Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 407–419 | Cite as

Extended glare point velocimetry and sizing for bubbly flows

  • S. Dehaeck
  • J. P. A. J. van Beeck
  • M. L. Riethmuller
Originals

Abstract

A novel measuring technique for bubbly flows, named glare point velocimetry and sizing (GPVS), was developed in order to measure both bubble size and velocity with high accuracy in a 2D plane. This is accomplished by observing glare points in-focus under an observation angle of 96°. When a second laser-sheet is added, even higher accuracies are obtained and the relative refractive index of the bubble can be measured. It also allows non-spherical bubbles to be rejected and arbitrary angles to be used (e.g. 90°). The accuracy of the size and refractive index measurements was found to be within 1.3%.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded with fellowship SB-031241 granted by the Flemish Institute for the Promotion of Scientific and Technological Research in the Industry (IWT).

References

  1. Akasaka Y, Kawaguchi T, Maeda M (2002) Application of interferometric laser imaging technique to a transient spray flow. In: 11th international symposium on applications of laser to fluid mechanics, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  2. Aybers NM, Tapucu A (1969) Studies on the drag and shape of gas bubbles rising through a stagnant liquid. Warme Stoffubertrag 2:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. van Beeck J, Giannoulis D, Zimmer L, Riethmuller M (1999) Global rainbow thermometry for droplet-temperature measurement. Opt Lett 24(23):1696–1698Google Scholar
  4. Bongiovanni C, Chevaillier JP, Fabre J (1997) Sizing of bubbles by incoherent imaging: defocus bias. Exp Fluids 23:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke J, Hess C, Kebbel V (2002) Digital holography for whole field spray diagnostics. In: 11th international symposium on application of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  6. Clift R, Grace J, Weber M (1978) Bubbles, drops and particles. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Damaschke N, Nobach H, Nonn T, Semidetnov N, Tropea C (2002a) Size and velocity measurements with the global phase Doppler technique. In: 11th international symposium on application of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  8. Damaschke N, Nobach H, Tropea C (2002b) Optical limits of particle concentration for multi-dimensional particle sizing techniques in fluid mechanics. Exp Fluids 32:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dantec Dynamics (2003) Flowmap particle sizer. Dantec Dynamics Newsletter 10(7)Google Scholar
  10. Datta RL, Napier D, Newitt D (1950) Trans Inst Chem Eng 28:14–26Google Scholar
  11. Davies R, Taylor SG (1950) Proc Roy Soc, Ser 200:375–390Google Scholar
  12. Glover A, Skippon S, Boyle R (1995) Interferometric laser imaging for droplet sizing: a method for droplet-size measurement in sparse spray systems. Appl Opt 34:8409–8421Google Scholar
  13. Hess CF (1998) Planar particle image analyzer. In: 9th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  14. van de Hulst H (1957) Light scattering by small particles. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. van de Hulst H, Wang R (1991) Glare points. Appl Opt 30(33):4755–4763Google Scholar
  16. Koenig G, Anders K, Frohn A (1986) A new light-scattering technique to measure the diameter of periodically generated moving droplets. J Aerosol Sci 17:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maeda M, Akasaka Y, Kawaguchi T (2002) Improvements of the interferometric technique for simultaneous measurement of droplet size and velocity vector field and its application to a transient spray. Exp Fluids 33:125–134Google Scholar
  18. Marxen M, Sullivan PE, Loewen MR, Jaehne B (2000) Comparison of Gaussian particle center estimators and the achievable measurement density for particle tracking velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Min SL, Gomez A (1996) High-resolution size measurement of single spherical particles with a fast Fourier transform of the angular scattering intensity. Appl Opt 35(24):4919–4926Google Scholar
  20. Niwa Y, Kamiya Y, Kawaguchi T, Maeda M (2000) Bubble sizing by interferometric laser imaging. In: 10th international symposium on application of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramuzat A (2002) Techniques de mesures non-invasives appliquees aux ecoulements biologiques: Etude des bifurcations pulmonaire succesives. PhD thesis, Universite Paris XIIGoogle Scholar
  22. Semidetnov N, Tropea C (2004) Conversion relationships for multidimensional particle sizing techniques. Meas Sci Technol 15:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Theunissen R (2003) Improvements in hybrid PIV/PTV algorithms and droplet sizing. Master’s thesis, Technische Universiteit DelftGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Dehaeck
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. P. A. J. van Beeck
    • 1
  • M. L. Riethmuller
    • 1
  1. 1.Von Karman Institute for Fluid DynamicsSint-Genesius-RodeBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion MechanicsGhent UniversityGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations