Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 651–666 | Cite as

Experimental analysis of liquid–gas interface at low Weber number: interface length and fractal dimension

  • Christophe Dumouchel
  • Jean Cousin
  • Kaëlig Triballier
Research Article


The present paper reports an experimental investigation on atomizing liquid flows produced by simplified cavity nozzles. The Weber number being kept low, the sprays produced by these injectors depend on the liquid flow characteristics only, and more precisely, on the non-axial kinetic energy and of the turbulent kinetic energy at the nozzle exit. The investigation reported here concentrates on the characterization of liquid flows during atomization by measuring the spatial variation of the local interface length and of the local interface fractal dimension. Both parameters were found representative of the physics of atomization process: they depend on the characteristics of the flow issuing from the nozzle and they are related to the subsequent drop size distribution. The local interface length is representative of the amount of liquid–gas interface surface area, and is a function of both the non-axial and the turbulent kinetic energies at the nozzle exit. The fractal dimension is representative of the tortuosity of the liquid–gas interface and, as expected, is mainly related to the turbulent kinetic energy at the nozzle exit. As far as the drop size distribution is concerned, it is found that the local interface length at the instant of break-up determines a representative drop diameter of some kind, whereas the fractal dimension at the same instant controls the dispersion of the distribution.



The authors would like to warmly thank Cyril Mauger for his precious help in the present experimental work.


  1. Amer AA, Lai MC (1995) Time resolved measurements in transient port injector sprays. SAE Tech Pap Ser 950509Google Scholar
  2. Bérubé D, Jébrak M (1999) High precision boundary fractal analysis for shape characterization. Comp Geosci 25:1059–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaisot JB, Adeline S (2000) Determination of the growth rate of instability of low velocity free falling jets. Exp Fluids 29:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaisot JB, Adeline S (2003) Instabilities on a free falling jet under an internal flow break-up mode regime. Int J Multiphas Flow 29:629–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chehroudi B, Talley B (2004) The fractal geometry of round turbulent cryogenic nitrogen jets at subcritical and supercritical pressures. Atomization Spray 14:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chehroudi B, Talley B, Coy E (2002) Visual characteristics and initial growth rates of round cryogenic jets at subcritical and supercritical pressures. Phys Fluid 14:850–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimotakis PE, Miake-Lye WG, Papantoniou DA (1983) Structure and dynamics of round turbulent jets. Phys Fluids 26:3185–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dumouchel C, Cousin J, Triballier K (2005) On the role of the liquid flow characteristics on low Weber number atomization processes. Exp Fluids 38(5):637–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eroglu H, Chigier N (1991) Wave characteristics of liquid jets from airblast coaxial atomizers. Atomization Spray 1:349–366Google Scholar
  10. Glodowski ML, Michalek DJ, Evers LW (1996) The use of results from computational fluid dynamic fuel injector modeling to predict spray characteristics. SAE Tech Pap Ser 961191Google Scholar
  11. Guessasma S, Montavon G, Coddet C (2003) On the implementation of the fractal concept to quantify thermal spray deposit surface characteristics. Surf Coat Technol 173:24–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heyse J, Schatz F, Ader B, Schlerfer J, Haubold S (1997) Electroformed multilayer orifice plate for improved fuel injection characteristics. Sae Tech Pap Ser 971070Google Scholar
  13. Lai MC, Zhao FQ, Amer AA, Chue TH (1994) An experimental and analytical investigation of the spray structure from automotive port injectors. SAE Tech Pap Ser 941873Google Scholar
  14. Lasheras JC, Villermaux E, Hopfinger E (1998) Break-up and atomization of a round water jet. J Fluid Mech 357:351–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lefebvre AH (1989) Atomization and sprays. Hemisphere, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Mandelbrot B (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. WH Freeman & Co, NYGoogle Scholar
  17. Michalek DJ, Peschke BD, Evers LW (1997) Computational design of experiments for compound fuel injector nozzles. SAE Tech Pap Ser 971617Google Scholar
  18. Parrish S, Evers L (1995) Spray characteristics of compound silicon micro machined port fuel injector orifices. SAE Tech Pap Ser 950510Google Scholar
  19. Rayleigh L (1879) On the instability of jets. Proc Lond Math Soc 10:4–13Google Scholar
  20. Ren WM, Sayar H (2001) Influence of nozzle geometry on spray targeting and atomization for port fuel injector. SAE Tech Pap Ser 2001-0608Google Scholar
  21. Rivette SM, Evers LW (1996) Compound port fuel injector nozzle droplet sizes and spray patterns. SAE Tech Pap Ser 960114Google Scholar
  22. Shavit U, Chigier N (1995) Fractal dimensions of liquid jet interface under break-up. Atomization Spray 5:525–543Google Scholar
  23. Smith TG, Lange GD, Marks WB (1996) Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology—dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals. J Neurosci Meth 69:123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sowa WA (1992) Interpreting mean drop diameters using distribution moments. Atomization Spray 2:1–15Google Scholar
  25. Sreenivasan KR (1991) Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:539–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sreenivasan KR, Meneveau C (1986) The fractal facets of turbulence. J Fluid Mech 173:357–386Google Scholar
  27. Taylor JJ, Hoyt JW (1983) Water jet photography—techniques and methods. Exp Fluids 1:113–120Google Scholar
  28. Triballier K (2003) Etude energetique des processus d’atomisation primaire; application au comportement des injecteurs essence basse pression à triple disques. PhD Thesis, University of Rouen, France, 19th December 2003Google Scholar
  29. Zhao FQ, Lai MC (1995) The spray characteristics of automotive port fuel injection—a critical review. SAE Tech Pap Ser 950506Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christophe Dumouchel
    • 1
  • Jean Cousin
    • 1
  • Kaëlig Triballier
    • 1
  1. 1.UMR 6614—CORIAUniversité et INSA de RouenSaint Etienne du RouvrayFrance

Personalised recommendations