Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 476–484 | Cite as

Particle-wall collision in shear thinning fluids

Originals

Abstract

The present study deals with the measurements of the impact wi and rebound wr velocities of steel particles in different fluids colliding with a rigid wall. The results are presented in terms of the coefficient of restitution e=wr/wi as a function of the Stokes number (ratio between the particle inertia and the viscous forces). We focus the attention on possible differences between rebounds that occur in Newtonian fluids and in non-Newtonian, shear thinning fluids. The measurements of wet coefficients of restitution in Newtonian fluid are in good agreement with the experimental data found by Gondret et al. (2002). In the range of Stokes number investigated, an increase of the coefficient of restitution with the shear thinning fluid is clearly observed with respect to the Newtonian data. Particular attention has been dedicated to techniques of image processing to perform an optimal estimation of the particle centroid in highly noisy images.

References

  1. Barbesta F, Bousfield DW, Rigdahl M (2001) Modeling of rheological properties of coating colors. J Rheol 45(1):139–160Google Scholar
  2. Barnocky G, Davis RH (1988) Elastohydrodynamic collision and rebound of spheres: experimental verification. Phys Fluids 31:1324–1329Google Scholar
  3. Becker LE, McKinley GH (1994) The unsteady motion of a sphere in a viscoelastic fluid. J Rheol 38(2):377–403Google Scholar
  4. Bot ETG, Hulsen MA, van den Brule BHAA (1998) The motion of two spheres falling along their line of centres in a Borger fluid. J Non-Newton Fluid 79:191–212Google Scholar
  5. Davis RH, Serayssol JM, Hinch EJ (1986) The elastohydrodynamic collision of two spheres. J Fluid Mech 163:479–497Google Scholar
  6. Davis RH, Rager DA, Good BT (2002) Elastohydrodynamic rebound of spheres from coated surfaces. J Fluid Mech 468:107–119Google Scholar
  7. Edali M, Esmail MN, Vatistas GH (2001) Rheological properties of high concentrations of carboxymethyl cellulose solutions. J Appl Polym Sci 79:1787–1801Google Scholar
  8. Escudier MP, Presti SS (1999) Drag reduction in the turbulent pipe flow of polymers. J Non-Newton Fluid 81:197–213Google Scholar
  9. Falcon E, Laroche C, Fauve S, Coste C (1998) Behavior of one inelastic ball bouncing repeatedly off the ground. Eur Phys J B 3:45–57Google Scholar
  10. Gondret P, Hallouin E, Lance M, Petit L (1999) Experiments on the motion of a solid sphere toward a wall: from viscous dissipation to elastohydrodynamic bouncing. Phys Fluids 11(9):2803–2805Google Scholar
  11. Gondret P, Lance M, Petit L (2002) Bouncing motion of spherical particles in fluids. Phys Fluids 14(2):643–652Google Scholar
  12. Gorham DA, Kharaz AH (2000) The measurement of particle rebound characteristics. Powder Technol 112:193–202Google Scholar
  13. Gorham DA, Kharaz AH (2001) An experimental study of the elastic rebound of spheres. Powder Technol 120:281–291Google Scholar
  14. Ghanam MT, Esmail MN (1997) Rheological properties of carboxymethyl cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 64:289–301Google Scholar
  15. Hunter SC (1957) Energy absorbed by elastic waves during impact. J Mech Phys Solids 5:162–171Google Scholar
  16. Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Joseph GG, Zenit JR, Hunt ML, Rosenwinkel AM (2001) Particle-wall collision in a viscous fluid. J Fluid Mech 433:329–346Google Scholar
  18. Kharaz AH, Gorham DA, Salman AD (1999) Accurate measurement of particle rebound impact parameters. Meas Sci Technol 10:31–35Google Scholar
  19. Khalitov DA, Longmire EK (2002) Simultaneous two-phase PIV by two-parameters phase discrimination. Exp Fluids 32:252–268Google Scholar
  20. Kokini JL, Surmay K (1994) Steady shear viscosity first normal stress difference and recoverable strain in carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium alginare and guar gum. Carbohydr Polym 23:27–33Google Scholar
  21. Labous L, Rosato AD, Dave RN (1997) Measurements of collisional properties of spheres using high-speed video analysis. Phys Rev E 56(5):5717–5725Google Scholar
  22. Lundberg J, Shen HH (1992) Collisional restitution dependence on viscosity. J Eng Mech-ASCE 118(5):979–989Google Scholar
  23. Mena B, Manero O, Leal LG (1987) The influence of rheological properties on the slow flow past spheres. J Non-Newton Fluid 26:247–275Google Scholar
  24. Navez V, Walters K (1996) A note on settling in shear-thinning polymer solutions. J Non-Newton Fluid 67:325–334Google Scholar
  25. Raffel M, Willert C, Kompenhans J (1998) Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Sondergaard R, Chaney K, Brennen CE (1990) Measurements of solid spheres bouncing off flat plates. J Appl Mech-T ASME 57:694–699Google Scholar
  27. Zener C (1941) The intrinsic inelasticity of large plates. Phys Rev 59:669–673Google Scholar
  28. Zenit JR, Hunt ML (1998) The impulsive motion of a liquid resulting from a particle collision. J Fluid Mech 375:345–361Google Scholar
  29. Zenit JR, Hunt ML (1999) Mechanics of immersed particle collisions. J Fluid Eng-T ASME 121:179–184Google Scholar
  30. Williamson BP, Waletrs K, Bates TW, Coy RC, Milton AL (1997) The viscoelastic property of multigrade oils and their effect on journal bearing characteristics. J Non-Newton Fluid 73:115–126Google Scholar
  31. Windle W, Beazley KM (1997) The role of viscoelasticity in blade coatings. Tappi J 51:340–348Google Scholar
  32. Young SL, Shoemaker CF (2001) Measurements of shear-dependent intrinsic viscosities of carboxymethyl cellulose and xanthan gum suspensions. J Appl Polym Sci 42:2405–2408Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria AmbientaleUniversità di GenovaGenovaItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Hydromechanics and Water Resources ManagementETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations