Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 492–497 | Cite as

Simultaneous measurement of size and velocity of microbubbles moving in an opaque tube using an X-ray particle tracking velocimetry technique

Research Article

Abstract

An X-ray particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) technique was developed to simultaneously measure the sizes and velocities of microbubbles in a fluid without optical aberration. This technique is based on a combination of in-line X-ray holography and PTV. The X-ray PTV technique uses a configuration similar to that of conventional optical imaging techniques, and is easy to implement. In the present work, microbubbles generated from a fine wire by electrical heating were used as tracer particles. The X-ray PTV technique simultaneously recorded size and velocity data for microbubbles (φb=10–60 μm) moving upward in an opaque tube (inner diameter φ=2.7 mm). Due to the different refractive indices of water and air, phase contrast X-ray images clearly show the exact size and shape of overlapped microbubbles. In all of the working fluids tested (deionised water and 0.01 M and 0.10 M NaCl solutions), the measured terminal velocity of the microbubbles rising through the solution was proportional to the square of the bubble diameter. The proposed technique can be used to extract useful information on the behaviour of various bio/microscale fluid flows that are not amenable to analysis using conventional methods.

Keywords

X-ray PTV Microbubble Opaque material Size In-line holography 

References

  1. Adrian RJ (1991) Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:261–304Google Scholar
  2. Baek SJ, Lee SJ (1996) A new two-frame particle tracking algorithm using match probability. Exp Fluids 22:23–32Google Scholar
  3. Brenn G, Braeske H, Durst F (1961) Investigation of the unsteady two-phase flow with small bubbles in a model bubble column using phase-Doppler anemometry. Chem Eng Sci 57:5143–5159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clift R, Grace JR, Webber ME (1978) Bubbles, drops, and particles. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Deng P, Lee YK, Cheng P (2003) The growth and collapse of a micro-bubble under pulse heating. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 46:4041–4050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodge LG (1984) Calibration of the Malvern particle sizer. Appl Opt 23:2415Google Scholar
  7. Frumkin A, Levich VG (1947) On surfactants and interfacial motion. Zh Fiz Khim (Russian J Phys Chem) 21:1183–1204Google Scholar
  8. Hassan YA, Ortiz-Villafuerte J, Schmidl WD (2001) Three-dimensional measurements of single bubble dynamics in a small diameter pipe using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Int J Multiphase Flow 27:817–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hwu Y, Hsieh HH, Lu MJ, Tsai WL, Lin HM, Goh WC, Lai B, Je JH, Kim CK, Noh DY, Youn HS, Tromba G, Margaritondo G (1999) Coherence-enhanced synchrotron radiology: refraction versus diffraction mechanisms. J Appl Phys 86:4613–4618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kevin W, Skyba DM, Firschke C (1997) Interactions between micro-bubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1081–1088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim HB, Lee SJ (2002) Performance improvement of two-frame PTV using a hybrid adaptive scheme. Meas Sci Technol 13:573–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leavers VF (1992) Shape detection in computer vision using the Hough transform. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee SJ, Kim GB (2003) X-ray particle image velocimetry for measuring quantitative flow information inside opaque objects. J Appl Phys 94:3620–3623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Levich VG (1962) Physicochemical hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Maeda M, Kawaguchi T, Hishida K (2000) Novel interferometric measurement of size and velocity distributions of spherical particles in fluid flows. Meas Sci Technol 11:L13–L18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore R (1999) Optimal edge-based shape detection. Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  17. Pal S, Deutsch S, Merkle CL (1989) A comparison of shear stress fluctuation statistics between microbubble modified and polymer modified turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids 1(8):1360–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Seeger A, Affeld K, Goubergrits L, Kertzscher U, Wellnhofer E (2001) X-ray-based assessment of the three-dimensional velocity of the liquid phase in a bubble column. Exp Fluids 31:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Snigirev A, Snigireva I, Kohn V, Kuznetsov S, Schelokov I (1995) On the possibilities of X-ray phase contrast microimaging by coherent high-energy synchrotron radiation. Rev Sci Instrum 66:5486–5492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Veltman J, Goossen T, Laguna P, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette J (2002) New technical improvements for TRUS in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur Urol Suppl 1:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPohang University of Science and TechnologyPohangKorea

Personalised recommendations