Papillary puncture: still a good practice
All authors have made a significant contribution to the work and approved the final version of the manuscript. DC: manuscript writing; SF: manuscript editing; AF: manuscript editing.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the contributing authors have any conflict of interest, including specific financial interests or relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.
- 1.Kyriazis I, Kallidonis P, Vasilas M, Panagopoulos V, Kamal W, Liatsikos E (2017) Challenging the wisdom of puncture at the calyceal fornix in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: feasibility and safety study with 137 patients operated via a non-calyceal percutaneous track. World J Urol 35(5):795–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar