Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 460–466 | Cite as

Bluff body drag control by boundary layer disturbances

  • V. L. Zhdanov
  • H. D. Papenfuss
Article

Abstract

The experimental results are presented for the influence of thin plates and dimples arranged over the upper surface of a coach model on base pressure variations, turbulent wake characteristics, and body drag. The influence of the plate height, the plate spacing, the attack angle, and the distance from the plate trailing edge to the model base on pressure distributions over the model and its back panel are studied. It is shown that rather small disturbances of the boundary layer by plates cause the base pressure to increase up to 6% and model drag to decrease by as much as 3%. However, the effect of the dimples on the base pressure appears to be much less.

Keywords

Shear Layer Reynolds Stress Base Pressure Attack Angle Wake Vortex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to M. Zils for help in preparing and conducting experiments.

References

  1. Bull MK, Pickles JM (1992) the influence of a downstream body on wake formation behind a bluff body. In: Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on Bluff-Body Wakes, Dynamics and Instabilities, Goettingen, Germany, 7–11 September, pp 185–188Google Scholar
  2. Corke TC, Guezennec YG, Nagib HM (1981) Modification in drag of turbulent boundary layers resulting from manipulation of large-scale structures. NASA CR-3444Google Scholar
  3. Corke TC, Nagib HM, Guezennec Y (1982) A new view on origin, role and manipulation of large scales in turbulent boundary layers. NASA CR-165861Google Scholar
  4. Corke TC (1984) Digital image filtering in visualised boundary layers. AIAA J 22:1124–1131Google Scholar
  5. Chyu MK, Yu Y, Ding H, Downs JP, Soechting FO (1997) Concavity enhancement heat transfer in an internal cooling passage. ASME paper 97-GT-437Google Scholar
  6. Gai SL, Sharma SD (1985) Experiments on the reduction of base drag of a blunt trailing edge aerofoil in subsonic flow. Aeronaut J (GB) 85:206–210Google Scholar
  7. Gerard JH (1966) The mechanism of the formation region of vortices behind bluff bodies. J Fluid Mech 25:401–413Google Scholar
  8. Guezennec YG, Nagib HM (1985) Documentation of mechanisms leading to net drag reduction in manipulated boundary layers. In: Proc AIAA Shear Flow Control Conference, Boulder, Colorado, 12–14 March, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  9. Isaev SA, Leontiev AI, Baranov PA (2000) Identification of self-organized vortex-like structures in numerically simulated turbulent flow of a viscous incompressible liquid streaming around a dimple on a plane. Technical Phys Lett 26:15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mumford JC, Savil AM (1984) Parametric studies of flat plate, turbulence manipulators including direct drag results and laser flow visualisation laminar turbulent boundary layer. ASME FED 11:41–51Google Scholar
  11. Zhdanov VL, Papenfuss HD, Zils M (1999) Reduction of the aerodynamic drag of a model using plate set in the boundary layer. J Eng Phys Thermophys 71:1087–1121Google Scholar
  12. Zhdanov VL (1999) Effect of jet bleed out of the base of a model on the base pressure and frequency characteristics of wake flow. J Eng Phys Thermophys 71:627–632Google Scholar
  13. Zhdanov VL (2000) The turbulent wake transformation under the influence of base bleed. J Eng Phys Thermophys 72:92–99Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.A.V. Luikov Heat and Mass Transfer InstituteMinskBelarus
  2. 2.Institut für Thermo und FluiddynamikRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations