Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 170–191 | Cite as

Main results of the Second International PIV Challenge

  • M. Stanislas
  • K. Okamoto
  • C. J. Kähler
  • J. Westerweel
Originals special issue

Abstract

This paper presents the main results of the Second International PIV Challenge which took place in Busan (Korea) on the 19th and 20th of September 2003. This workshop was linked to the PIV03 International Symposium, which was held at the same place the following week. The present contribution gives the objectives of the Challenge, describes the test cases and the algorithms used by the participants, and presents the main results together with some discussion and conclusions on the accuracy and robustness of various PIV and PTV algorithms. As all the results obtained cannot be detailed, this contribution should serve as a guide for the use of the full database of images and results which is available at http://www.pivchallenge.org.

Keywords

PIV PTV PIV algorithms Accuracy Spatial resolution 

References

  1. Cardone G, Nese FG, Astarita T, Carlomagno GM (2002) Experimental investigation of a round jet in cross-flow. In: 10th international symposium on flow visualization, Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  2. Di Florio D, Di Felice F, Romano GP (2002) Windowing, re-shaping and re-orientation interrogation windows in particle image velocimetry for the investigation of shear flows. Meas Sci Technol 13:953–962Google Scholar
  3. Foucaut JM, Miliat B, Perenne N, Stanislas M (2004) Characterization of different PIV algorithms using the EUROPIV synthetic image generator and real images from a turbulent boundary layer. In: Stanislas M, Westerweel J, Kompenhans J (eds) Proceedings of the EUROPIV 2 workshop held in Zaragoza, Spain, 31 March–1 April 2003, Springer-ISBN 3-540-21423-2, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Fukushima C, Aanen L, Westerweel J (2002) Investigation of the mixing process in an axisymmetric turbulent jet using PIV and LIF. In: Adrian RJ et al (eds) Laser techniques for fluid mechanics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 339–356Google Scholar
  5. Keane RD, Adrian RJ (1990) Optimisation of particle image velocimeters—part I: double pulsed systems measurement science and technology. 1:1202–1215Google Scholar
  6. Keane RD, Adrian RJ (1992) Theory of cross-correlation analysis of PIV images. Appl Sci Res 49:191–215Google Scholar
  7. Lecordier B, Trinité M (2004) Advanced PIV algorithms with image distortion for velocity measurements in turbulent flows. In: Stanislas M, Westerweel J, Kompenhans J (eds) Proceedings of the EUROPIV 2 workshop held in Zaragoza, Spain, 31 March –1 April 2003, Springer-ISBN 3-540-21423-2, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Nerger D, Kähler CJ, Radespiel R (2003) Zeitaufgelöste PIV Messungen an einem schwingenden SD7003-Profil bei Re=6×104. Lasermethoden in der Strömungsmesstechnik, 10. Fachtagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Laser-Anemometrie GALA e.V., BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  9. Ohmi K, Hang Yu L (2000) Particle tracking velocity with new algorithms. Meas Sci Technol 11:603–616Google Scholar
  10. Okamoto K, Nishio S, Kobayashi T, Saga T, Takehara K (2000a) Evaluation of the 3D-PIV Standard Images (PIV-STD Project). J Visualization 3(2):115–124Google Scholar
  11. Okamoto K, Nishio S, Saga T, Kobayashi T (2000b) Standard images for particle-image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 11:685–691Google Scholar
  12. Quénot GM, Pakleza J, Kowalewski TA (1998) Particle image velocimetry with optical flow. Exp Fluids 25(3):177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rajaratnam N (1976) Turbulent jets. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Scarano F (2002) Iterative image deformation methods in PIV. Meas Sci Technol 13:R1–R19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scarano F, Riethmuller M (2000) Advances in iterative multigrid PIV image processing. Exp Fluids Suppl 29:S51–S60Google Scholar
  16. Stanislas M, Okamoto K, Kaehler C (2003) Main results of the first international PIV Challenge. Meas Sci Technol 14:R63–R89Google Scholar
  17. Stitou A, Riethmuller ML (2001) Extension of PIV to super resolution using PTV. Meas Sci Technol 12(9):1398–1403Google Scholar
  18. Sugii Y, Nishio S, Okuno T, Okamoto K (2000) A highly accurate iterative PIV technique using gradient method. Meas Sci Technol 11:1666–1673Google Scholar
  19. Susset A, Most JM, Honoré D (2003) A novel architecture of super-resolution PIV algorithm for the improvement of large velocity gradient resolution. In: 5th international symposium on particle image velocimetry, Busan, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  20. Wereley ST, Gui LC (2002) Advanced algorithms for microscale particle image velocimetry. AIAA J 40(6)Google Scholar
  21. Westerweel J (1997) Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8:1379–1392Google Scholar
  22. Westerweel J (2000a) Theoretical analysis of the measurement precision in particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29:S3–S12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Westerweel J (2000b) Effect of sensor geometry on the performance of PIV interrogation. In: Adrian et al (eds) Laser techniques applied to fluid mechanics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 37–55Google Scholar
  24. Westerweel J, Draad AA, Van Der Hoeven JGTh, Van Oord J (1996) Measurement of fully developed turbulent pipe flow with digital particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 20:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Westerweel J, Dabiri D, Gharib M (1997) The effect of a discrete window offset on the accuracy of cross-correlation analysis of digital PIV recordings. Exp Fluids 23:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Willert C (2004) Application potential of advanced PIV algorithms for industrial applications. Pivnet/ERCOFTAC workshop on particle image velocimetry. Lisbon, Portugal, July 9–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Stanislas
    • 1
  • K. Okamoto
    • 2
  • C. J. Kähler
    • 3
  • J. Westerweel
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Mécanique de LilleUMR 8107Villeneuve d’Ascq CedexFrance
  2. 2.Department of Quantum Energy, Systems ScienceThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Institut für StrömungsmechanikBraunschweigGermany
  4. 4.Laboratory for Aero and HydrodynamicsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations