Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 438–454 | Cite as

Quantitative visualization of compressible turbulent shear flows using condensate-enhanced Rayleigh scattering

  • J. Poggie
  • P. J. Erbland
  • A. J. Smits
  • R. B. Miles
Review Article


This paper describes several flow visualization experiments carried out in Mach 3 and Mach 8 turbulent shear flows. The experimental technique was based on laser scattering from particles of H2O or CO2 condensate that form in the wind tunnel nozzle expansion process. The condensate particles vaporize extremely rapidly on entering the relatively hot fluid within a turbulent structure, so that a sharp vaporization interface marks the outer edge of the rotational shear layer fluid. Calculations indicate that the observed thin interface corresponds to a particle size of 10 nm or less, which is consistent with optical measurements, and that particles of this size track the fluid motions well. Further, calculations and experiments show that the freestream concentration of condensate required for flow visualization has only a small effect on the wind tunnel pressure distribution. Statistics based on the image data were compared to corresponding results from probe measurements and agreement was obtained in statistical measures of speed, scale, and orientation of the large-scale structures in the shear layer turbulence. The condensate-enhanced Rayleigh scattering technique is judged to be a useful tool for quantitative studies of shear layer structure, particularly for identifying the instantaneous boundary layer edge and for extracting comparative information on the large-scale structures represented there.


  1. Abraham FF (1974) Homogeneous nucleation theory: the pretransition theory of vapour condensation. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Baca BK (1981) An experimental study of the reattachment of a free shear layer in compressible turbulent flow. Masters thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumgartner ML (1997) Turbulence structure in a hypersonic boundary layer. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, June 1997Google Scholar
  4. Bogdanoff DW (1983) Compressibility effects in turbulent free shear layers. AIAA J 210(6):0 926–927Google Scholar
  5. Bogdonoff SM (1951) The design, construction, and operation of the Princeton 4 by 8 inch variable-density wind tunnel. Technical Report 34, Project Squid, Princeton UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Cogne S, Forkey J, Lempert W, Miles RB, Smits AJ (1993) The evolution of large-scale structures in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. In: Proceedings of the ASME fluids engineering conference, Washington, June 2003, Kral LD, Zang TA (eds) Transitional and turbulent compressible flows, vol 151, pp 229–237Google Scholar
  7. Corrsin S, Kistler AL (1954) Free-stream boundaries of turbulent flows. National Advisory Council on Aeronautics (NACA) technical report TR 1244Google Scholar
  8. Elliott GS, Samimy M, Arnette SA (1995) The characteristics and evolution of large-scale structures in compressible mixing layers. Phys Fluids 7(4):864–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erbland PJ (2000) Development and application of carbon dioxide enhanced filtered Rayleigh scattering for high speed low density flows. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, November 2000Google Scholar
  10. Falco RE (1977) Coherent motions in the outer region of turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids, part II 20(10):S124–S132Google Scholar
  11. Forkey J (1996) Development and demonstration of filtered Rayleigh scattering—a laser based flow diagnostic for planar measurement of velocity, temperature and pressure. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, June 1996Google Scholar
  12. Hayakawa K, Smits AJ, Bogdonoff SM (1984) Turbulence measurements in a compressible reattaching shear layer. AIAA J 22(7):889–895Google Scholar
  13. Horstman CC, Settles GS, Williams DR, Bogdonoff SM (1982) A reattaching free shear layer in compressible turbulent flow. AIAA J 20(1):79–85Google Scholar
  14. Kanury A (1975) Introduction to combustion phenomena. Gordon and Breach, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Murray RC (1999) A study of the shear layer over a two-dimensional cavity using correlation techniques. Masters thesis, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, May 1999Google Scholar
  16. Nau T (1995) Rayleigh scattering as a quantitative tool in compressible turbulent boundary layers. Masters thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, May 1995Google Scholar
  17. Papamoschou D (1991) Structure of the compressible turbulent shear layer. AIAA J 29(5):680–681Google Scholar
  18. Poggie J (1991) Quantitative flow visualization applied to the study of compressible turbulent flow. Masters thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, June 1991Google Scholar
  19. Poggie J, Smits AJ (2001) Shock unsteadiness in a reattaching shear layer. J Fluid Mech 429:155–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Poggie J, Smits AJ (2003) Large-scale structures in a compressible mixing layer over a cavity. AIAA J 41(12):2410–2419Google Scholar
  21. Robinson SK (1991) Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:601–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Samimy M, Lele SK (1991) Motion of particles with inertia in a compressible free shear layer. Phys Fluids A–Fluid 3(8):1915–1923Google Scholar
  23. Selig MS, Andreopoulos J, Muck KC, Dussauge JP, Smits AJ (1989) Turbulence structure in a shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J 27(7):862–869Google Scholar
  24. Settles GS (1975) An experimental study of compressible turbulent boundary layer separation at high Reynolds number. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  25. Settles GS (2001) Aerospace and wind tunnel testing. In: Yang WJ (ed) Handbook of flow visualization, 2nd edn, chap 25, pp 395–408. Taylor and Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Settles GS, Baca BK, Williams DR, Bogdonoff SM (1982) Reattachment of a compressible turbulent free shear layer. AIAA J 20:60–67Google Scholar
  27. Shau YR, Dolling DS, Choi KY (1993) Organized structure in a compressible turbulent shear layer. AIAA J 31(8):1398–1405Google Scholar
  28. Shen ZH, Smith DR, Smits AJ (1993) Wall pressure fluctuations in the reattachment region of a supersonic free shear layer. Exp Fluids 14:10–16Google Scholar
  29. Shirinzadeh B, Hillard ME, Exton RJ (1991) Condensation effects on Rayleigh scattering measurements in a supersonic wind tunnel. AIAA J 29(2):242–246Google Scholar
  30. Smith DR, Poggie J, Konrad W, Smits AJ (1991) Visualization of the structure of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions using Rayleigh scattering. In: Proceedings of the 29th aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 1991. AIAA paper 91–0651, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith DR, Smits AJ (1993) Simultaneous measurement of velocity and temperature fluctuations in the boundary layer of a supersonic flow. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 7:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith MW, Smits AJ, Miles RB (1989) Compressible boundary-layer density cross sections by UV Rayleigh scattering. Opt Lett 14(17):916–918Google Scholar
  33. Smith MW, Smits AJ (1995) Visualization of the structure of supersonic turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids 18:288–302Google Scholar
  34. Smits AJ, Dussauge J-P (1996) Turbulent shear layers in supersonic flow. AIP Press, Woodbury, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Smits AJ, Hayakawa K, Muck KC (1983) Constant temperature hot-wire anemometry practice in supersonic flows, part 1: the normal wire. Exp Fluids 1:83–92Google Scholar
  36. Spina EF (1988) Organized structures in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, October 1988Google Scholar
  37. Spina EF, Donovan JF, Smits AJ (1991a) Convection velocity in supersonic turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids A–Fluid 3(12):3124–3126Google Scholar
  38. Spina EF, Donovan JF, Smits AJ (1991b) On the structure of high-Reynolds-number supersonic turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 222:293–327Google Scholar
  39. Spina EF, Smits AJ (1987) Organized structures in a compressible turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 182:85–109Google Scholar
  40. Spina EF, Smits AJ, Robinson SK (1994) The physics of supersonic turbulent boundary layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 26:287–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vas IE, Bogdonoff SM (1971) A preliminary report on the Princeton University high Reynolds number 8 in×8 in supersonic tunnel. Internal Memorandum 39, Gas Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  42. Wegener PP, Clumpner JA, Wu BJC (1972) Homogeneous nucleation and growth of ethanol drops in supersonic flow. Phys Fluids 15(11):1869–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Poggie
    • 1
  • P. J. Erbland
    • 1
  • A. J. Smits
    • 2
  • R. B. Miles
    • 2
  1. 1.Aeronautical Sciences Division, Air Vehicles DirectorateAir Force Research LaboratoryWright-Patterson AFBUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations