Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 695–699 | Cite as

Comment on the Clauser chart method for determining the friction velocity

Short Communication

Abstract

A known difficulty with using the Clauser chart method to determine the friction velocity in wall bounded flows is that it assumes, a priori, a logarithmic law for the mean velocity profile. Using both experimental and DNS data in the literature, this note explicitly shows how friction velocities obtained using the Clauser chart method can potentially mask subtle Reynolds-number-dependent behavior.

References

  1. Barenblatt GI, Chorin AJ (1998) Scaling of the intermediate region in wall-bounded turbulence: the power law. Phys Fluids 10:1043–1044Google Scholar
  2. Bradshaw P, Huang GP (1995) The law of the wall in turbulent flow. Proc R Soc Lond A 451:165–188Google Scholar
  3. Clauser FH (1956) The turbulent boundary layer. Adv Appl Mech 4:1–51Google Scholar
  4. Fernholz HH, Finley PJ (1996) The incompressible zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer: an assessment of the data. Prog Aerospace Sci 32:245–311Google Scholar
  5. George WK, Castillo L (1997) Zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer. Appl Mech Rev 50:689–729Google Scholar
  6. Moser RD, Kim J, Mansour NN (1999) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ=590. Phys Fluids 11:943–945Google Scholar
  7. Patel VC, Head MR (1969) Some observations on skin friction and velocity profiles in fully developed pipe and channel flow. J Fluid Mech 38:181–201Google Scholar
  8. Purtell LP, Klebanoff PS, Buckley FT (1981) Turbulent boundary layer at low Reynolds number. Phys Fluids 24:802–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Zagarola MV, Perry AE, Smits AJ (1997) Log laws or power laws: the scaling in the overlap region. Phys Fluids 9:2094–2100Google Scholar
  10. Zanoun E, Durst F, Nagib H (2003) Evaluating the law of the wall in two-dimensional fully developed turbulent channel flows. Phys Fluids 15:3079–3089Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Computational Sciences Department 9233Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations