Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 105–119

Optically sliced micro-PIV using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)

  • Jae Sung Park
  • Chang Kyoung Choi
  • Kenneth D. Kihm
Original

Abstract

Optically sliced microscopic-particle image velocimetry (micro-PIV) is developed using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The developed PIV system shows a unique optical slicing capability allowing true depth-wise resolved micro-PIV vector field mapping. A comparative study between CLSM micro-PIV and conventional epi-fluorescence micro-PIV is presented. Both techniques have been applied to the creeping Poiseuille flows in two different microtubes of 99-μm (Re=0.00275) and 516-μm ID diameters (Re=0.021), which are respectively imaged by a 40×-0.75NA objective with an estimated 2.8-μm optical slice thickness, and by a 10×-0.30NA objective with a 26.7-μm slicing. Compared to conventional micro-PIV, CLSM micro-PIV consistently shows significantly improved particle image contrasts, definitions, and measured flow vector fields agreeing more accurately with predictions based on the Poiseuille flow fields. The data improvement due to the optical slicing of CLSM micro-PIV is more pronounced with higher magnification imaging with higher NA objectives for a smaller microtube.

References

  1. Born M, Wolf E (1999) Principles of optics, 7th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 491Google Scholar
  2. Conchello JA, Lichtman JW (1994) Theoretical analysis of a rotating-disk partially confocal scanning microscope. Appl Opt 33:585–596Google Scholar
  3. Diaspro A (ed) (2002) Confocal and two-photon microscopy: Foundations, application, and advances. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 101–125, 245–247Google Scholar
  4. Egner A, Andersen V, Hell SW (2002) Comparison of the axial resolution of practical Nipkow-disk confocal fluorescence microscopy with that of multifocal multiphoton microscopy: Theory and experiment. J Microsc 206:24–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hecht E (2002) Optics, 4th edn. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 467–471Google Scholar
  6. Hell S, Reiner G, Cremer C, Stelzer EHK (1993) Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index. J Microsc 169:391–405Google Scholar
  7. Ichihara A, Tanaami T, Isozaki K, Sugiyama Y, Kosugi Y, Mikuriya K, Abe M, Uemura I (1996) High-speed confocal fluorescence microscopy using a Nipkow scanner with microlenses for 3-D imaging of single fluorescent molecule in real time. Bioimaging 4:57–62Google Scholar
  8. Kimura S, Munakata C (1990) Depth resolution of the fluorescent confocal scanning optical microscope. Appl Opt 29:489–494Google Scholar
  9. Lew HS, Fung YC (1970) Entry flow into blood vessels at arbitrary Reynolds number. J Biomech 3:23–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Meinhart CD, Wereley ST, Gray MHB (2000) Volume illumination for two-dimensional particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 11:809–814Google Scholar
  11. Merzkirch W (1987) Flow visualization, 2nd edn. Academic Press, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  12. Minsky M (1998) Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope. Scanning 10:128–138Google Scholar
  13. Olsen MG, Adrian RJ (2000) Out-of-focus effects on particle image visibility and correlation in microscopic particle image Velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29:S166-S174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prenel JP, Bailly Y (1998) Theoretical determination of light distributions in various laser light sheets for flow visualization. J Flow Vis Image Proc 5:211–224Google Scholar
  15. Qian H, Elson EL (1991) Analysis of confocal laser-microscope optics for 3-D fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Appl Opt 30:1185–1195Google Scholar
  16. Raffel M, Willert CE, Kompenhans J (1998) Particle image velocimetry: A practical guide. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Sandison DR, Webb WW (1994) Background rejection and signal-to-noise optimization in confocal and alternative fluorescence microscopes. Appl Opt 33:603–615Google Scholar
  18. Santiago JG, Wereley ST, Meinhart CD, Beebe DJ, Adrian RJ (1998) A particle image velocimetry system for microfluidics. Exp Fluids 25:316–319Google Scholar
  19. Sheppard CJR, Gu M (1991) Aberration compensation in confocal microscopy. Appl Opt 30:3563–3568Google Scholar
  20. Sugii Y, Nishio S, Okamoto K (2002) In vivo PIV measurement of red blood cell velocity field in microvessels considering mesentery motion. Physiol Meas 23:403–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Thiery L, Prenel JP, Porcar R (1996) Theoretical and experimental intensity analysis of laser sheets for flow visualization. Opt Commun 123:801–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tiziani HJ, Uhde HM (1994) Three-dimensional analysis by a microlens-array confocal arrangement. Appl Opt 33:567–572Google Scholar
  23. Webb RH (1996) Confocal optical microscopy. Rep Prog Phys 59:427–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilhelm S, Grobler B, Gluch M, Heinz H (2003) Confocal laser scanning microscopy: Principles. Carl Zeiss, pp 7–16Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jae Sung Park
    • 1
  • Chang Kyoung Choi
    • 1
  • Kenneth D. Kihm
    • 1
  1. 1.Micro/Nano-scale Fluidics and Heat Transport Laboratory, Department of Mechanical EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations