World Journal of Urology

, Volume 37, Issue 12, pp 2671–2675 | Cite as

Green-laser assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy for selective muscle-invasive bladder cancer: technique and initial outcome

  • Jinhai Fan
  • Kaijie Wu
  • Pu Zhang
  • Dalin HeEmail author
Original Article



To describe a green-laser marking technique to assist partial cystectomy, which allows accurate identification of tumour margins, and provide our initial experience with ten patients.


Between January 2014 and February 2018, ten patients suspected with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and request of bladder-preserving treatment were selected. In each case, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed before green-laser assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy. Under the direct view of cystoscope, the front-firing green-laser incision was performed 0.5–1 cm away from the exterior margin of lesion with adequate depth into the fat tissue. Tumours were then en bloc removed via laparoscope under the tracing of laser beam.


The location of 12 tumours in 10 patients was superior wall in 7 cases, lateral wall in 3 cases, anterior wall in 1 case, and posterior wall in 1 case. All procedures were completed without serious complications. The median operating time was 270 (210–360) min with a median haemoglobin decrease of 11 (3–38) g/L. Nine patients were high-grade transitional cell carcinoma and one patient was urachal carcinoma, and the clinical stage was pT1 in 1 case, pT2 in 4 cases, and pT3 in 5 cases. The pathological evaluation of tumour margins was negative in 10 patients. During the follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis were detected in 8 patients, but 2 patients presented regional recurrence.


The use of green-laser marking technique during laparoscopic partial cystectomy is a feasible manoeuvre in assisting the accurate incision and minimizing injury to the remaining bladder.


Muscle-invasive bladder cancer Partial cystectomy Green-laser New technique 



This study was supported by the Clinical Research Award of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, China (No. XJTU1AF-CRF-2015–002 to DH).

Author contributions

Fan: project development and manuscript writing. Wu: data analysis and manuscript writing. PZ: data collection and manuscript writing. DH: project development.


The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

345_2019_2712_MOESM1_ESM.mp4 (56.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 58174 KB)


  1. 1.
    Merseburger AS, Matuschek I, Kuczyk MA (2008) Bladder preserving strategies for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 18:513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yamanaka K, Miyake H, Hara I et al (2007) Significance of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients over 80 years old. Int Urol Nephrol 39:209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elting LS, Pettaway C, Bekele BN (2005) Correlation between annual volume of cystectomy, professional staffing, and outcomes: a statewide, population-based study. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc 104:975Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schover LR, Evans R, von Eschenbach AC (1986) Sexual rehabilitation and male radical cystectomy. J Urol 136:1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sweeney P, Kursh ED, Resnick MI (1992) Partial cystectomy. Urol Clin North Am 19:701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology 55:630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seracchioli R, Mannini D, Colombo FM et al (2002) Cystoscopy-assisted laparoscopic resection of extramucosal bladder endometriosis. J Endourol 16:663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Katz R et al (2014) Cystoscopic-assisted partial cystectomy: description of technique and results. Res Rep Urol 6:139PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim BK, Song MH, Yang HJ et al (2012) Use of cystoscopic tattooing in laparoscopic partial cystectomy. Korean J Urol 53:401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kassouf W, Swanson D, Kamat AM et al (2006) Partial cystectomy for muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary review of the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Urol 175: 2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holzbeierlein JM, Lopez-Corona E, Bochner BH et al (2004) Partial cystectomy: a contemporary review of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience and recommendations for patient selection. J Urol 172:878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Razmaria AA (2015) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in nncology: bladder cancer (Version 5.2017) 314: 1886Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN, Nagele U et al (2012) EAU guidelines on laser technologies. Eur Urol 61:783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kramer MW, Bach T, Wolters M et al (2011) Current evidence for transurethral laser therapy of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 29:433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations