Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 257–266

S-PIV comparative assessment: image dewarping+misalignment correction and pinhole+geometric back projection

Originals

Abstract

This study describes the comparative analysis of two stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (S-PIV) techniques. Emphasis is given to the accuracy of the calibration procedure. Both techniques are related to the angular displacement concept. The first method is based on the pinhole model and is taken as a reference. The second method is based on two steps: the cross-correlation of a calibration pattern to obtain the image’s dewarping function; and the cross-correlation of experimental images to evaluate and correct for the misalignment between the calibration and measurement planes. The methods’ accuracy is compared on the basis of experimental data from a translation–rotation stage, which allows to simulate uniform displacements and misalignments in terms of offset and rotation. The simulation shows that the measurement accuracy is highly sensitive to relative misalignment between the target and measurement planes. A misalignment correction procedure taking into account the residual disparity between the dewarped images is proposed, compensating for most of the error with an overall less sensitive method to the misalignment.

References

  1. Calluaud D (2003) Développement d’une méthode de mesures tridimensionnelles par P.I.V. stéréoscopique. Application à l’étude de l‘écoulement naissant et établi autour d’un parallélépipède. PhD thesis, University of Poitiers, FranceGoogle Scholar
  2. Calluaud D, David L (2004) 3D PIV measurements of the flow around a surface-mounted block. Exp Fluids 36:53–61Google Scholar
  3. Coudert S, Schon JP (2001) Back-projection algorithm with misalignment corrections for 2D3C stereoscopic PIV. Meas Sci Technol 12:1371–1381 Google Scholar
  4. Fei R, Merzkirch W (2004) Investigations of the measurement accuracy of stereo particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 37:559–565Google Scholar
  5. Gautier G, Riethmuller M (1988) Application of PIDV to complex flows: measurement of the third component. VKI Lecture Series 1988-06Google Scholar
  6. Lindken R, Merzkirch W (2000) A method of reconstruction of three-dimensional velocity in an angular stereoscopic PIV system. In: Proceedings of the Euromech 411 Colloquium, Rouen, France, May 2000Google Scholar
  7. Prasad A (2000) Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29:103–116Google Scholar
  8. Prasad A, Jensen K (1995) Scheimpflug stereocamera for particle image velocimetry in liquid flows. Appl Opt 34:7092–7099Google Scholar
  9. Raffel M, Willert C, Kompenhans J (eds) (1998) Particle image velocimetry—a practical guide. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Scarano F, Riethmuller M (2000) Advances in iterative multigrid PIV image processing. Exp Fluids 29:S51–S60Google Scholar
  11. Scarano F, David L, Bsibsi M, Calluaud D, Akkermans R (2004) Comparison of two S-PIV techniques: pinhole model vs image dewarping and misalignment correction. In: Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on the application of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, July 2004Google Scholar
  12. Soloff S, Adrian R, Liu Z (1997) Distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8:1441–1454Google Scholar
  13. van Doorne C (2004) Stereoscopic PIV on transition in pipe flow. PhD thesis, Delft University Press, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Wieneke B (2003) Stereo-PIV using self-calibration on particle images. In: Proceedings of the 5h international symposium on PIV, Busan, Korea, September 2003Google Scholar
  15. Wieneke B (2004) Application of self-calibration stereo PIV in enclosed measurement volumes. In: Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on the application of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, July 2004Google Scholar
  16. Willert C (1997) Stereoscopic digital particle image velocimetry for application in wind tunnel flows. Meas Sci Technol 8:1465–1479Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Etudes AérodynamiquesUniversité de PoitiersFuturoscope CédexFrance

Personalised recommendations