variable threshold method. The technique can measure wind generated waves as short as 10 pixels (1.44 mm) in wavelength. The average r.m.s. quantization error was found to be ±0.29 pixels (±0.04 mm) using simulated wave profiles and the average bias error was estimated to be 0.07 pixels (0.01 mm) from real still water profiles. The magnitude of all other types of random errors was estimated to be approximately ±0.64 pixels (±0.09 mm) using real wind wave profiles. A series of morphological operations, used to correct for non-uniform seed densities, improved the accuracy of the detected wave profiles by a factor of five. The variable threshold method detected real wind wave profiles 3.5 times more accurately than the standard constant threshold method and had total r.m.s. errors that ranged from ±0.7 (±0.1 mm) to ±1.1 (±0.16 mm) pixels.


  1. Jähne B (1997) Digital image processing—concepts, algorithms, and scientific applications, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Law CNS, Khoo BC, Chew TC (1999) Turbulence structures in the immediate vicinity of the shear-free air–water interface induced by a deeply submerged jet. Exp Fluids 27:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lin HJ, Perlin M (1998) Improved methods for thin, surface boundary layer investigations. Exp Fluids 25:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Melville WK, Veron F, Whitey CJ (2002) The velocity field under breaking waves: coherent structures and turbulence. J Fluid Mech 454:203–233CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Mukto MA, Atmane MA, Loewen MR (2005) Accurate detection of wind wave profiles. In: Proceedings of the 2nd coastal, estuary & offshore engineering specialty conference, 33rd CSCE annual conference, Toronto, Canada, 10 p, CD-RomGoogle Scholar
  6. Peirson WL (1997) Measurement of surface velocities and shears at a wavy air–water interface using particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 23:427–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Siddiqui MHK, Loewen MR, Richardson C, Asher WE, Jessup AT (2001) Simultaneous particle image velocimetry and infrared imagery of microscale breaking waves. Phys Fluids 13:1891–1903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stansell P, MacFarlane C (2002) Experimental investigation of wave breaking criteria based on wave phase speeds. J Physical Oceanography 32:1269–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Zarruk GA (2005) Measurement of free surface deformation in PIV images. Meas Sci Technol 16:1970–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.SNC Lavalin Inc.CalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations