Analysis of a practical surgical skills laboratory for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy
With the rapidly expanding anatomical and technical knowledge surrounding nervesparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP), anatomical and operative textbooks have failed to keep pace with the literature. A surgical skill laboratory (SSL) was designed to educate urology trainees on surgical anatomy and techniques for NSRP. The objective was to assess the validity of a SSL program.
A low-fidelity, anatomically accurate prostate model with its appropriate fascial coverings and location of the neurovascular bundle was created. Participants were surveyed prior to a SSL workshop for their knowledge of NSRP focusing on clinical and anatomical considerations. An interactive 2-h tutorial and workshop was then undertaken outlining the clinical and anatomical nuances for NSRP, with participants then practising an intra and inter-fascial NSRP on the model. Participants were resurveyed immediately after the workshop and at 6 months.
Thirty participants completed the NSRP workshop. Significant differences (p < 0.0001) in anatomical and clinical knowledge were noted after the workshop with improvements for both junior and senior trainees. The knowledge was retained at 6 months following the workshop.
A low-fidelity bench-top model is a feasible and reproducible technique for improving the understanding of periprostatic anatomy and the different surgical approaches for NSRP. The SSL is useful and knowledge gained appears to be retained by workshop participants. SSL workshops are a valid hands-on approach to teaching surgical skills and should remain an integral part of urology training.
KeywordsProstate cancer Neurovascular bundle Anatomical models Surgical skills laboratory Nerve-sparing prostatectomy
EC: Manuscript writing/editing. DC: Manuscript writing/editing. UL: Project/protocol development, Data collection/management. KF: Data analysis, Data collection/management. EJ: Data collection/management. AF: Data collection/management. NF: Project/protocol development, Data collection/management. NL: Project/protocol development, Manuscript writing/editing
No funding was received for this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
- 2.Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M, Sarle R, Vallancien G, Delmas V, Hassan M, Bansal A, Hemal AK, Guillonneau B, Menon M (2003) An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 43(5):444–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00093-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Clarebrough EE, Challacombe BJ, Briggs C, Namdarian B, Weston R, Murphy DG, Costello AJ (2011) Cadaveric analysis of periprostatic nerve distribution: an anatomical basis for high anterior release during radical prostatectomy? J Urol 185(4):1519–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Takenaka A, Kawada M, Murakami G, Hisasue S, Tsukamoto T, Fujisawa M (2005) Interindividual variation in distribution of extramural ganglion cells in the male pelvis: a semi-quantitative and immunohistochemical study concerning nerve-sparing pelvic surgery. Eur Urol 48(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.010 (discussion 52) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E, Horninger W, Peschel R, Bartsch G, Vaughan ED (2006) The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 98(2):314–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06266.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Kaul S, Savera A, Badani K, Fumo M, Bhandari A, Menon M (2006) Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int 97(3):467–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.05990.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM (2010) A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 58(3):457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Montorsi F, Brock G, Lee J, Shapiro J, Van Poppel H, Graefen M, Stief C (2008) Effect of nightly versus on-demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 54(4):924–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.083 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Rassweiler J, Wagner AA, Moazin M, Gozen AS, Teber D, Frede T, Su LM (2006) Anatomic nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparison of retrograde and antegrade techniques. Urology 68(3):587–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.082 (discussion 591–582) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Cheung CL, Looi T, Lendvay TS, Drake JM, Farhat WA (2014) Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Surg Educ 71(5):762–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.03.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar