Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 219–229 | Cite as

Turbulent drag reduction in dam-break flows

  • Imre M. Jánosi
  • Dominique Jan
  • K. Gábor Szabó
  • Tamás Tél
Original

Abstract

The role of turbulence is investigated in dam-break flows, where a finite volume of fluid is released from a compartment into a long, rectangular channel. After a sudden removal of the lock gate, a gravity current, undular bore, or solitary wave develops, depending on the ambient fluid height in the channel. The temporal evolution of the moving front has been measured and evaluated. It was observed that the dilution using a very small amount (a few weight ppm) of a long chain polymer (polyethylene-oxide) in the fluid strongly affected flow properties. Pronounced drag reduction has been found in dry bed flows (whereas the polymer increased the viscosity of the fluid). The presence of a few mm-thick ambient fluid layer in the channel effectively destroyed drag reduction, in spite of the fact that strong turbulence was obvious and the propagation velocity of the front was almost unchanged.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Hungarian Science Foundation (OTKA) under Grant Nos. T032423, T032437, and TS044839. The authors are thankful to Gyözö Láng for his assistance in physical-chemical measurements.

References

  1. Benzi R, Ching ESC, Horesh N, Procaccia I (2004) Theory of concentration dependence in drag reduction by polymers and of the maximum drag reduction asymptote. Phys Rev Lett 92.078302Google Scholar
  2. Berman NS (1978) Drag reduction by polymers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 10:47–64Google Scholar
  3. Boffetta G, Celani A, Musacchio S (2003a) Two-dimensional turbulence of dilute polymer solutions. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.034501Google Scholar
  4. Boffetta G, Celani A, Mazzino A (2003b) Onset and universality of drag reduction in turbulent Kolmogorov flow. lanl.arXiv.org:nlin-0309036Google Scholar
  5. Brannan DA, Esplen M, Gray J (1999) Geometry. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Bushnell DM (1991) Drag reduction in nature. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cadot O, Bonn D, Douady S (1998) Turbulent drag reduction in a closed flow system: Boundary layer vs bulk effects. Phys Fluids 10:426–436Google Scholar
  8. Clever RM, Busse FH (1992) Three-dimensional convection in a horizontal fluid layer subjected to a constant shear. J Fluid Mech 234:511–527Google Scholar
  9. Clever RM, Busse FH (1997) Tertiary and quaternary solutions for plane Couette flow. J Fluid Mech 344:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Angelis E, Casciola CM, L’vov VS, Piva R (2003) Drag reduction by polymers in turbulent channel flows: Energy redistribution between invariant empirical modes. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.056312Google Scholar
  11. Eckhardt B, Faisst H, Schmiegel A, Schumacher J (2002) Turbulence transition in shear flows. In: Castro IP, Hancock PE, Thomas TG (eds) Advances in Turbulence IX, proceedings of the 9th European turbulence conference, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain, 2002, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  12. Gampert B, Wagner P (1985) The influence of molecular weight and molecular weight distribution on drag reduction and mechanical degradation in turbulent flow of highly dilute polymer solutions. In: Gampert D (ed) Proceedings of the IUTAM symposium on the influence of polymer additives on velocity and temperature fields, Essen, Germany, June 1984, pp 71–85Google Scholar
  13. Gröbelbauer HP, Fanneløp TK, Britter RE (1993) The propagation of intrusion fronts of high density ratios. J Fluid Mech 250:669–687Google Scholar
  14. Gyr A, Bewersdorff HW (1995) Drag reduction of turbulent flows by additives. Kluwer Academic Publ, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Housiadas KD, Beris AN (2003) Polymer-induced drag reduction: Effects of the variations in elasticity and inertia in turbulent viscoelastic channel flow. Phys Fluids 15:2369–2384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huppert HE (1982) The propagation of two dimensional and axisymmetric viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface. J Fluid Mech 121:43–58Google Scholar
  17. Klemp JB, Rotunno R, Skamarock WC (1997) On the propagation of internal bores. J Fluid Mech 331:81–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kondic L (2003) Instabilities in gravity driven flow of thin fluid films. SIAM Rev 45:95–113Google Scholar
  19. L’vov VS, Pomyalov A, Procaccia I, Tiberkevich V (2003) Drag reduction by polymers in wall bounded turbulence. lanl.arXiv.org:nlin-0307034Google Scholar
  20. Lumley JL (1969) Drag reduction by additives. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1:367–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Min T, Yoo JY, Choi H, Joseph DD (2003a) Drag reduction by polymer additives in a turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 486:213–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Min T, Choi H, Yoo JY (2003b) Maximum drag reduction in a turbulent channel flow by polymer additives. J Fluid Mech 492:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nagata M (1990) Three-dimensional finite-amplitude solutions in plane Couette flow: Bifurcation from infinity. J Fluid Mech 217:519–527Google Scholar
  24. Paireau O, Bonn D (1999) Drag reduction in liquid-liquid friction. Phys Rev Lett 83:5591–5594Google Scholar
  25. Ptasinski PK, Boersma BJ, Nieuwstadt FTM, Hulsen MA, Van den Brule BHAA, Hunt JCR (2003) Turbulent channel flow near maximum drag reduction: simulations, experiments and mechanisms. J Fluid Mech 490:251–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ritter A (1892) Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure 36:947–954Google Scholar
  27. Schmiegel A, Eckhardt B (1997) Fractal stability border in plane Couette flow. Phys Rev Lett 79:5250–5253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmiegel A, Eckhardt B (2000) Persistent turbulence in annealed plane Couette flow. Europhys Lett 51:395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simpson JE (1997) Gravity currents: In the environment and laboratory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Sreenivasan KR, White CM (2000) The onset of drag reduction by dilute polymer additives, and the maximum drag reduction asymptote. J Fluid Mech 409:149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stansby PK, Chegini A, Barnes TCD (1998) The initial stages of dam-break flow. J Fluid Mech 374:407–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stone PA, Waleffe F, Graham MD (2002) Toward a structural understanding of turbulent drag reduction: Nonlinear coherent states in viscoelastic shear flows. Phys Rev Lett 89:208301–1-4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stone PA, Graham MD (2003) Polymer dynamics in a model of the turbulent buffer layer. Phys Fluids 15:1247–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sturm TW (2001) Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Toms BA (1949) Observation on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers. In: Proceedings of the international rheological congress, Amsterdam, North Holland, II-135–141Google Scholar
  36. Virk PS (1975) Drag reduction fundamentals. AIChE J 21:625–656Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imre M. Jánosi
    • 1
  • Dominique Jan
    • 1
  • K. Gábor Szabó
    • 2
  • Tamás Tél
    • 1
  1. 1.von Kármán Laboratory for Environmental FlowsEötvös UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.HAS Research Group, Institute for Theoretical PhysicsEötvös UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations