3D printing technology and its role in urological training
- 31 Downloads
Surgical simulation and 3D printing have both been gaining traction exclusively over the past decade, and now have started to appear simultaneously in current research. The opinion that surgical simulation should be part of surgery curricula is becoming ever more apparent. In this review, we highlight and briefly examine the 3D printing workflow, and each facet of the current body of literature using this technology in the augmentation of surgical training, in addition to the challenges currently faced.
A broad literature search was conducted pertaining to the utilisation of 3D printing in urology, aiming to sample the majority of use-cases of this fairly novel technology. The 3D printing workflow, current use-cases of 3D printing as applied to urological training, and challenges faced have been described.
A respectable number of surgical use-cases utilising 3D printing technology in their development were identified, including but not limited to percutaneous nephrolithotomy, partial nephrectomy, renal transplantation, laparoscopic pyeloplasty, prostate brachytherapy, transurethral resection of bladder tumours, urethrovesical anastomosis simulation devices, in addition to laparoscopic trainers and robotic surgery phantoms.
Over the last decade, urology has taken this cutting-edge technology in its stride; flaunting its efficacy in the augmentation of a number of procedural training applications. The number of use cases for this technology is only expected to rise as its virtues are demonstrated, the ease of use and availability of 3D printing units advances, and costs abated.
KeywordsSimulation 3D printing Innovation Training
BS: manuscript writing. PD: manuscript editing.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals:
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Preece R (2015) The current role of simulation in urological training. Cent Eur J Urol 68(2). https://ceju.online/journal/2015/educational-models-simulation-training-urology-522.php
- 9.Bruyère F, Leroux C, Brunereau L, Lermusiaux P (2008) Rapid prototyping model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy training. J Endourol 2(1):91–96Google Scholar
- 10.Stone J, Bonamico R, Erturk E, Ghazi A (2017) PD41-01 improved surgical outcomes after preoperative rehearsal using 3D printed patient specific simulation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). J Urol 197(4):e807Google Scholar
- 14.Okada A, Tozawa K, Kobayashi D, Mizuno K, Umemoto Y, Kawai N et al (2016) MP34-02 printed three-dimensional elastic organ model to increase robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performance. J Urol 195(4):e471Google Scholar
- 15.Ng TL, Li CF, Kan WM, Ng CM, Kan CF, Ngai HY et al (2017) 3D printing of kidney models for urological surgeries: our initial experience. Int J Urol 24(Suppl 1):45Google Scholar
- 16.von Rundstedt F-C, Scovell JM, Agrawal S, Zaneveld J, Link RE (2017) Utility of patient-specific silicone renal models for planning and rehearsal of complex tumour resections prior to robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 119(4):598–604Google Scholar
- 17.Golab A, Smektala T, Kaczmarek K, Stamirowski R, Hrab M, Slojewski M (2017) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy supported by training involving personalized silicone replica poured in three-dimensional printed casting mold. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 27(4):420–422Google Scholar
- 18.Stone J, Melnyk R, Wu G, Rashid H, Joseph J, Ghazi A (2017) V4–01 patient specific rehearsal using 3D printing for complex partial nephrectomy cases. J Urol 197(4):e375Google Scholar
- 20.Shiga Y, Sugimoto M, Iwabuchi T, Kawano Y, Oiwa Y, Watanabe H et al (2014) 1124 Benefit of three-dimensional printing in robotic laparoscopic renal surgery: tangible surgical navigation using a patient-based three-dimensional printed kidney. Eur Urol Suppl 13(1):e1124Google Scholar
- 22.Uwechue R, Gogalniceanu P, Kessaris N, Byrne N, Chandak P, Olsburgh J, et al (2018) A novel 3D-printed hybrid simulation model for robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT). J Robot Surg. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11701-018-0780-y. Accessed 27 Jan 2018
- 25.Horn M, Reh B, Wenz F, Stallkamp J, Mombaur K (2016) Patient specific corotated FEM simulation and gelatin phantom for prostate brachytherapy. In: 2016 6th IEEE international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob). IEEE, pp 341–346. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7523649/
- 26.Ghazi A, Stone J, Park J, Candela B, Kukreja J, Rashid H et al (2016) V8–01 full procedural simulation for transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) using 3D printing technology. J Urol 195(4):e771Google Scholar
- 27.Wong NC, Hoogenes J, Guo Y, Quantz MA, Matsumoto ED (2017) Techniques: utility of a 3D printed bladder model for teaching minimally invasive urethrovesical anastomosis. Can Urol Assoc J 11(7):321Google Scholar
- 29.Yoon R, Okhunov Z, Dolan B, Schwartz MJ, Shah PH, Bierwiler H et al (2017) PD41-10 evaluation of the feasibility of remotely manufactured low-cost three-dimensionally printed laparoscopic trainers and comparison to standard laparoscopic trainers. J Urol 197(4):e810–e811Google Scholar
- 30.Opik R, Hunt A, Ristolainen A, Aubin PM, Kruusmaa M (2012) Development of high fidelity liver and kidney phantom organs for use with robotic surgical systems. In: 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob). IEEE, pp 425–430. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6290831/
- 32.Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Checcucci E, Artibani W, Dasgupta P et al (2018) Augmented reality during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: expert robotic surgeons’ on-the-spot insights after live surgery. Minerva Urol e Nefrol 70(2):226–229Google Scholar