Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 364–374

Flow characteristics of spray impingement in PFI injection systems

Originals

Abstract

The present paper addresses an experimental study of the dynamic exchanges between the impact of an intermittent spray and the liquid film formed over the target, based on detailed phase Doppler anemometry (PDA) measurements of droplet size, velocity and volume flux in the vicinity of the impact. The flow configuration is that of a pulsed injector spraying gasoline onto a flat disc to simulate the port fuel injection (PFI) of an internal combustion engine operating at cold-start conditions. The measurements evidence that the outcome of impact cannot be accurately predicted based on the characteristics of the free spray, but requires precise knowledge of the flow structure, induced by the target. The implications for spray–wall interaction modelling are then discussed based on the application of conservation equations to the mass, momentum and energy exchanged between the impinging droplets and the liquid film. The results show that the liquid film starts to form in the vicinity of the stagnation region at early stages of injection and a non-negligible proportion of droplets impinging at outer regions splash after interaction with the film. Film disruption is mainly driven by the intermittent axial momentum of impinging droplets, which enhances the vertical oscillations. The radial momentum imparted to the liquid film at the stagnation region is fed back onto secondary droplets emerging later during the injection cycle at outwards locations, where momentum of impacting droplets is much smaller. As a consequence, although the number of splashed droplets is enhanced by normal momentum, their size and ejection velocity depends more on the radial spread induced onto the liquid film and, hence, on the radial momentum at impact. The analysis further shows that existing spray–wall interaction models can be improved if the dynamic exchanges between the impacting spray and the liquid film are accounted.

References

  1. Abo-Serie E, Gavaises M, Arcoumanis C (2003) Spray/wall interaction in direct injection spark ignition equipped with multi-hole injectors. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on liquid atom and spray systems (ICLASS), Sorrento, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcoumanis C, Whitelaw DS, Whitelaw JH (1997) Gasoline injection against surfaces and films. Atomization Spray 7:437–456Google Scholar
  3. Bai C, Rusche H, Gosman AD (2002) Modeling of gasoline spray impingement. Atomization Spray 12:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes HA, Hardalupas Y, Taylor AMKP (1999) An investigation of interaction between two adjacent impinging droplets. Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on atomization and spray systems, Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  5. Cossali GE, Coghe A, Marengo M (1997) The impact of a single drop on a wetted surface. Exp Fluids 22:463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cossali GE, Marengo M, Santini M (2003) Multiple drop impact on heated surface. Proceedings of the 9th international conference liquid atom and spray systems (ICLASS), Sorrento, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  7. Cossali GE, Marengo M, Santini M (2004) Impact of single and multiple drop array on liquid film. Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on liquid atomization and spray systems (ILASS), Nottingham, UK, 6–8 September, pp 493–500Google Scholar
  8. Hardalupas Y, Okamoto S, Taylor AMKP, Whitelaw JH (1992) Application of a phase Doppler anemometer to a spray impinging on a disc. In: Adrian, Durão, Durst, Heitor, Maeda (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 490–506Google Scholar
  9. Lindgren R, Denbratt I (2000) Modelling gasoline spray–wall interaction—a review of current models. SAE Technical Paper 2000–01, p 2808Google Scholar
  10. Mundo C, Sommerfeld M, Tropea C (1995) Droplet–wall collisions: experimental studies of the deformation and breakup process. Int J Multiphas Flow 21:81–173Google Scholar
  11. Mundo C, Sommerfeld M, Tropea C (1998) On the modelling of liquid sprays impinging on surfaces. Atomization Spray 8:625–652Google Scholar
  12. Özdemir IB, Whitelaw JH (1993) Impingement of an unsteady two-phase jet on unheated and heated flat plates. J Fluid Mech 252:499–523Google Scholar
  13. Panão MR, Moreira ALN (2002) Visualization and analysis of spray impingement under cross-flow conditions. SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2664Google Scholar
  14. Panão MRO, Moreira ALN (2004) Experimental study of the flow regimes resulting from the impact of an intermittent gasoline spray. Exp Fluids 37:834–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Richter B, Dullenkopf K (2004) Investigation of secondary droplet characteristics produced during wall impact. Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on application of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  16. Roisman IV, Tropea C (2001) Flux measurements in sprays using phase Doppler techniques. Atomization Spray 11:667–700Google Scholar
  17. Roisman IV, Tropea C (2002) Flow on a wall surface due to spray impact. Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on liquid atom and spray systems, ZaragozaGoogle Scholar
  18. Roisman IV, Tropea C (2005) Fluctuating flow in a liquid layer and secondary spray created by an impacting spray. Int J Multiphas Flow 21:179–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roisman IV, Araneo L, Marengo M, Tropea C (1999) Evaluation of drop impingement models: experimental and numerical analysis of a spray impact. Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on atomization and spray systems, Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  20. Roisman IV, Prunet-Foch B, Tropea C, Vignes-Adler M (2002) Multiple drop impact on dry solid substract. J Colloid Interface Sci 256:396–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saffman M (1987) Automatic calibration of LDA measurement volume size. Appl Opt 26:2592–2597Google Scholar
  22. Sivakumar D, Tropea C (2002) Splashing impact of a spray onto a liquid film. Phys Fluids 14:L85–L88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Su K, Yao SC (1999) Numerical studies of sprays impacting normally on an infinite plate. Atomization Spray 9:431–444Google Scholar
  24. Tate RW (1982) Some problems associated with the accurate representation of droplet size distributions. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on liquid atom and spray systems, Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Tropea C, Roisman IV (2000) Modeling of spray impact on solid surfaces. Atomization Spray 10:387–408Google Scholar
  26. Wang A-B, Chen C-C, Hwang W-C (2002) On some new aspects of splashing impact of drop–liquid surface interactions. In: Rein M (ed) Drop–surface interactions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentInstituto Superior TécnicoLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations