Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Penile low intensity shock wave treatment for PDE5I refractory erectile dysfunction: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Over the last decade, penile low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) has emerged as a promising alternative for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The aim of this trial is to assess the effect of electromagnetic LI-ESWT on the erectile function of vascular phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) refractory ED patients.

Methods

Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. 76 patients with vascular PDE5I-refractory ED completed the study. 40 men were treated with LI-ESWT (1 session/week for 4 weeks, 5000 shocks/session, 0.09 mJ/mm2 energy density) and 36 were treated with a sham probe. Baseline and post-treatment (1, 3 and 6 months) evaluations were performed using validated erectile function questionnaires (IIEF-EF, EHS, SEP2, SEP3 and GAQ1). The groups were compared using Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon and chi-squared tests, with results considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

At the 3-month follow-up, median change in IIEF-EF score for active and sham groups was 3.5 (IQR 0–10) and − 0.5 (IQR − 11 to 1), respectively (p < 0.05). Six months after treatment, 52.5% of patients (21/40) in the active group and 27.8% of patients (10/36) in the sham group presented an EHS > 2 (p < 0.05). At the same evaluation, 40.0% (16/40) and 13.9% (5/36) of patients had positive answers to GAQ-1, in the treated and sham groups, respectively (p < 0.05). No adverse events were observed during the study.

Conclusion

This study showed that penile electromagnetic shockwave therapy may improve erectile function, to a modest extent, on certain patients that do not respond to PDE5I; making it an alternative for vascular ED patients that reject more invasive therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fode M, Hatzichristodoulou G, Serefoglu EC et al (2017) Low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction: Is the evidence strong enough? Nat Rev Urol 14:593–606. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hatzimouratidis K, Amar E, Eardley I et al (2010) Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Eur Urol 57:804–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoofs E, Fode M, Capogrosso P, Albersen M (2019) Current guideline recommendations and analysis of evidence quality on low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 31:209–217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0132-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Besiroglu H, Otunctemur A, Ozbek E (2015) The relationship between metabolic syndrome, its components, and erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Sex Med 12:1309–1318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vardi Y, Appel B, Jacob G et al (2010) Can low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy improve erectile function? A 6-month follow-up pilot study in patients with organic erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol 58:243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruenwald I, Kitrey ND, Appel B, Vardi Y (2013) Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy in vascular disease and erectile dysfunction: theory and outcomes. Sex Med Rev 1:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/smrj.9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruenwald I, Appel B, Vardi Y (2012) Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy-a novel effective treatment for erectile dysfunction in severe ED patients who respond poorly to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. J Sex Med 9:259–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02498.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carson C, Giuliano F, Goldstein I et al (2004) The “effectiveness” scale—Therapeutic outcome of pharmacologic therapies for ED: an international consensus panel report. Int J Impot Res 16:207–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kitrey ND, Gruenwald I, Appel B et al (2016) Penile low intensity shock wave treatment is able to shift PDE5i nonresponders to responders: a double-blind, sham controlled study. J Urol 195:1550–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fojecki GL, Tiessen S, Osther PJS (2018) Effect of linear low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction—12-month follow-up of a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled study. Sex Med 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2017.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Capogrosso P, Frey A, Jensen CFS et al (2019) Low-intensity shock wave therapy in sexual medicine—clinical recommendations from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM). J Sex Med 16:1490–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel P, Huang C, Molina M, Ramasamy R (2019) Clinical trial update on shockwave therapy and future of erectile function restoration. Int J Impot Res 31:206–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0115-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH et al (2018) Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol 200:633–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J CG, Jones TH, Kadioglu A M-SJ, Minhas S, Serefoglu EC (2020) VP EAU guidelines on sexual and reproductive health. Eur Assoc Urol

  15. Qiu X, Lin G, Xin Z et al (2013) Effects of low-energy shockwave therapy on the erectile function and tissue of a diabetic rat model. J Sex Med 10:738–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ciampa AR, De Prati AC, Amelio E et al (2005) Nitric oxide mediates anti-inflammatory action of extracorporeal shock waves. FEBS Lett 579:6839–6845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.11.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hausner T, Pajer K, Halat G et al (2012) Improved rate of peripheral nerve regeneration induced by extracorporeal shock wave treatment in the rat. Exp Neurol 236:363–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.04.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schuh C, Hausner T, Redl H (2016) A therapeutic shock propels Schwann cells to proliferate in peripheral nerve injury. Brain Circ 2:138. https://doi.org/10.4103/2394-8108.192520

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tepeköylü C, Wang FS, Kozaryn R et al (2013) Shock wave treatment induces angiogenesis and mobilizes endogenous CD31/CD34-positive endothelial cells in a hindlimb ischemia model: implications for angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146:971–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lei H, Xin H, Guan R et al (2015) Low-intensity Pulsed ultrasound improves erectile function in streptozotocin-induced type i diabetic rats. Urology 86:1241.e11–1241.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Srini VS, Reddy RK, Shultz T, Denes B (2015) Low intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction: a study in an Indian population. Can J Urol 22:7614–7622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang H, Seftel AD (2019) Controversies in low intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 31:239–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vardi Y, Appel B, Kilchevsky A, Gruenwald I (2012) Does low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy have a physiological effect on erectile function? Short-term results of a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study. J Urol 187:1769–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fojecki GL, Tiessen S, Osther PJS (2017) Effect of Low-energy linear shockwave therapy on erectile dysfunction—a double-blinded, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Sex Med 14:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.11.307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yee CH, Chan ESY, Hou SSM, Ng CF (2014) Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled study. Int J Urol 21:1041–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Olsen AB, Persiani M, Boie S et al (2015) Can low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy improve erectile dysfunction? A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Urol 49:329–333. https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2014.984326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Motil I, Kubis I, Sramkova T (2016) Treatment of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction with piezowave2 device. application of low intensity shockwaves using novel linear shockwave tissue coverage (LSTC-ED&reg;) technique. A prospective, multicentric placebo-controlled study. Adv Sex Med 06:15–18. https://doi.org/10.4236/asm.2016.62002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamaçake KGR, Carneiro F, Cury J et al (2019) Low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. A prospective, randomized, double blinded, sham-controlled study with evaluation by penile Doppler ultrasonography. Int J Impot Res 31:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0062-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kalyvianakis D, Hatzichristou D (2017) Low-intensity shockwave therapy improves hemodynamic parameters in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction: a triplex ultrasonography-based sham-controlled trial. J Sex Med 14:891–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baccaglini W, Pazeto CL, Corrêa Barros EA et al (2020) The role of the low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy on penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Sex Med 17:688–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sramkova T, Motil I, Jarkovsky J, Sramkova K (2019) Erectile dysfunction treatment using focused linear low-intensity extracorporeal shockwaves: single-blind, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Urol Int. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu Z, Lin G, Reed-Maldonado A et al (2017) Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment improves erectile function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 71:223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Man L, Li G (2018) Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology 119:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Clavijo RI, Kohn TP, Kohn JR, Ramasamy R (2017) Effects of Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy on erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med 14:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Angulo JC, Arance I, de Heras MM et al (2017) Efficacy of low-intensity shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Actas Urol Esp 41:479–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2017.07.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zou ZJ, Tang LY, Liu ZH et al (2017) Short-term efficacy and safety of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy in erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 43:805–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Poulakis V, Skriapas K, de Vries R et al (2006) Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for Peyronie’s disease: an alternative treatment? Asian J Androl 8:361–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7262.2006.00138.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JV: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. DM: data collection. OR: project development. ER-C: project development. JS-C: project development, data collection, manuscript writing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose Vinay.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The researchers received materials for the LI-EWST device from the manufacturer (Direx Group, Wiesbaden, Germany) to carry out the clinical trial. No special funding was received.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This study was reviewed and approved by Fundació Puigvert Ethics Review Board: (FP-ANDRO-2016/01).

Informed consent

Participants provided written informed consent before enrolling in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vinay, J., Moreno, D., Rajmil, O. et al. Penile low intensity shock wave treatment for PDE5I refractory erectile dysfunction: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial. World J Urol 39, 2217–2222 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03373-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03373-y

Keywords

Navigation