World Journal of Urology

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 589–594 | Cite as

Management of post TURP strictures

  • Sanjay B. Kulkarni
  • Omkar Joglekar
  • Mohammad Alkandari
  • Pankaj M. JoshiEmail author
Topic Paper



Urethral stricture is a well-known complication after transurethral surgeries. The incidence of urethral stricture after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) varies between 2.2 and 9.8%. Most of the cases present within 6 months of transurethral surgery. Presentation is likely with poor flow, urinary tract infection or acute retention.

Materials and methods

A prospective study was undertaken from January 2010–June 2017 for the management of post TURP stricture. A total of 170 patients with stricture urethra due to TURP were studied.


The age of patients was 54–87 years (mean age 67.34). The mean preop Qmax was 6.1 ml (range 0–15). The length of stricture varied from very short in the proximal bulbar to pan urethral stricture. Out of 170, 94 were treated with dorsal approach, 71 with ventral approach and 5 with simultaneous distal dorsal, proximal ventral approach. Five patients underwent endoscopic procedure. Mean BMG length was 6.25 cm (4–8) and width was 1.5 cm (1.3–1.8). Overall success rate was 82.43%.


Urethral stricture is a well-known complication after transurethral surgeries. Post TURP can cause stricture at any part urethra. BMG mucosa Urethroplasty is the safe, feasible and offer long-term success in these patient and should be strongly considered over CIC and VIU. Ventral approach is best suited for proximal bulbar strictures close to membranous urethra. This is a continence preserving surgery.


Urethral stricture TURP Proximal bulbar stricture 


  1. 1.
    Nielsen KK, Norgling J (1990) Urethral stricture following transurethral prostatectomy. Urology 35:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chung JH, Kang DH, Moon HS, Jeong TY, US Ha, JH Han et al (2013) Effects of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose on urethral stricture after transurethral resections of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicenter, single blinded, randomized controlled study. J Endourol 27(4):463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bissada NK (1977) Transurethral resection of prostate via perineal urethrostomy: follow up and report. Urology 10:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emmett JL et al (1963) Preliminary internal urethrotomy in 1036 cases to prevent urethral stricture following transurethral resection; calibre of normal adult male urethra. J Urol 89:829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kulkarni S (2012) Post TURP complications and mangement. In: Ramalingam M, Albala DM (eds) Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Macmillan, New York, pp 254–262Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M (2002) Dorsal onlay techniques for urethroplasty. Urol Clin North Am 29(2):389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kulkarni S, Barbagli G, Sansalone S, Lazzeri M (2009) One-sided anterior urethroplasty: a new dorsal onlay graft technique. BJUI 104(8):1150–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morey A, Mc Aninch JW (1996) When and how to use buccal mucosa grafts in urethroplasty. Urology 48(2):194–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Turner-Warwick R (1986) The principles of urethral reconstruction. In: Williams DI (ed) Operative surgery: urology. Butterworth, London, pp 480–520 (Rob and Smith’s Operative Suregry, 4th edn) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjay B. Kulkarni
    • 1
  • Omkar Joglekar
    • 1
  • Mohammad Alkandari
    • 1
  • Pankaj M. Joshi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology CenterPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations