Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 859–875 | Cite as

Effects of jet velocity profiles on a round jet in cross-flow

Research Article


This paper reports the results of an experimental investigation on the effects of jet velocity profiles on the flow field of a round jet in cross-flow (JICF) using laser-induced fluorescence and digital particle-image velocimetry techniques (DPIV). Tophat and parabolic jets were considered, with the momentum ratios (MRs) ranging from 2.3 to 5.8. Results show that the thicker shear layer associated with a parabolic JICF is able to delay the formation of leading-edge and lee-side vortices when compared to the tophat JICF at the corresponding MR. As a result, there is an increase in jet penetration and a reduction in the near-field entrainment of cross-flow fluid by a parabolic JICF. Also, the less coherent nature of the leading-edge and lee-side vortices in a parabolic JICF is more likely to break up sporadically into smaller-scaled vortices. In addition, DPIV results show that a parabolic JICF exhibits not only a faster velocity recovery of cross-flow fluid at the jet lee-side than the corresponding tophat JICF, it also consistently registers a higher magnitude of the peak average vorticity than the tophat JICF for all MR considered. Despite these differences, the time-averaged flow topology for both cases share many salient features.


  1. Andreopoulos J, Rodi W (1984) Experimental investigation of jets in a crossflow. J Fluid Mech 138:93–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchard JN, Brunet Y, Merlen A (1999) Influence of a counter rotating vortex pair on the stability of a jet in a cross-flow: an experimental study by flow visualizations. Exp Fluids 26:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadwell JE, Breidenthal RE (1984) Structure and mixing of a transverse jet in incompressible flow. J Fluid Mech 148:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chassing P, George J, Claria A, Sananes F (1974) Physical characteristics of subsonic jets in a cross-stream. J Fluid Mech 62:41–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coelho SLV, Hunt JCR (1989) The dynamics of the near field of strong jets in crossflows. J Fluid Mech 200:95–120MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cortelezzi L, Karagozian AR (2001) On the formation of the counter-rotating vortex pair in transverse jets. J Fluid Mech 446:347–373MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Eiff OS, Keffer JF (1997) On the structures in the near-wake region of an elevated turbulent jet in a crossflow. J Fluid Mech 333:161–195CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Fric TF, Roshko A (1994) Vortical structure in the wake of a transverse jet. J Fluid Mech 279:1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hale CA, Plesniak MW, Ramadhyani S (2000) Structural features and surface heat transfer associated with a row of short-hole jets in crossflow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21:542–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasselbrink EF, Mungal MG (2001) Transverse jets and jet flames. Part 1. Scaling laws for strong transverse jets. J Fluid Mech 443:1–25CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Haven BA, Kurosaka M (1997) Kidney and anti-kidney vortices in crossflow jets. J Fluid Mech 352:27–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamotani Y, Greber I (1972) Experiments on turbulent jet in a crossflow. AIAA J 10:1425–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keffer JF, Baines WD (1963) The round turbulent jet in a cross wind. J Fluid Mech 15:481–496CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Kelso RM, Smits AJ (1995) Horseshoe vortex systems resulting from the interaction between a laminar boundary-layer and a transverse jet. Phys Fluids 7:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelso RM, Lim TT, Perry AE (1996) An experimental study of round jets in cross-flow. J Fluid Mech 306:111–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lim TT, New TH, Luo SC (2001) On the development of large-scale structures of a jet normal to a cross-flow. Phys Fluids 13:770–775CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Margason RJ (1993) Fifty years of jet in crossflow research. In: AGARD symposium on a jet in crossflow. Winchester, UK, AGARD CP-534Google Scholar
  18. Muppidi S, Mahesh K (2005) Study of trajectories of jets in crossflow using direct numerical simulations. J Fluid Mech 530:81–100CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. New TH, Lim TT, Luo SC (1999) On the effects of velocity profiles on the topological structures of a jet in cross-flow. Proc TSFP 1:647–652Google Scholar
  20. New TH, Lim TT, Luo SC (2003) Elliptic jets in cross-flow. J Fluid Mech 494:119–140CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. New TH, Lim TT, Luo SC (2004) A flow field study of an elliptic jet in cross-flow using DPIV technique. Exp Fluids 36:604–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peterson SD, Plesniak MW (2002) Short-hole jet-in-crossflow velocity field and its relationship to film-cooling performance. Exp Fluids 33:889–898Google Scholar
  23. Peterson SD, Plesniak MW (2004) Evolution of jets emanating from short holes into crossflow. J Fluid Mech 503:57–91CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Plesniak MW, Cusano DM (2005) Scalar mixing in a confined rectangular jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 524:1–45CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Pratte BD, Baines WD (1967) Profiles of the round turbulent jet in a cross-flow. J Hydraulics Div ASCE 92:53–64Google Scholar
  26. Rivero A, Ferre JA, Giralt F (2001) Organized motions in a jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 444:117–149CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith SH, Mungal MG (1998) Mixing, structure and scaling of the jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 357:83–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Su LK, Mungal MG (2004) Simultaneous measurements of scalar and velocity field evolution in turbulent crossflowing jets. J Fluid Mech 513:1–45CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Yuan LL, Street RL, Ferziger JH (1999) Large-eddy simulations of a round jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 379:71–104CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of EngineeringUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations