Comparison of < 100 cc prostates and > 100 cc prostates undergoing aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia
Surgical options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) become limited when treating large prostates due to steep learning curves and less effective treatment. Aquablation (AquaBeam System, PROCEPT BioRobotics, Inc., USA) could remedy this. We compare the effectiveness of Aquablation in large prostates between 80 cc and 100 cc and very large prostates > 100 cc.
WATER II (NCT03123250) is a prospective, multicenter, international clinical trial of Aquablation for the surgical treatment of LUTS/BPH in men of age 45–80 years with prostates between 80 cc and 150 cc. Aquablation was performed using the AquaBeam System. The reported analysis compares the subgroup of patients with a baseline prostate size of < 100 cc versus those with a prostate size of > 100 cc. Students’ t test was used for continuous variables and Fisher’s test for ordinal/binary variables.
Of 114 screened patients, 101 meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled at 13 US and 3 Canadian sites between September and December 2017. Mean operative time was 31.2 ± 8 min in the < 100 cc subgroup and 41.7 ± 14.9 min in the > 100 cc subgroup. The average length of stay following the procedure for the < 100 cc subgroup was 1.5 ± 0.7 days versus 1.7 ± 1.1 days for the > 100 cc subgroup. Mean changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life, and IPSS voiding and storage subscores were substantial, occurring soon after treatment and averaging (at 3 months) 16.5, 2.8, 10.6, and 5.8 points, respectively (all p < 0.0001).
Aquablation clinically normalizes outcomes between patients of the < 100 cc and > 100 cc prostate cohorts. It is safe and effective in patients with large prostate glands (> 100 cc) with a smoother learning curve.
KeywordsAquablation Benign prostatic hyperplasia Large prostate
NB: Protocol/project development, data interpretation, manuscript writing/editing. DDN: data interpretation, manuscript writing/editing. kaufman: review. DE: protocol/project development, review. KCZ: protocol/project development, review.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Study data were entered into an electronic data capture system by site coordinators, were monitored, and source-verified by monitors hired by the study sponsor (PROCEPT BioRobotics).
Human or animal studies
This research involves humans.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
- 1.McAninch JW, Lue TF (eds) (2013) Smith & Tanagho's general urology. McGraw-Hill Medical, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 3.McVary KT (2006) BPH: epidemiology and comorbidities. Am J Manag Care 2(5 suppl):122–128. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16613526. Accessed 6 Jul 2018
- 4.Foster HE, Barry MJ, Dahm P et al (2018) Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline. J Urol. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534718432016?via%3Dihub. Accessed 6 Jul 2018
- 12.Valdivieso R, Hueber P-A, Bruyere F et al (2018) Multicenter international experience of 180 W LBO laser photo-vaporization in men with extremely large prostates (prostate volume > 200cc): is there a size limit? Eur Urol Suppl. 17(2):e191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-9056(18)30978-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lin Y, Wu X, Xu A et al (2016) Transurethral enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Urol 34(9):1207–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1735-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Desai M, Bidair M, Bhojani N, et al (2018) WATER II (80–150 mL) procedural outcomes. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14360
- 25.Sorokin I, Sundaram V, Singla N et al (2017) Robot-assisted versus open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands: a propensity score-matched comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes. J Endourol 31(11):1164–1169. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0489 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Saluja M, Masters J, Van Rij S (2018) Open simple prostatectomy. In: The Big Prostate. Springer, Cham, pp 143–152Google Scholar
- 29.Marra G, Sturch P, Oderda M, Tabatabaei S, Muir G, Gontero P (2016) Systematic review of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatments on men’s ejaculatory function: time for a bespoke approach? Int J Urol 23(1):22–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12866 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar